by FranksHobbies » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:26 am
I contacted Joel Hartman and with his kind permission I am posting his explanantion:
<<Hi Bill,
Thanks for your interest in the animation. The anomoly that you refer to is in fact an image artifact. It's caused by the way the images are matched before combining them into an animation. Because the images were taken at different times, through different sky conditions, and are also composited from multiple filters, you have to first match the seeing (how much the stars are blurred by the atmosphere) between the images and the light levels. When you match the seeing, stars that are saturated (they're so bright that their light fills the pixel wells on the camera) get little black rings around them and little black spots inside. These rings will change from image to image, but since it's not a physical variation, I tried to mask them out - otherwise they're quite distracting and take away from the real variations in the non-saturated stars that are interesting. Unfortunately, I missed a few of them - and so you see the little spots show up. I suppose that should probably be removed with photoshop or something.>>
I contacted Joel Hartman and with his kind permission I am posting his explanantion:
<<Hi Bill,
Thanks for your interest in the animation. The anomoly that you refer to is in fact an image artifact. It's caused by the way the images are matched before combining them into an animation. Because the images were taken at different times, through different sky conditions, and are also composited from multiple filters, you have to first match the seeing (how much the stars are blurred by the atmosphere) between the images and the light levels. When you match the seeing, stars that are saturated (they're so bright that their light fills the pixel wells on the camera) get little black rings around them and little black spots inside. These rings will change from image to image, but since it's not a physical variation, I tried to mask them out - otherwise they're quite distracting and take away from the real variations in the non-saturated stars that are interesting. Unfortunately, I missed a few of them - and so you see the little spots show up. I suppose that should probably be removed with photoshop or something.>>