by craterchains » Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:53 am
BMAONE23
According to the scientists that research these things crater chains can have quite a variable. My personal requirements are a bit different, a bit more exacting that eliminate many of their "accepted crater chains".
Well, JohnD, Jim Bignell can see the "lines", the JPL site speaks of them, I see them, others have seen them, and you see one broken one. And by the way, the image on APOD is only 60kb. The .jpg file at JPL is as big as you say, and the .tif is 1 + meg. file.
But all that aside. Show "us"? Who else wants to know?
I may have a personal opinion, or two, about these types of crater chains, but it isn't "politically correct". My crater chain research ended over a year ago, other than collecting any new images that come in and show CS types of crater chains. You may have to ask someone over at BA to "show" them to you. Or, they may have another opinion as to what all those parallel lines are?
Norval
BMAONE23
According to the scientists that research these things crater chains can have quite a variable. My personal requirements are a bit different, a bit more exacting that eliminate many of their "accepted crater chains".
Well, JohnD, Jim Bignell can see the "lines", the JPL site speaks of them, I see them, others have seen them, and you see one broken one. And by the way, the image on APOD is only 60kb. The .jpg file at JPL is as big as you say, and the .tif is 1 + meg. file.
But all that aside. Show "us"? Who else wants to know? :?
I may have a personal opinion, or two, about these types of crater chains, but it isn't "politically correct". My crater chain research ended over a year ago, other than collecting any new images that come in and show CS types of crater chains. You may have to ask someone over at BA to "show" them to you. Or, they may have another opinion as to what all those parallel lines are? :D
Norval