by Chris Peterson » Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:51 pm
zbvhs wrote:So, let's understand this: The view is to the east and the Sun is setting in the west behind the observer. Parallel light rays from the Sun were refracted by Earth's atmosphere so that they appear to converge at infinity in the east. Correct?
Not exactly. First, you're not seeing light rays, you're seeing the shadows of clouds. And there is no refraction involved. The shadows are actually pretty much parallel to each other; they appear to converge because that's what parallel lines do as they get more distant (think railroad tracks).
It isn't uncommon when you see anticrepuscular rays like this to see crepuscular rays in the west as well. That is, you can follow the shadows from where they converge in the east (the antisolar point), up and overhead, where they are spread out, and back down to the west where they converge again, on the Sun (which is likely to be behind the clouds, but isn't always).
[quote="zbvhs"]So, let's understand this: The view is to the east and the Sun is setting in the west behind the observer. Parallel light rays from the Sun were refracted by Earth's atmosphere so that they appear to converge at infinity in the east. Correct?[/quote]
Not exactly. First, you're not seeing light rays, you're seeing the shadows of clouds. And there is no refraction involved. The shadows are actually pretty much parallel to each other; they appear to converge because that's what parallel lines do as they get more distant (think railroad tracks).
It isn't uncommon when you see anticrepuscular rays like this to see crepuscular rays in the west as well. That is, you can follow the shadows from where they converge in the east (the antisolar point), up and overhead, where they are spread out, and back down to the west where they converge again, on the Sun (which is likely to be behind the clouds, but isn't always).