APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by starsurfer » Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:12 pm

A new publication has been published! IMO it is a remnant of an active phase of M31 in the past.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward M31 (23-Jan-17)

by VictorBorun » Thu May 04, 2023 9:37 pm

Above+Beyond wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 8:38 pm Crazy as it sounds, someone is taking the null H-alpha observation as an indication that the oxygen must be pure, meaning it has an artificial origin -- namely it's all the oxygen lost by Apollo 13 some 50+ years ago.

This puts the cloud quite close, so there are at least two kinds of parallax measurements suggested which would at least rule out this possibility; they might already be present in the data but were not noticed because of smearing due to all the stacking.

See: VISNS.NeoCities.org/O-III_cloud_M31.html for more details.
to what extent that oxygen would dilute if let out of a container in the outer space?
Can it be contained by interplanetary space hydrogen?
I believe that the oxygen would quickly dissipate and mix with that hydrogen

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward M31 (23-Jan-17)

by Above+Beyond » Thu May 04, 2023 8:38 pm

Crazy as it sounds, someone is taking the null H-alpha observation as an indication that the oxygen must be pure, meaning it has an artificial origin -- namely it's all the oxygen lost by Apollo 13 some 50+ years ago.

This puts the cloud quite close, so there are at least two kinds of parallax measurements suggested which would at least rule out this possibility; they might already be present in the data but were not noticed because of smearing due to all the stacking.

See: VISNS.NeoCities.org/O-III_cloud_M31.html for more details.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by VictorBorun » Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:17 pm

OgetayK wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:48 pm
VictorBorun wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 3:21 am
OgetayK wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:36 pm I'm curious about this red Hα halo around Andromeda. Not to mention previous works, the following comparison has a significant part missing. Maybe the photographers can explain if this is caused by postprocessing (maybe DBE?).
Image 1: https://ibb.co/cX6Lqnz
Image 2: https://ibb.co/6N1c1Ny
Sorry, what is DBE?
Does it imitate changing clouds in 2022 to 2023 APOD like this?
Click to view full size image 1 or image 2
Unexpected Clouds 2023.pngUnexpected Clouds 2022.png
...
DBE is Dynamic Background Extraction tool in PixInsight. Which is normally used for galaxy/nebulae surrounded by dark background. You manually define the "background" --which is supposed to be just dark sky-- so that any uniformity issues on the image are eliminated (say that left side of the image is brighter due to the light rises from the ground, it removes that). But if you mistakenly select the area where actually there is a cloud data, you remove that too. It's hard to predict because it smooths out to surrounding spots a lot. From your images, you can see most of the structures overlap and there is actually no structural change but some of the bright backgrounds like Ha areas are gone. However, I'm not sure. I'm just hypothesizing. This needs to be answered by the person who processed the image. I believe especially the halo around Andromeda is gone because of processing to reveal the Ha structures within Andromeda.
to not add confusion, would it be better to present a difficult scene (with some pale things hard to see through the noisy foreground) as a pair of images hanging one over the other so you place your mouse on the picture and make pale things brighter, but along with the noisy foreground, or you place your mouse elsewhere and see a clearer picture but no pale things?

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by OgetayK » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:48 pm

VictorBorun wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 3:21 am
OgetayK wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:36 pm I'm curious about this red Hα halo around Andromeda. Not to mention previous works, the following comparison has a significant part missing. Maybe the photographers can explain if this is caused by postprocessing (maybe DBE?).
Image 1: https://ibb.co/cX6Lqnz
Image 2: https://ibb.co/6N1c1Ny
Sorry, what is DBE?
Does it imitate changing clouds in 2022 to 2023 APOD like this?
Click to view full size image 1 or image 2
Unexpected Clouds 2023.pngUnexpected Clouds 2022.png
...
DBE is Dynamic Background Extraction tool in PixInsight. Which is normally used for galaxy/nebulae surrounded by dark background. You manually define the "background" --which is supposed to be just dark sky-- so that any uniformity issues on the image are eliminated (say that left side of the image is brighter due to the light rises from the ground, it removes that). But if you mistakenly select the area where actually there is a cloud data, you remove that too. It's hard to predict because it smooths out to surrounding spots a lot. From your images, you can see most of the structures overlap and there is actually no structural change but some of the bright backgrounds like Ha areas are gone. However, I'm not sure. I'm just hypothesizing. This needs to be answered by the person who processed the image. I believe especially the halo around Andromeda is gone because of processing to reveal the Ha structures within Andromeda.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by VictorBorun » Sat Jan 21, 2023 3:21 am

OgetayK wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:36 pm I'm curious about this red Hα halo around Andromeda. Not to mention previous works, the following comparison has a significant part missing. Maybe the photographers can explain if this is caused by postprocessing (maybe DBE?).
Image 1: https://ibb.co/cX6Lqnz
Image 2: https://ibb.co/6N1c1Ny
Sorry, what is DBE?
Does it imitate changing clouds in 2022 to 2023 APOD like this?
Click to view full size image 1 or image 2
Unexpected Clouds 2023.png
Unexpected Clouds 2022.png
...

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by OgetayK » Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:36 pm

AVAO wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:16 pm
Ann wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 6:50 pm
AVAO wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:56 pm
I see more similarities with NGC 4651 than with IC 2497.

Image

"...The jet-like feature is strikingly coherent and narrow. This feature was previously reported by Vorontsov-Velyaminov (1959) but never interpreted as a stellar tidal stream. Moreover, our deep image shows an additional spectacular crescent shaped shell surrounding the east side of the galaxy that corresponds to the apocenter of the dwarf galaxy. Interestingly, a possible second arc on the western side of the galaxy can also be seen in this image. This structure is less obvious because it is partially hidden by the galaxy's disk. This suggests we are observing a moderately inclined structure projected into the halo of NGC 4651..." https://www.cosmotography.com/images/st ... ights.html
Very good comparison, AVAO!

I found a link to that picture of NGC 4651, and I'm wondering about the insert and the small blue star in brackets. Could that possibly be the core of the small galaxy that was broken up to create that umbrella-like structure of NGC 4651? Although I really wouldn't expect a galactic core to be blue.

And if we are seeing anything even remotely similar in Andromeda, what could the intruding galaxy be? Not, say, M32?

Ann
If I compare the red Hα structures of today's APOD with those of https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap221024.html, the red hallo around M31 is completely missing on today's APOD. the red Hα structure of today's APOD therefore seems to be rather detached from M31 in our galaxy. the OIII shell structure, in turn, does not show any interaction with the red Hα structure. For me, M31, the OIII shell structure and the Hα structure are rather far apart. the fine stripe structure of the OIII shell structure indicates that it could also be very close to us. Research will show in the future.
I'm curious about this red Hα halo around Andromeda. Not to mention previous works, the following comparison has a significant part missing. Maybe the photographers can explain if this is caused by postprocessing (maybe DBE?).

Image 1: https://ibb.co/cX6Lqnz
Image 2: https://ibb.co/6N1c1Ny

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by NGC3314 » Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:19 pm

JKLassitterJr wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:37 pm Question: Why aren't there any light spikes -- that one usually sees in these kinds of photos -- around any of the local stars that are located within our Milky Way galaxy? Surprisingly, the stars in this view are perfect spheres of different sizes, and it is a pleasure to view them this way.
All the telescopes described in the research note for this discovery were (small) refractors, which do not have the central obstructions or supporting struts needed by (most) reflectors for secondary mirrors, so they do not produce the familiar diffraction spikes (caused by an illuminated aperture which is not a uniform circle) ) that reflecting systems do.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by johnnydeep » Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:44 pm

JKLassitterJr wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:37 pm The APOD for 1-17-23 is absolutely spectacular and looks almost like a painting. I've made it my desktop image.

Question: Why aren't there any light spikes -- that one usually sees in these kinds of photos -- around any of the local stars that are located within our Milky Way galaxy? Surprisingly, the stars in this view are perfect spheres of different sizes, and it is a pleasure to view them this way.

Was an app used to filter out the light spikes around the local stars?

JKLJ
The reason there are no spikes is because this image was taken using a refractor, which has no secondary mirror support struts that would have produced the spikes as in a reflector like Hubble or a large Dobsonian! The particular scope used in this case can be seen here: https://takahashiamerica.com/products/t ... -telescope (see this and other details of the hardware and software at the "shown in blue" link from the text).

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by JKLassitterJr » Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:37 pm

The APOD for 1-17-23 is absolutely spectacular and looks almost like a painting. I've made it my desktop image.

Question: Why aren't there any light spikes -- that one usually sees in these kinds of photos -- around any of the local stars that are located within our Milky Way galaxy? Surprisingly, the stars in this view are perfect spheres of different sizes, and it is a pleasure to view them this way.

Was an app used to filter out the light spikes around the local stars?

JKLJ

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by johnnydeep » Thu Jan 19, 2023 4:27 pm

vbasile wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 1:30 pm No relationship with a similarly looking feature present in APOD 19th January 23 (just below center right)?
No, since the text says: "The prominent bluish arc below and right of center is a bow shock from runaway star FN Canis Majoris.", and there's no indication this is any sort of bow shock.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by johnnydeep » Thu Jan 19, 2023 4:23 pm

starsurfer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 11:10 pm
pjw wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:31 am As other have mentioned, the elephant in the room is the uncorrelated H-alpha data when compared to the earlier "deep M31" APOD. If the h-alpha data is real, there should be a good match between the two, but there is not.

As for the OIII no doubt others will be motivated to go deep here to verify these amazing structure.
The OIII structure has already been verified in this image.
Nice. And I can see no sign of a "jet" emanating from near the core of M31 in that image. Hmm...

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by vbasile » Thu Jan 19, 2023 1:30 pm

No relationship with a similarly looking feature present in APOD 19th January 23 (just below center right)?

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by starsurfer » Wed Jan 18, 2023 11:10 pm

pjw wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:31 am As other have mentioned, the elephant in the room is the uncorrelated H-alpha data when compared to the earlier "deep M31" APOD. If the h-alpha data is real, there should be a good match between the two, but there is not.

As for the OIII no doubt others will be motivated to go deep here to verify these amazing structure.
The OIII structure has already been verified in this image.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by pjw » Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:31 am

As other have mentioned, the elephant in the room is the uncorrelated H-alpha data when compared to the earlier "deep M31" APOD. If the h-alpha data is real, there should be a good match between the two, but there is not.

As for the OIII no doubt others will be motivated to go deep here to verify these amazing structure.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by starsurfer » Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:12 pm

Marcel Drechsler is amazing! He and Xavier Strottner as well as Dana Patchick have made hundreds of new discoveries not to mention a few scientific papers!

I find it interesting the OIII arc looks a bit like some of the ionized emission jets in Centaurus A. Maybe M31's black hole had an outburst in the past?

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by NGC3314 » Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:58 pm

Ann wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 7:13 am The strange OIII cloud right next to Andromeda is slightly similar to the (admittedly quite differently shaped and also starforming) feature known as Hanny's Voorwerp near galaxy IC 2497. Hanny's Voorwerp may have formed as a tidal tail was drawn out of IC 2497 by a passing galaxy, and the tidal tail was later illuminated and ionized (and compressed so that it started forming stars) by a jet from the black hole of IC 2497, when the black hole became a quasar as gas fell into it as a consequence of IC 2497's encounter with another galaxy.
I couldn't help wondering right away whether the newly found M31 cloud might be similar to Hanny's Voorwerp. Later work by Galaxy Zoo volunteers uncovered another 20 similar AGN-ionized clouds ("voorwerpjes") already reported, and another 36 have been spectroscopically confirmed but not yet published (some detected out to 100 kpc from the associated galaxy). Most of these are photoionized gas in tidal debris, and most likewise have lower heavy-element abundances than the reference solar value. Because of the nonintuitive fact that [O III] emission becomes relatively stronger for lower oxygen abundance until one gets to maybe 10% of solar, these have [O III]/H-alpha intensity ratios at least as high as 5. That may still be allowed by the limits on H-alpha from the M31 cloud. (The most effective way to get a spectrum might be to put a camera lens in front of a spectrograph and point it that way...)

Many of the Voorwerpje clouds are very filamentary. This is not very quantitative, but to my eye the filaments in the M31 images are smoother and there aren't the distinct clumps usually found in Voorwerpjes.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by AVAO » Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:16 pm

Ann wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 6:50 pm
AVAO wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:56 pm
I see more similarities with NGC 4651 than with IC 2497.

Image

"...The jet-like feature is strikingly coherent and narrow. This feature was previously reported by Vorontsov-Velyaminov (1959) but never interpreted as a stellar tidal stream. Moreover, our deep image shows an additional spectacular crescent shaped shell surrounding the east side of the galaxy that corresponds to the apocenter of the dwarf galaxy. Interestingly, a possible second arc on the western side of the galaxy can also be seen in this image. This structure is less obvious because it is partially hidden by the galaxy's disk. This suggests we are observing a moderately inclined structure projected into the halo of NGC 4651..." https://www.cosmotography.com/images/st ... ights.html
Very good comparison, AVAO!

I found a link to that picture of NGC 4651, and I'm wondering about the insert and the small blue star in brackets. Could that possibly be the core of the small galaxy that was broken up to create that umbrella-like structure of NGC 4651? Although I really wouldn't expect a galactic core to be blue.

And if we are seeing anything even remotely similar in Andromeda, what could the intruding galaxy be? Not, say, M32?

Ann
If I compare the red Hα structures of today's APOD with those of https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap221024.html, the red hallo around M31 is completely missing on today's APOD. the red Hα structure of today's APOD therefore seems to be rather detached from M31 in our galaxy. the OIII shell structure, in turn, does not show any interaction with the red Hα structure. For me, M31, the OIII shell structure and the Hα structure are rather far apart. the fine stripe structure of the OIII shell structure indicates that it could also be very close to us. Research will show in the future.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by johnnydeep » Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:15 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:03 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 7:41 pm Why? We know from other measurements that M31 is approaching the Milky Way, so if this green cloudy wisp WAS close to the M-W, M31 would naturally be approaching it as well, right?
As noted in the paper, what's really needed is a spectroscopic measurement of the cloud, so its Doppler shift can be compared to that of M31. If the two are physically associated, it's likely they will share the same common motion.
I guess that's right, provided the shared motion is not just direction but velocity as well! Although if the cloud is close to the M-W and shares the M-W's motion, both would also share the same motion with respect to M31.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:03 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 7:41 pm Why? We know from other measurements that M31 is approaching the Milky Way, so if this green cloudy wisp WAS close to the M-W, M31 would naturally be approaching it as well, right?
As noted in the paper, what's really needed is a spectroscopic measurement of the cloud, so its Doppler shift can be compared to that of M31. If the two are physically associated, it's likely they will share the same common motion.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by johnnydeep » Tue Jan 17, 2023 7:41 pm

Ann wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:09 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:48 pm Firstly, this is indeed a triumph of amateur astronomy and an incredible image in itself!

But in contrast to Ann, it sure looks to me like these linearly wispy OIII clouds are much closer to us than to Andromeda. I also don't agree that Andromeda's central blackhole is having (or ever had) any effect on it, even if it is "close" to Andromeda, since close here is still probably at least 50,000 ly away.

On another topic, the paper linked to has this to say:
The vector of M31's proper motion measured by GAIA points roughly to the [O iii] emission arc suggesting a possible interaction of M31 with the Milky Way. But the arc seems much too close to M31 to fit that picture.
But I don't understand what this means. How does M31's motion pointing in the apparent direction of the arc suggest anything about how M31 is interacting with the Milky Way?
Doesn't it at least suggest that the green arc is quite close to M31, and not a feature intrinsic to the Milky Way?

Ann
Why? We know from other measurements that M31 is approaching the Milky Way, so if this green cloudy wisp WAS close to the M-W, M31 would naturally be approaching it as well, right?

Oh, and as for the tiny green "jet" apparently emanating from near M31's core and apparently pointing in the direction of the green cloudy wisps, MAYBE it means the two are related, and maybe not. But we don't really know how far that tiny jet is from M31 either.

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by Ann » Tue Jan 17, 2023 6:50 pm

AVAO wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:56 pm
I see more similarities with NGC 4651 than with IC 2497.

Image

"...The jet-like feature is strikingly coherent and narrow. This feature was previously reported by Vorontsov-Velyaminov (1959) but never interpreted as a stellar tidal stream. Moreover, our deep image shows an additional spectacular crescent shaped shell surrounding the east side of the galaxy that corresponds to the apocenter of the dwarf galaxy. Interestingly, a possible second arc on the western side of the galaxy can also be seen in this image. This structure is less obvious because it is partially hidden by the galaxy's disk. This suggests we are observing a moderately inclined structure projected into the halo of NGC 4651..." https://www.cosmotography.com/images/st ... ights.html
Very good comparison, AVAO!

I found a link to that picture of NGC 4651, and I'm wondering about the insert and the small blue star in brackets. Could that possibly be the core of the small galaxy that was broken up to create that umbrella-like structure of NGC 4651? Although I really wouldn't expect a galactic core to be blue.

And if we are seeing anything even remotely similar in Andromeda, what could the intruding galaxy be? Not, say, M32?

Ann

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by Balky » Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:42 pm

Obviously where species 10C resides...

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by Ann » Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:09 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:48 pm Firstly, this is indeed a triumph of amateur astronomy and an incredible image in itself!

But in contrast to Ann, it sure looks to me like these linearly wispy OIII clouds are much closer to us than to Andromeda. I also don't agree that Andromeda's central blackhole is having (or ever had) any effect on it, even if it is "close" to Andromeda, since close here is still probably at least 50,000 ly away.

On another topic, the paper linked to has this to say:
The vector of M31's proper motion measured by GAIA points roughly to the [O iii] emission arc suggesting a possible interaction of M31 with the Milky Way. But the arc seems much too close to M31 to fit that picture.
But I don't understand what this means. How does M31's motion pointing in the apparent direction of the arc suggest anything about how M31 is interacting with the Milky Way?
Doesn't it at least suggest that the green arc is quite close to M31, and not a feature intrinsic to the Milky Way?

Ann

Re: APOD: Unexpected Clouds Toward the Galaxy... (2023 Jan 17)

by AVAO » Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:56 pm

Ann wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:50 pm
AVAO wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 11:51 am In view of the "perceived" 2,537,000 photos of the Andromeda galaxy by astrophotographers on the internet, the photo and the discovery of the so-called "STROTTNER-DRECHSLER-SAINTY OBJECT 1" (the large blue structure) is an absolute sensation. It is the culmination of a search by this group for several years for as yet undiscovered nebulae in the Milky Way galaxy, as their astrobin side impressively shows. The collaboration with several university organizations and professional astrophysicists and researchers in this context for verification and in-depth research is also exciting. This shows that amateur astronomy can now represent an absolutely essential addition to the large observatories such as HUBBLE or WEBB, since their focus is mostly on smaller areas of the sky and shorter exposure times.

Congratulations on this success!

Image
https://www.astrobin.com/1d8ivk/#rH

https://www.astrobin.com/1d8ivk/H/rawthumb/qhd/?sync
Thank you for the links, AVAO!

I love this RGB + OIII (no Hα) version of today's APOD. All the OII features become to incredibly obvious. There is also a hint of a jet, emerging not from the core of Andromeda but not too far away from it:


Strottner Drechsler Sainty Object 1 OIII no Hα.png


Note all the little green planetary nebulas along the outer dust lane of Andromeda! Fantastic!

Yes, and do note the tiny little green jet that seems to point at the amazing Strottner-Drechsler-Sainty Object 1! Could that green jet possibly, possibly have something to do with the large green OIII feature?

Ann
ThanX Ann

I see more similarities with NGC 4651 than with IC 2497.

Image

"...The jet-like feature is strikingly coherent and narrow. This feature was previously reported by Vorontsov-Velyaminov (1959) but never interpreted as a stellar tidal stream. Moreover, our deep image shows an additional spectacular crescent shaped shell surrounding the east side of the galaxy that corresponds to the apocenter of the dwarf galaxy. Interestingly, a possible second arc on the western side of the galaxy can also be seen in this image. This structure is less obvious because it is partially hidden by the galaxy's disk. This suggests we are observing a moderately inclined structure projected into the halo of NGC 4651..." https://www.cosmotography.com/images/st ... ights.html

Top