by Chris Peterson » Fri May 28, 2021 1:47 pm
XgeoX wrote: ↑Fri May 28, 2021 1:39 pm
I hate to say this because the good folks here put in a lot of work but the one thing I can’t stand is how we will have days of pretty pictures of the eclipsed moon before and after a lunar eclipse and I just get quite bored of it.
Again, just my opinion but I just wanted to get it off my chest.
Nothing against the incredibly talented photographers or the APOD writeups it’s just a horse that has been whipped so many times...
Eric
Well, astronomical
landscapes with eclipses in them can be quite nice. Today's image, however, is thoroughly uninteresting. And that's nothing against the technical merits of the image. I've got dozens of similar images I've made myself during eclipse. And they're all basically the same: the Moon with a sort of red gradient across it. No different, really, from an uneclipsed Moon. Pretty much, every image of an eclipsed Moon, absent an interesting background, looks about the same.
[quote=XgeoX post_id=313701 time=1622209143 user_id=145282]
I hate to say this because the good folks here put in a lot of work but the one thing I can’t stand is how we will have days of pretty pictures of the eclipsed moon before and after a lunar eclipse and I just get quite bored of it.
Again, just my opinion but I just wanted to get it off my chest.
Nothing against the incredibly talented photographers or the APOD writeups it’s just a horse that has been whipped so many times...
Eric
[/quote]
Well, astronomical [i]landscapes [/i]with eclipses in them can be quite nice. Today's image, however, is thoroughly uninteresting. And that's nothing against the technical merits of the image. I've got dozens of similar images I've made myself during eclipse. And they're all basically the same: the Moon with a sort of red gradient across it. No different, really, from an uneclipsed Moon. Pretty much, every image of an eclipsed Moon, absent an interesting background, looks about the same.