by iamlucky13 » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:54 pm
I couldn't find the altitude. The rocket was initially in a 108 mile parking orbit. At some point after that, there was to be a series of three burns to raise the satellite to geosynchronous orbit. Somewhere in there the rocket failed to fire, still partially full of fuel, and the satellite was released from the booster (3rd stage, I believe). It was low enough that the satellite eventually re-entered.
The satellite operators would've tracked the satellite position, but presumably the booster just became another object in the orbital catalogue. The explosion was most likely caused by gradually solar heating increasing the pressure of the fuel remaining in the tanks until they ruptured. I doubt the density of the debris field is detrimental to astronomy for more than a couple days. It's probably just hydrazine. The space shuttle dumps spare hydrazine before re-entry for safety (it's toxic and very reactive), and no one seems concerned about that.
The links at the end of the APOD are rather pessimistic. There's no where near enough stuff up there at the moment for a "Kessler cascade" to be likely. I can't think of a single instance of significant damage occuring to a satellite attributed to orbital debris...just minor things like nicks on the space shuttle or solar panel degradation.
I couldn't find the altitude. The rocket was initially in a 108 mile parking orbit. At some point after that, there was to be a series of three burns to raise the satellite to geosynchronous orbit. Somewhere in there the rocket failed to fire, still partially full of fuel, and the satellite was released from the booster (3rd stage, I believe). It was low enough that the satellite eventually re-entered.
The satellite operators would've tracked the satellite position, but presumably the booster just became another object in the orbital catalogue. The explosion was most likely caused by gradually solar heating increasing the pressure of the fuel remaining in the tanks until they ruptured. I doubt the density of the debris field is detrimental to astronomy for more than a couple days. It's probably just hydrazine. The space shuttle dumps spare hydrazine before re-entry for safety (it's toxic and very reactive), and no one seems concerned about that.
The links at the end of the APOD are rather pessimistic. There's no where near enough stuff up there at the moment for a "Kessler cascade" to be likely. I can't think of a single instance of significant damage occuring to a satellite attributed to orbital debris...just minor things like nicks on the space shuttle or solar panel degradation.