by Indigo_Sunrise » Mon May 12, 2008 2:42 pm
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:
Confused - Case most likely went to the link that is positioned beneath the image - if it had been there..?
Case indicated that the page was working for Case. Are you agreeing with Case that the page is working for you? If so, then that contradicts your other comment(s). If the page is not working for you, but you are explaining why it is working for Case, then I don't understand what you mean by "Case most likely went to the link that ...".
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:
(Case, care to share how you found the image link?)
Look closer at this discussion. I think you are missing a couple of things.
Note that in the HTML code I posted are the addresses of the images for May 11. The addresses of the images for May 12 are also in the HTML for the May 12 (today's) page. I don't know how Case got the addresses, but that is one easy and reliable way to do it.
Confused - I think you're *ahem*
confused by what I meant. I've never been known for my clarity, but I did not mean that I could see the image. Hence, why I wrote
'glad I'm not the only one with this problem' . So, no I did not contradict myself. And I don't think I've missed anything. According to other posters, it seems to have been a browser issue, which has since been resolved.
But thanks for your concerns......
[quote]Indigo_Sunrise wrote:
Confused - Case most likely went to the link that is positioned beneath the image - if it had been there..?
Case indicated that the page was working for Case. Are you agreeing with Case that the page is working for you? If so, then that contradicts your other comment(s). If the page is not working for you, but you are explaining why it is working for Case, then I don't understand what you mean by "Case most likely went to the link that ...".
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:
(Case, care to share how you found the image link?)
Look closer at this discussion. I think you are missing a couple of things.
Note that in the HTML code I posted are the addresses of the images for May 11. The addresses of the images for May 12 are also in the HTML for the May 12 (today's) page. I don't know how Case got the addresses, but that is one easy and reliable way to do it.[/quote]
Confused - I think you're *ahem* [i]confused[/i] by what I meant. I've never been known for my clarity, but I did not mean that I could see the image. Hence, why I wrote [i]'glad I'm not the only one with this problem' [/i]. So, no I did not contradict myself. And I don't think I've missed anything. According to other posters, it seems to have been a browser issue, which has since been resolved.
But thanks for your concerns......