APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Fred the Cat » Sat Feb 05, 2022 4:54 pm

My curiosity is peaked.

Peserverance would pay off with some " golden" hour ingenuity. :thumb_up:

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by neufer » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:01 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_1 wrote:
<<The Vega 1 Lander/Balloon capsule entered the Venus atmosphere (125 km altitude) at 2:06:10 UT (Earth received time; Moscow time 5:06:10 a.m.) on 11 June 1985 at roughly 11 km/s. At approximately 2:06:25 UT the parachute attached to the landing craft cap opened at an altitude of 64 km. The cap and parachute were released 15 seconds later at 63 km altitude. The balloon package was pulled out of its compartment by parachute 40 seconds later at 61 km altitude, at 8.1 degrees N, 176.9 degrees east. A second parachute opened at an altitude of 55 km, 200 seconds after entry, extracting the furled balloon. The balloon was inflated 100 seconds later at 54 km and the parachute and inflation system were jettisoned. The ballast was jettisoned when the balloon reached roughly 50 km and the balloon floated back to a stable height between 53 and 54 km some 15 to 25 minutes after entry.

The mean stable height was 53.6 km, with a pressure of 535 mbar and a temperature of 300–310 K in the middle, most active layer of the Venus three-tiered cloud system. The balloon drifted westward in the zonal wind flow with an average speed of about 69 m/s (248 km/hr) at nearly constant latitude. The probe crossed the terminator from night to day at 12:20 UT on 12 June after traversing 8500 km. The probe continued to operate in the daytime until the final transmission was received at 00:38 UT on 13 June from 8.1 N, 68.8 E after a total traverse distance of 11,600 km or about 30% of the circumference of the planet. It is not known how much farther the balloon traveled after the final communication.>>
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
neufer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:50 pm
The major problem with planetary non-hot air ballooning is with the light hydrogen atmospheres of the gas & ice giants not the heavy CO2 atmospheres of Venus & Mars. E.g., the average surface air pressure on Mars (~610 pascals) is still comparable to the air pressure at an altitude of ~34.5 kilometres above Earth. The Earthly altitude record for an unmanned balloon is 53.0 kilometres (~18.5 km higher), reached with a balloon volume of 60,000 cubic metres. Hence, such a balloon could probably travel anywhere on Mars except for the top Olympus Mons at ~21.3 km.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Forrest White » Tue Apr 06, 2021 6:11 am

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by neufer » Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:16 am

https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/plans-little-known-confederate-helicopter wrote:
Plans for the Little Known Confederate Helicopter
By: Thomas Paone, National Air and Space Museum's Aeronautics Department
Posted on Jan 23, 2013


<<The American Civil War brought about great advances in the use of technology in warfare. Balloons, railroads, ironclad ships, and even a submarine were demonstrated throughout the conflict, and new ideas were constantly being thought up and tried on the battlefield. Some ideas were more exotic than others, such as the one thought of by William C. Powers. In 1862, most of the ports of the Southern states were completely blockaded by Union naval forces, choking off much needed supplies and commerce. William C. Powers was an architectural engineer living in Mobile, Alabama, and personally saw the effects of the Northern blockade. Powers knew that the southern states did not have enough ships to break the blockade with naval power, and going through the blockade was full of risks. William Powers saw another way to crush the blockade – attack it from the air.

Using his engineering skills, Powers began drafting plans for a machine that could lift off and propel itself through the air to attack Union ships. Although balloons were being effectively used for observation, they lacked directional control and could not lift enough weight to make an effective bomber. Powers drew upon the work of other famous engineers, such as Archimedes and da Vinci, and employed Archimedean screws for lift and thrust, all powered by a steam engine. The engine was located in the middle of the craft, and used two smokestacks, which can be seen in the drawings. Two Archimedean screws on the sides gave the helicopter forward thrust, similar to how a propeller works on a ship in water, and two mounted vertically in the helicopter gave it lift. A rudder was added to the rear of the craft in order to provide steering. The drawings below show these Archimedean screws represented by the snaking line that runs across the page.

After drafting his plans, Powers set out to make a small model and then a full-size mockup. Although he had some success creating the small model, as can be seen below, limited resources and lack of support prevented the idea from ever leaving the drawing board. Family lore also says that fear prevented the idea from getting off the ground. When the drawings were donated to the Museum, family members stated that they were hidden during the war to prevent them from falling into Union hands. It was said that a full size example was never created for fear that it would be captured by the Union, mass produced, and used to rain destruction on the Confederate armies and cities throughout the South.

Although the laws of aerodynamics were not on the side of William C. Powers or his helicopter, they do reveal an interesting aspect of the technological advances which came about as a result of the Civil War. Powers even stumbles upon a building method which would be resurrected later on to manufacture airships and even bombers.In the drawing shown below, it is clear that the “hull” of the Powers aircraft would have been constructed using a lattice approach, similar to that used in the British Vickers Wellington Bomber. This provides incredible strength without adding lots of weight.Perhaps Mr. Powers was just ahead of his time…>>

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by VictorBorun » Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:23 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 am A balloon and a drone serve different purposes. The former is substantially a survey probe, with limited control over where it goes. The latter is a precision sampler, which can be directed anyplace. Indeed, it's easy to imagine a hybrid system, where a balloon carries a drone, and drops it for close inspections or sample testing when something interesting is spotted, then carries it on to the next interesting place. A mission like that could operate for a few years.
A Starships' town got an employment: to maintain a fleet of research drone balloons, copters and cars.
Maybe distant-pilot them too; earth-based driving on Mars is taking half an hour to react. But the drivers' team would be more comfortable orbiting Mars.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:21 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:17 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:06 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:59 pm

True dat!
I would add, however... I'm pretty sure that my own skill set would allow me to create such a system here on Earth using nothing but off-the-shelf parts. I think I could make a balloon/drone system where the drone would dock under the balloon where it could drift and charge, detach, fly to the ground to take pictures, and return. Over and over. It's a project well within the abilities of a great many people. The real smarts that would go into such a system on Mars aren't the details of making it work, but the details of making it extremely robust and reliable. Indeed, I'd suggest that an awful lot of the technology that we see on the rovers is more about reliability engineering than it is the basic technology itself.
Ok, so you see this system as the drone having the smarts and maneuverability to return to the balloon and not the balloon needing the ability to return to the drone? If so, that would no doubt be much easier to accomplish. I was imagining the drone stranded on the ground and the balloon having to go pick it up, which frankly sounds ludicrous now that I'm writing it down :ssmile:
If there was a way to make a balloon go anywhere you wanted, you wouldn't need the drone! The system I described for Mars has the balloon drifting subject to the winds, and the drone acting as the inspector when something interesting is nearby.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:17 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:06 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:59 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:23 am
You've seen the system used to put Perseverance on Mars? I think NASA and JPL and the others can do complicated!
True dat!
I would add, however... I'm pretty sure that my own skill set would allow me to create such a system here on Earth using nothing but off-the-shelf parts. I think I could make a balloon/drone system where the drone would dock under the balloon where it could drift and charge, detach, fly to the ground to take pictures, and return. Over and over. It's a project well within the abilities of a great many people. The real smarts that would go into such a system on Mars aren't the details of making it work, but the details of making it extremely robust and reliable. Indeed, I'd suggest that an awful lot of the technology that we see on the rovers is more about reliability engineering than it is the basic technology itself.
Ok, so you see this system as the drone having the smarts and maneuverability to return to the balloon and not the balloon needing the ability to return to the drone? If so, that would no doubt be much easier to accomplish. I was imagining the drone stranded on the ground and the balloon having to go pick it up, which frankly sounds ludicrous now that I'm writing it down :ssmile:

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:06 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:59 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:23 am
johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:18 am

That would be pretty cool. But I could see dropping off and picking up the drone repeatedly being a pretty complicated process.
You've seen the system used to put Perseverance on Mars? I think NASA and JPL and the others can do complicated!
True dat!
I would add, however... I'm pretty sure that my own skill set would allow me to create such a system here on Earth using nothing but off-the-shelf parts. I think I could make a balloon/drone system where the drone would dock under the balloon where it could drift and charge, detach, fly to the ground to take pictures, and return. Over and over. It's a project well within the abilities of a great many people. The real smarts that would go into such a system on Mars aren't the details of making it work, but the details of making it extremely robust and reliable. Indeed, I'd suggest that an awful lot of the technology that we see on the rovers is more about reliability engineering than it is the basic technology itself.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:03 pm

neufer wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:21 am
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Thanks - I think I had watched that over a year ago. The Veritasium channel and it's creator and host Dr. Derek Muller are fantastic.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:59 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:23 am
johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:18 am
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 am

A balloon and a drone serve different purposes. The former is substantially a survey probe, with limited control over where it goes. The latter is a precision sampler, which can be directed anyplace. Indeed, it's easy to imagine a hybrid system, where a balloon carries a drone, and drops it for close inspections or sample testing when something interesting is spotted, then carries it on to the next interesting place. A mission like that could operate for a few years.
That would be pretty cool. But I could see dropping off and picking up the drone repeatedly being a pretty complicated process.
You've seen the system used to put Perseverance on Mars? I think NASA and JPL and the others can do complicated!
True dat!

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by neufer » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:21 am

Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:23 am

johnnydeep wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:18 am
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 am
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:57 pm

For sure. I seem to remember talk of a martian balloon project some years back - maybe sponsored by The Planetary Society? It seems to me a balloon would make a lot more sense than a helicopter and provide more bang for the buck. The material that the Perseverance landing chute was made of strikes me as a great almost indestructible material to make a balloon out of!
A balloon and a drone serve different purposes. The former is substantially a survey probe, with limited control over where it goes. The latter is a precision sampler, which can be directed anyplace. Indeed, it's easy to imagine a hybrid system, where a balloon carries a drone, and drops it for close inspections or sample testing when something interesting is spotted, then carries it on to the next interesting place. A mission like that could operate for a few years.
That would be pretty cool. But I could see dropping off and picking up the drone repeatedly being a pretty complicated process.
You've seen the system used to put Perseverance on Mars? I think NASA and JPL and the others can do complicated!

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:18 am

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 am
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:57 pm
VictorBorun wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:14 pm What place is better for aeronautics, Earth or Mars?

1) To charge solar cells, Earth's sun is hotter on a nice day and dimmer in cloudy weather.
2) To shield against a storm, an Earthern hangar must be as solid as a Martian one.
3) To avoid birds, you have to take care on Earth only.
4) To fly, the Earth's air is more dense, and so rotor blades' velocity can be lower.

All in all I think Earth is somewhat easier to navigate.
For sure. I seem to remember talk of a martian balloon project some years back - maybe sponsored by The Planetary Society? It seems to me a balloon would make a lot more sense than a helicopter and provide more bang for the buck. The material that the Perseverance landing chute was made of strikes me as a great almost indestructible material to make a balloon out of!
A balloon and a drone serve different purposes. The former is substantially a survey probe, with limited control over where it goes. The latter is a precision sampler, which can be directed anyplace. Indeed, it's easy to imagine a hybrid system, where a balloon carries a drone, and drops it for close inspections or sample testing when something interesting is spotted, then carries it on to the next interesting place. A mission like that could operate for a few years.
That would be pretty cool. But I could see dropping off and picking up the drone repeatedly being a pretty complicated process.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 am

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:57 pm
VictorBorun wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:14 pm What place is better for aeronautics, Earth or Mars?

1) To charge solar cells, Earth's sun is hotter on a nice day and dimmer in cloudy weather.
2) To shield against a storm, an Earthern hangar must be as solid as a Martian one.
3) To avoid birds, you have to take care on Earth only.
4) To fly, the Earth's air is more dense, and so rotor blades' velocity can be lower.

All in all I think Earth is somewhat easier to navigate.
For sure. I seem to remember talk of a martian balloon project some years back - maybe sponsored by The Planetary Society? It seems to me a balloon would make a lot more sense than a helicopter and provide more bang for the buck. The material that the Perseverance landing chute was made of strikes me as a great almost indestructible material to make a balloon out of!
A balloon and a drone serve different purposes. The former is substantially a survey probe, with limited control over where it goes. The latter is a precision sampler, which can be directed anyplace. Indeed, it's easy to imagine a hybrid system, where a balloon carries a drone, and drops it for close inspections or sample testing when something interesting is spotted, then carries it on to the next interesting place. A mission like that could operate for a few years.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:06 am

VictorBorun wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:14 pm What place is better for aeronautics, Earth or Mars?

1) To charge solar cells, Earth's sun is hotter on a nice day and dimmer in cloudy weather.
2) To shield against a storm, an Earthern hangar must be as solid as a Martian one.
3) To avoid birds, you have to take care on Earth only.
4) To fly, the Earth's air is more dense, and so rotor blades' velocity can be lower.

All in all I think Earth is somewhat easier to navigate.
A hanger on Mars could be a flimsy tent. Storms create extremely little force.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:02 am

neufer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:50 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:33 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:50 pm
I'm not sure a balloon would have much buoyancy on Mars!?? :shock:
Hmm. Yeah, it might not be as easy as I had thought.

JPL has a few ideas though: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/adv_tech/ball ... erview.htm
The major problem with planetary non-hot air ballooning is with the light hydrogen atmospheres of the gas & ice giants not the heavy CO2 atmospheres of Venus & Mars. E.g., the average surface air pressure on Mars (~610 pascals) is still comparable to the air pressure at an altitude of ~34.5 kilometres above Earth. The Earthly altitude record for an unmanned balloon is 53.0 kilometres (~18.5 km higher), reached with a balloon volume of 60,000 cubic metres. Hence, such a balloon could probably travel anywhere on Mars except for the top Olympus Mons at ~21.3 km.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_1 wrote:
<<The Vega 1 Lander/Balloon capsule entered the Venus atmosphere (125 km altitude) at 2:06:10 UT (Earth received time; Moscow time 5:06:10 a.m.) on 11 June 1985 at roughly 11 km/s. At approximately 2:06:25 UT the parachute attached to the landing craft cap opened at an altitude of 64 km. The cap and parachute were released 15 seconds later at 63 km altitude. The balloon package was pulled out of its compartment by parachute 40 seconds later at 61 km altitude, at 8.1 degrees N, 176.9 degrees east. A second parachute opened at an altitude of 55 km, 200 seconds after entry, extracting the furled balloon. The balloon was inflated 100 seconds later at 54 km and the parachute and inflation system were jettisoned. The ballast was jettisoned when the balloon reached roughly 50 km and the balloon floated back to a stable height between 53 and 54 km some 15 to 25 minutes after entry.

The mean stable height was 53.6 km, with a pressure of 535 mbar and a temperature of 300–310 K in the middle, most active layer of the Venus three-tiered cloud system. The balloon drifted westward in the zonal wind flow with an average speed of about 69 m/s (248 km/hr) at nearly constant latitude. The probe crossed the terminator from night to day at 12:20 UT on 12 June after traversing 8500 km. The probe continued to operate in the daytime until the final transmission was received at 00:38 UT on 13 June from 8.1 N, 68.8 E after a total traverse distance of 11,600 km or about 30% of the circumference of the planet. It is not known how much farther the balloon traveled after the final communication.>>
Thanks, neufer, that is indeed very interesting and relevant info! Actual numbers beat conjecture every time.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by neufer » Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:50 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:33 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:50 pm
I'm not sure a balloon would have much buoyancy on Mars!?? :shock:
Hmm. Yeah, it might not be as easy as I had thought.

JPL has a few ideas though: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/adv_tech/ball ... erview.htm
The major problem with planetary non-hot air ballooning is with the light hydrogen atmospheres of the gas & ice giants not the heavy CO2 atmospheres of Venus & Mars. E.g., the average surface air pressure on Mars (~610 pascals) is still comparable to the air pressure at an altitude of ~34.5 kilometres above Earth. The Earthly altitude record for an unmanned balloon is 53.0 kilometres (~18.5 km higher), reached with a balloon volume of 60,000 cubic metres. Hence, such a balloon could probably travel anywhere on Mars except for the top Olympus Mons at ~21.3 km.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_1 wrote:
<<The Vega 1 Lander/Balloon capsule entered the Venus atmosphere (125 km altitude) at 2:06:10 UT (Earth received time; Moscow time 5:06:10 a.m.) on 11 June 1985 at roughly 11 km/s. At approximately 2:06:25 UT the parachute attached to the landing craft cap opened at an altitude of 64 km. The cap and parachute were released 15 seconds later at 63 km altitude. The balloon package was pulled out of its compartment by parachute 40 seconds later at 61 km altitude, at 8.1 degrees N, 176.9 degrees east. A second parachute opened at an altitude of 55 km, 200 seconds after entry, extracting the furled balloon. The balloon was inflated 100 seconds later at 54 km and the parachute and inflation system were jettisoned. The ballast was jettisoned when the balloon reached roughly 50 km and the balloon floated back to a stable height between 53 and 54 km some 15 to 25 minutes after entry.

The mean stable height was 53.6 km, with a pressure of 535 mbar and a temperature of 300–310 K in the middle, most active layer of the Venus three-tiered cloud system. The balloon drifted westward in the zonal wind flow with an average speed of about 69 m/s (248 km/hr) at nearly constant latitude. The probe crossed the terminator from night to day at 12:20 UT on 12 June after traversing 8500 km. The probe continued to operate in the daytime until the final transmission was received at 00:38 UT on 13 June from 8.1 N, 68.8 E after a total traverse distance of 11,600 km or about 30% of the circumference of the planet. It is not known how much farther the balloon traveled after the final communication.>>

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by orin stepanek » Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:42 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:33 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:50 pm I'm not sure a balloon would have much buoyancy on Mars!?? :shock:
Hmm. Yeah, it might not be as easy as I had thought. JPL has a few ideas though: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/adv_tech/ball ... erview.htm
Balloon Development Challenges for Mars

Ballooning in the Martian atmosphere is complicated by the fact that the Martian carbon dioxide atmosphere is very cold (200 K or -73 degrees C), and it is very thin at 0.006 bar, where 1 bar = 1 atmospheric surface pressure on Earth. In order to fly balloons at Mars, the balloons must be made of very lightweight material.

However, a number of balloon robots, or aerobots, have been proposed for Mars. One simple type is a helium balloon that carries a rope-like snake. During the day, the balloon would be heated by the sun and rise to some altitude above the Martian surface. At night, the balloon would cool, and land on the Martian surface when the landed snake reduces part of the effective mass of the balloon system. Although this type of balloon was proposed in the 1990's, it has never flown due to problems incurred during atmospheric inflation testing and due to fears that the snake might entangle, thus endangering the balloon.

Another type of balloon is a helium superpressure balloon that would fly at a nearly constant altitude for both day and night. The balloon's internal pressure would be higher during the day than at night, although the balloon volume would remain the same. This type of balloon has great potential for long duration flights, possibly several weeks, but a strong, lightweight, leak-proof material must first be developed and successfully tested in a system where the balloon inflates while falling through the Martian atmosphere.

A third type of Martian balloon is known as a solar Montgolfiere, or a solar-heated hot air balloon. This simple, lightweight balloon system shows great promise for long-duration balloon flights over Mar's polar regions during summer, as well as for soft-landing payloads on the Martian surface.
More googling reveals the "snake balloon" concept that was the mars balloon project I was remembering from The Planetary Society. See https://www.planetary.org/planetary-report/tpr-1991-1. You can download that entire issue of The Planetary Report magazine to read the article.
What can I say except wow! I'm still skeptical, but if it works, that's great! So why haven't they used it, or maybe they will?
Thanks for the input!

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:33 pm

orin stepanek wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:50 pm I'm not sure a balloon would have much buoyancy on Mars!?? :shock:
Hmm. Yeah, it might not be as easy as I had thought. JPL has a few ideas though: https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/adv_tech/ball ... erview.htm
Balloon Development Challenges for Mars

Ballooning in the Martian atmosphere is complicated by the fact that the Martian carbon dioxide atmosphere is very cold (200 K or -73 degrees C), and it is very thin at 0.006 bar, where 1 bar = 1 atmospheric surface pressure on Earth. In order to fly balloons at Mars, the balloons must be made of very lightweight material.

However, a number of balloon robots, or aerobots, have been proposed for Mars. One simple type is a helium balloon that carries a rope-like snake. During the day, the balloon would be heated by the sun and rise to some altitude above the Martian surface. At night, the balloon would cool, and land on the Martian surface when the landed snake reduces part of the effective mass of the balloon system. Although this type of balloon was proposed in the 1990's, it has never flown due to problems incurred during atmospheric inflation testing and due to fears that the snake might entangle, thus endangering the balloon.

Another type of balloon is a helium superpressure balloon that would fly at a nearly constant altitude for both day and night. The balloon's internal pressure would be higher during the day than at night, although the balloon volume would remain the same. This type of balloon has great potential for long duration flights, possibly several weeks, but a strong, lightweight, leak-proof material must first be developed and successfully tested in a system where the balloon inflates while falling through the Martian atmosphere.

A third type of Martian balloon is known as a solar Montgolfiere, or a solar-heated hot air balloon. This simple, lightweight balloon system shows great promise for long-duration balloon flights over Mar's polar regions during summer, as well as for soft-landing payloads on the Martian surface.
More googling reveals the "snake tail balloon" concept that was the mars balloon project I was remembering from The Planetary Society. See https://www.planetary.org/planetary-report/tpr-1991-1. You can download that entire issue of The Planetary Report magazine to read the - 30 year old! - article, but here's the cover:

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by orin stepanek » Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:50 pm

I'm not sure a balloon would have much buoyancy on Mars!?? :shock:

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:57 pm

VictorBorun wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:14 pm What place is better for aeronautics, Earth or Mars?

1) To charge solar cells, Earth's sun is hotter on a nice day and dimmer in cloudy weather.
2) To shield against a storm, an Earthern hangar must be as solid as a Martian one.
3) To avoid birds, you have to take care on Earth only.
4) To fly, the Earth's air is more dense, and so rotor blades' velocity can be lower.

All in all I think Earth is somewhat easier to navigate.
For sure. I seem to remember talk of a martian balloon project some years back - maybe sponsored by The Planetary Society? It seems to me a balloon would make a lot more sense than a helicopter and provide more bang for the buck. The material that the Perseverance landing chute was made of strikes me as a great almost indestructible material to make a balloon out of!

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by VictorBorun » Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:14 pm

What place is better for aeronautics, Earth or Mars?

1) To charge solar cells, Earth's sun is hotter on a nice day and dimmer in cloudy weather.
2) To shield against a storm, an Earthern hangar must be as solid as a Martian one.
3) To avoid birds, you have to take care on Earth only.
4) To fly, the Earth's air is more dense, and so rotor blades' velocity can be lower.

All in all I think Earth is somewhat easier to navigate.

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by orin stepanek » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:51 pm

rstevenson wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:59 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:30 pm
You piqued my curiosity (or perseverance!), so I went there (https://www.facebook.com/AstronomyPictureOfTheDay). It's really not so bad - I've seen much worse.
I’ve seen much worse — MUCH worse — elsewhere on FB, but it always distresses me when this sort of egregious nastiness breaks out on APOD on FB. (I’m planning to have a coffee and donut soon. That’ll make feel much better.)

Rob
Go for it Rob; I'm all for the donut & coffee thing! Now I'm hungry!! :b: or beer!

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by rstevenson » Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:59 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:30 pm
You piqued my curiosity (or perseverance!), so I went there (https://www.facebook.com/AstronomyPictureOfTheDay). It's really not so bad - I've seen much worse.
I’ve seen much worse — MUCH worse — elsewhere on FB, but it always distresses me when this sort of egregious nastiness breaks out on APOD on FB. (I’m planning to have a coffee and donut soon. That’ll make feel much better.)

Rob

Re: APOD: Ingenuity: A Mini-Helicopter Now on Mars (2021 Mar 02)

by johnnydeep » Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:30 pm

rstevenson wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:37 am Whatever you do, don’t go to Facebook to read the comments there on today’s APOD. I fear for the future of the human race.

Rob
You piqued my curiosity (or perseverance!), so I went there (https://www.facebook.com/AstronomyPictureOfTheDay). It's really not so bad - I've seen much worse. And to be fair to the human race, the scientific literacy of the vast majority of Facebook posters is far below Starship Asterisk* posters, and fully half of THEM are likely to be trollers looking to get a rise out of the "eggheads". They often succeed :ssmile:

Plus, given the realism of the artistic interpretation, the technological miracles NASA/JPL has a public reputation of pulling off, the fact that many might not know that Percy hosts only one 'copter, and that the description didn't lead with a glaring statement about this being an artist's interpretation of a scene that is impossible to get given the hardware currently on mars, I can forgive honest misunderstandings. But, I have been known to sometimes be too kind. :wink:

Top