That iceberg depicted is not part of an Antarctic ice sheet.

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: That iceberg depicted is not part of an Antarctic ice sheet.

by BMAONE23 » Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:35 pm

On an annualized basis, does the distance between the edge of the continental sheet ice and the edge of the solid ocean pack ice (the point where calving begins) increase, decrease, or remain the same every winter?

If the miles between the continental ice sheet and the point of calving is decreasing then the ice sheet itself must be shrinking as must be the total volume of ice contained at the south pole. (Unless continental drift has relocated the pole itself. If that happened then the total overall ice sheet could shift position without diminishing the total overall ice contained within.)

by fastartceetoo » Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:18 pm

sklipper, would the calving of ice masses this large be the result of a normal, ongoing process? Or might the ice stream involved be accelerating? Just wondering...

That iceberg depicted is not part of an Antarctic ice sheet.

by sklipper » Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:21 am

That iceberg depicted is not part of an Antarctic ice sheet. It is a free floating mass of ice -- in this case temporarily attached to a field of sea ice -- that once calved off of the tongue of a coastal glacier which in turn, most likely, flowed down an ice stream coming off of a continental ice sheet

Top