by MarkBour » Mon Jul 04, 2022 6:56 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:14 pm
I fail to see the problem. The Italian Wikipedia page says the same thing, that the structure is named for its resemblance to a saddle.
The Italian Wikipedia page gave a nice legend explaining the name of the Devil's Saddle. A typically egocentric legend, I see. The APOD caption is not incorrect, it just ignores the legend and gives the fact that an astronomer might find interesting -- that the shape is about the same angular size as a full moon, given the right circumstances, such as in this image. But if you read the APOD caption one way, you might think it is saying that somehow the size of the dip explains its name, which is a bit of a confusion I think Donald was addressing.
And yes, it's a time lapse of the Moon, not the Sun, so again, a possible confusion there that could be cleared up.
I wonder how hard it would have been to take the image from a different vantage point and get the Moon actually rising right through the saddle? And I wonder if that would have made a better image or not.
The English Wikipedia page entry for Devil's Saddle
is not as useful! I guess that's the title of a movie
released about 95 years ago.
Looks like a real doozie.
[quote="Chris Peterson" post_id=323918 time=1656940491 user_id=117706]
[quote=pelletierdonald806@gmail.com post_id=323915 time=1656912519]
and the explanation about the name of the mountain (in Italian : Sella del Diavolo) is not the good one. See Wikipedia italian : https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sella_del_Diavolo
[/quote]
I fail to see the problem. The Italian Wikipedia page says the same thing, that the structure is named for its resemblance to a saddle.
[/quote]
The Italian Wikipedia page gave a nice legend explaining the name of the Devil's Saddle. A typically egocentric legend, I see. The APOD caption is not incorrect, it just ignores the legend and gives the fact that an astronomer might find interesting -- that the shape is about the same angular size as a full moon, given the right circumstances, such as in this image. But if you read the APOD caption one way, you might think it is saying that somehow the size of the dip explains its name, which is a bit of a confusion I think Donald was addressing.
And yes, it's a time lapse of the Moon, not the Sun, so again, a possible confusion there that could be cleared up.
I wonder how hard it would have been to take the image from a different vantage point and get the Moon actually rising right through the saddle? And I wonder if that would have made a better image or not.
[float=right][attachment=0]The_Devil's_Saddle_poster3.jpg[/attachment][/float]
The English Wikipedia page entry for Devil's Saddle
is not as useful! I guess that's the title of a movie
released about 95 years ago.
Looks like a real doozie.