by Ann » Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:33 am
The Tarantula Nebula from SuperBIT
Image Credit: SuperBIT, NASA
When I first saw this image, I was unimpressed. I was, like, come on, haven't we seen hundreds of pictures of the Tarantula Nebula? What's so special about this one?
But when I started searching for pictures that would do a better job of showing the Tarantula Nebula than the SuperBIT one, I was humbled.
What I found was closeups of the R136 region:
Then there were "full" images of the Tarantula that nevertheless left something to be desired (to me at least):
I really do recommend the sequence of images below, but of course it is always much easier to show things with several images rather than one:
So, okay! Today's APOD does a more than acceptable job of bringing out both the R136a star cluster, the bright pink nebulosity surrounding the great cluster and the outer faint tarantula-shaped nebula surrounding the bright central parts. On top of that, the colors are okay, although the green stars are not my favorites.
You did an okay job then, SuperBIT! Because photographing the Tarantula, even for professional telescopes, is harder than I had realized.
Ann
[float=left][attachment=0]SuperBIT_tarantula_1024[1].png[/attachment][c][size=85][color=#0040FF]The Tarantula Nebula from SuperBIT
Image Credit: SuperBIT, NASA[/color][/size][/c][/float]
[clear][/clear]
When I first saw this image, I was unimpressed. I was, like, come on, haven't we seen hundreds of pictures of the Tarantula Nebula? What's so special about this one?
But when I started searching for pictures that would do a better job of showing the Tarantula Nebula than the SuperBIT one, I was humbled.
What I found was closeups of the R136 region:
[float=left][img3="Closeup of the R 136a star cluster. Image credit: NASA/ESA/P. Crowther"]https://images.csmonitor.com/csm/2016/03/970946_1_0317-tarantula-nebula-stars_standard.jpg?alias=standard_900x600nc[/img3][/float][float=right][img3="'Medium closeup' of the R136 region by James Webb. Wait, is that bright nebula outline tarantula-shaped?"]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Tarantula_Nebula_by_JWST.jpg/1200px-Tarantula_Nebula_by_JWST.jpg?20220906151442[/img3][/float]
[clear][/clear]
Then there were "full" images of the Tarantula that nevertheless left something to be desired (to me at least):
[float=left][img3="The Tarantula Nebula. The overall 'Tarantula shape' is not obvious to me. Credit: ESO/IDA/Danish 1.5 m/R. Gendler, C. C. Thöne, C. Féron, and J.-E. Ovaldsen"]https://cdn.eso.org/images/screen/tarantula.jpg[/img3][/float][float=right][img3="The Tarantula Nebula. The 'Tarantula shape' is beautifully obvious, but the inner parts of the nebula are overexposed. Credit: D.R."]https://img.pixers.pics/pho_wat(s3:700/FO/59/33/75/23/700_FO59337523_44e6378f2ab94c3993f3119fcf46921d.jpg,700,700,cms:2018/10/5bd1b6b8d04b8_220x50-watermark.png,over,480,650,jpg)/posters-tarantula-nebula.jpg.jpg[/img3][/float]
[clear][/clear]
I really do recommend the sequence of images below, but of course it is always much easier to show things with several images rather than one:
[img3="Overview of the Tarantula Nebula and zooming in on R 136a. Credit: ESO/P. Crowther/C.J. Evans"]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/ESO_-_Eso1030a_%28by%29.jpg/1920px-ESO_-_Eso1030a_%28by%29.jpg[/img3]
So, okay! Today's APOD does a more than acceptable job of bringing out both the R136a star cluster, the bright pink nebulosity surrounding the great cluster and the outer faint tarantula-shaped nebula surrounding the bright central parts. On top of that, the colors are okay, although the green stars are not my favorites.
You did an okay job then, SuperBIT! Because photographing the Tarantula, even for professional telescopes, is harder than I had realized.
Ann