APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:49 pm

Joe Walker wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:37 pm I'm trying to understand how the stars in the star cluster move up and down (or in a circle like an orbit around a point in space) as they are riding the gravitational waves. I estimate that they could be moving about 20,000,000 miles from peak to trough (or front to back) and at a frequency of 2,000 Hz (from the LIGO recording). Since they are gaseous wouldn't they just be smeared/obliterated? Or do gravitational waves move tremendous masses at near the speed of light and do no harm to the geometry of the masses? Thanks for any info.
The stars aren't moving. The light from the stars is being distorted so they appear to move from the viewpoint of the camera. Like looking at the distant landscape through a glass you're waving in front of your eyes.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Joe Walker » Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:37 pm

I'm trying to understand how the stars in the star cluster move up and down (or in a circle like an orbit around a point in space) as they are riding the gravitational waves. I estimate that they could be moving about 20,000,000 miles from peak to trough (or front to back) and at a frequency of 2,000 Hz (from the LIGO recording). Since they are gaseous wouldn't they just be smeared/obliterated? Or do gravitational waves move tremendous masses at near the speed of light and do no harm to the geometry of the masses? Thanks for any info.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by neufer » Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:48 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
LeighGus wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:03 pm
If a human were close enough to a black hole merger event, say within a light year or closer, would the human eye perceive spacial distortions from the gravity waves?

... if one was looking at the black holes through a telescope from close range, what would one see? What if one turned the telescope 180° away to look at stars in the local distance, what would we see?
With frequencies of ~100Hz the circularly polarized quadrupolar waves would have ~3,000 km wavelengths such that the circular motions seen at the outskirts of the video at the left would be similar (but rotate in a counter clockwise fashion).

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by BDanielMayfield » Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:37 pm

LeighGus wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:27 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
It seems to me that the comparison is not the same. The two magnets are directly approaching each other and are pulled directly in by the mutual attraction. The two black holes are orbiting each other. The orbits are just unstable enough that they spiral in toward each other and eventually scrape each other and merge. There is insufficient lateral energy for a slingshot to happen.

I do believe that slingshots can and do happen if the two black holes are not captured by each other into orbits. I wonder what the minimum parameters for a slingshot would be. I suppose it depends on their masses, relative velocities, angles of approach, and so on.
Also consider cases of more than two bodies. In cases with three, two are often pulled into a tighter orbit while the third is hurled away. This is also how we use planetary flyby gravity assist maneuvers to accelerate space probes. There is always an "equal and opposite" exchange of momentum in such "slingshots".

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by orin stepanek » Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:38 pm

LeighGus wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:27 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
It seems to me that the comparison is not the same. The two magnets are directly approaching each other and are pulled directly in by the mutual attraction. The two black holes are orbiting each other. The orbits are just unstable enough that they spiral in toward each other and eventually scrape each other and merge. There is insufficient lateral energy for a slingshot to happen.

I do believe that slingshots can and do happen if the two black holes are not captured by each other into orbits. I wonder what the minimum parameters for a slingshot would be. I suppose it depends on their masses, relative velocities, angles of approach, and so on.
I do a lot imaginative thinking! :roll: :mrgreen:

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:33 pm

LeighGus wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:27 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
It seems to me that the comparison is not the same. The two magnets are directly approaching each other and are pulled directly in by the mutual attraction. The two black holes are orbiting each other. The orbits are just unstable enough that they spiral in toward each other and eventually scrape each other and merge. There is insufficient lateral energy for a slingshot to happen.

I do believe that slingshots can and do happen if the two black holes are not captured by each other into orbits. I wonder what the minimum parameters for a slingshot would be. I suppose it depends on their masses, relative velocities, angles of approach, and so on.
In all of these cases, the black holes started as binary stars. So they have always been in closed (elliptical) orbits, and there is no way for that to change without introducing a third massive body- something that is unlikely (outside, perhaps, a system with three close components to begin with).

In the case of a pair of unrelated black holes passing each other, it is exceedingly unlikely that their relative speeds would be below their escape velocities. That is, their orbits would be open (hyperbolic), and again, there is no way to change that without involving a third massive body. So virtually any interaction between a pair of unrelated black holes will result in a slingshot.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by LeighGus » Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:27 pm

orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
It seems to me that the comparison is not the same. The two magnets are directly approaching each other and are pulled directly in by the mutual attraction. The two black holes are orbiting each other. The orbits are just unstable enough that they spiral in toward each other and eventually scrape each other and merge. There is insufficient lateral energy for a slingshot to happen.

I do believe that slingshots can and do happen if the two black holes are not captured by each other into orbits. I wonder what the minimum parameters for a slingshot would be. I suppose it depends on their masses, relative velocities, angles of approach, and so on.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by LeighGus » Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:16 pm

Continuing the question, if one was looking at the black holes through a telescope from close range, what would one see? What if one turned the telescope 180° away to look at stars in the local distance, what would we see?

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by LeighGus » Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:03 pm

If a human were close enough to a black hole merger event, say within a light year or closer, would the human eye perceive spacial distortions from the gravity waves?

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by orin stepanek » Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:36 am

Ann wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 5:00 am
orin stepanek wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:41 am I got another dum dum for ya all! every planet seems to have 2 polls; doesn't a black hole? That's why I asked the first dum dum in the first place! I think art tried to answer that; but I'm not as smart as I used to be! You start getting brain farts when you get my age! :mrgreen:
Hey, Orin, Bruce just answered your question about whether rotating black holes have two poles (they do), but I can't help noticing the expression you used, "brain farts"! (Yes, don't I know the feeling.)

My point is, though, that I spend way too much time on Youtube, and since I try to stimulate my brain cells a little by not just watching cute kittens, I watch some videos on history, too. There is a nice series calling Tasting History, which discusses what people ate at different times and in different places, and then cook their dishes for us, too.

Well, the latest episode I saw was called "Farts of Portingale", can you believe it? These "farts" were popular during Shakespeare's time, and people might have eaten some as they took a break from a performance of Hamlet or Othello! (The audience might have eaten them, I mean, the actors may have stayed on stage instead of having a snack.) The "farts" were basically little meat balls with dates and raisins.

Perhaps better to eat your farts than to have them on your brain!

Ann

😆 https://www.dictionary.com/browse/brain-fart 😏
When you get my age; they even ripen a little :eyebrows:

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Ann » Wed Sep 09, 2020 5:00 am

orin stepanek wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:41 am I got another dum dum for ya all! every planet seems to have 2 polls; doesn't a black hole? That's why I asked the first dum dum in the first place! I think art tried to answer that; but I'm not as smart as I used to be! You start getting brain farts when you get my age! :mrgreen:
Hey, Orin, Bruce just answered your question about whether rotating black holes have two poles (they do), but I can't help noticing the expression you used, "brain farts"! (Yes, don't I know the feeling.)

My point is, though, that I spend way too much time on Youtube, and since I try to stimulate my brain cells a little by not just watching cute kittens, I watch some videos on history, too. There is a nice series calling Tasting History, which discusses what people ate at different times and in different places, and then cook their dishes for us, too.

Well, the latest episode I saw was called "Farts of Portingale", can you believe it? These "farts" were popular during Shakespeare's time, and people might have eaten some as they took a break from a performance of Hamlet or Othello! (The audience might have eaten them, I mean, the actors may have stayed on stage instead of having a snack.) The "farts" were basically little meat balls with dates and raisins.

Perhaps better to eat your farts than to have them on your brain!

Ann

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by BDanielMayfield » Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:11 am

orin stepanek wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:41 am I got another dum dum for ya all! every planet seems to have 2 polls; doesn't a black hole? That's why I asked the first dum dum in the first place! I think art tried to answer that; but I'm not as smart as I used to be! You start getting brain farts when you get my age! :mrgreen:
Since BHs conserve angular momentum they spin, so yes, their event horizons would have two rotational poles just like planets, stars, etc.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by orin stepanek » Wed Sep 09, 2020 12:41 am

I got another dum dum for ya all! every planet seems to have 2 polls; doesn't a black hole? That's why I asked the first dum dum in the first place! I think art tried to answer that; but I'm not as smart as I used to be! You start getting brain farts when you get my age! :mrgreen:

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by BDanielMayfield » Tue Sep 08, 2020 10:06 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:32 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:24 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:12 pm

Hmm, I hadn't realized that a black hole could have a charge. And doesn't it also follow that any such charge must be small, because if it was large, the black hole would be blown apart by electrostatic repulsion, since that force is 1040 times greater than gravity?
How do you blow a singularity apart? It has no volume.
True. Well, maybe I was thinking it could never form in the first place if the infalling matter had too much net charge. Like, it would be pretty hard to form a BH solely out of, say, protons. But I guess that wouldn't stop an already existing BH to eat a stream of protons and keep the charge.
wikipedia/black hole wrote:The no-hair conjecture postulates that, once it achieves a stable condition after formation, a black hole has only three independent physical properties: mass, charge, and angular momentum; the black hole is otherwise featureless. If the conjecture is true, any two black holes that share the same values for these properties, or parameters, are indistinguishable from one another. The degree to which the conjecture is true for real black holes under the laws of modern physics, is currently an unsolved problem.[51]

These properties are special because they are visible from outside a black hole. For example, a charged black hole repels other like charges just like any other charged object. Similarly, the total mass inside a sphere containing a black hole can be found by using the gravitational analog of Gauss's law (through the ADM mass), far away from the black hole.[62] Likewise, the angular momentum (or spin) can be measured from far away using frame dragging by the gravitomagnetic field, through for example the Lense-Thirring effect.[63]
The charge of any BH will be the sum of all the positive (protons) plus the sum of all the negative (electrons) it has ever consumed during it's history. But since protons out mass electrons by 1836:1, could a BH build up charge due to the momentum differences between positive ions and negative electrons in cosmic rays? Just wondering ...

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Stephenwiggins » Tue Sep 08, 2020 7:06 pm

Black holes matter.

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by johnnydeep » Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:32 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:24 pm
johnnydeep wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:12 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:54 pm

There is one caveat to that though: One of the few properties a BH can have is charge. So if two BH where both positively or both negatively charged, there would be an electrostatic force of repulsion working against their gravitational attraction. (Conversely, if the charges where opposite the attraction would be increased.) However, in the real universe it is not likely that BHs will have much charge, so this effect should be negligible.

Bruce
Hmm, I hadn't realized that a black hole could have a charge. And doesn't it also follow that any such charge must be small, because if it was large, the black hole would be blown apart by electrostatic repulsion, since that force is 1040 times greater than gravity?
How do you blow a singularity apart? It has no volume.
True. Well, maybe I was thinking it could never form in the first place if the infalling matter had too much net charge. Like, it would be pretty hard to form a BH solely out of, say, protons. But I guess that wouldn't stop an already existing BH to eat a stream of protons and keep the charge.

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by johnnydeep » Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:28 pm

APOD Robot wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 4:09 am Image GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide

Explanation: How do black holes like this form? The two black holes that spiraled together to produce the gravitational wave event GW190521 were not only the most massive black holes ever seen by LIGO and VIRGO so far, their masses -- 66 and 85 solar masses -- were unprecedented and unexpected. Lower mass black holes, below about 65 solar masses are known to form in supernova explosions. Conversely, higher mass black holes, above about 135 solar masses, are thought to be created by very massive stars imploding after they use up their weight-bearing nuclear-fusion-producing elements. How such intermediate mass black holes came to exist is yet unknown, although one hypothesis holds that they result from consecutive collisions of stars and black holes in dense star clusters. Featured is an illustration of the black holes just before collision, annotated with arrows indicating their spin axes. In the illustration, the spiral waves indicate the production of gravitational radiation, while the surrounding stars highlight the possibility that the merger occurred in a star cluster. Seen last year but emanating from an epoch when the universe was only about half its present age (z ~ 0.8), black hole merger GW190521 is the farthest yet detected, to within measurement errors.
Coincidentally, Scott Manley just did a great video about this BH merger. (He also does pretty good rocket ship news and launch videos, many of which I've watched.) He made the statement that because of the speed of light limit, as the black holes get larger, the period of their orbit has to get longer (start at 2:34). I don't understand that.

Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Also, random stupid question: how strong would a gravitational wave have to be before a person could feel it pass through their body? But I suppose since it travels at the speed of light, we would never notice it no matter how large it was...

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by Chris Peterson » Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:24 pm

johnnydeep wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:12 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:54 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:54 pm

Black holes, being the chunkiest bodies in the universe, would never be repellent.
There is one caveat to that though: One of the few properties a BH can have is charge. So if two BH where both positively or both negatively charged, there would be an electrostatic force of repulsion working against their gravitational attraction. (Conversely, if the charges where opposite the attraction would be increased.) However, in the real universe it is not likely that BHs will have much charge, so this effect should be negligible.

Bruce
Hmm, I hadn't realized that a black hole could have a charge. And doesn't it also follow that any such charge must be small, because if it was large, the black hole would be blown apart by electrostatic repulsion, since that force is 1040 times greater than gravity?
How do you blow a singularity apart? It has no volume.

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by neufer » Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:22 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:54 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:54 pm
De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm
Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
Black holes, being the chunkiest bodies in the universe, would never be repellent.
There is one caveat to that though: One of the few properties a BH can have is charge. So if two BH where both positively or both negatively charged, there would be an electrostatic force of repulsion working against their gravitational attraction. (Conversely, if the charges where opposite the attraction would be increased.) However, in the real universe it is not likely that BHs will have much charge, so this effect should be negligible.
  • Black Holes do have rotating ergospheres, however.

    Dick Caveat around the ergosphere of rotating late night black hole. :arrow:

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by johnnydeep » Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:12 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:54 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:54 pm
De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
Black holes, being the chunkiest bodies in the universe, would never be repellent.
There is one caveat to that though: One of the few properties a BH can have is charge. So if two BH where both positively or both negatively charged, there would be an electrostatic force of repulsion working against their gravitational attraction. (Conversely, if the charges where opposite the attraction would be increased.) However, in the real universe it is not likely that BHs will have much charge, so this effect should be negligible.

Bruce
Hmm, I hadn't realized that a black hole could have a charge. And doesn't it also follow that any such charge must be small, because if it was large, the black hole would be blown apart by electrostatic repulsion, since that force is 1040 times greater than gravity?

Re: Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by BDanielMayfield » Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:54 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:54 pm
De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
Black holes, being the chunkiest bodies in the universe, would never be repellent.
There is one caveat to that though: One of the few properties a BH can have is charge. So if two BH where both positively or both negatively charged, there would be an electrostatic force of repulsion working against their gravitational attraction. (Conversely, if the charges where opposite the attraction would be increased.) However, in the real universe it is not likely that BHs will have much charge, so this effect should be negligible.

Bruce

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by neufer » Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:59 pm

De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm
Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
Humm interesting. I am no physicist, and maybe a physicist can chime in, but that might have a connection to the Grand Unification theory. I understand that unlike the 3 electromagnetic forces, gravity only attracts. It does not repel. So it is likely that two black holes, which are mainly the forces of gravity, would likely collide, instead of repel. But then there are forces that repel, such as star's solar winds and supernovas. Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
If 2 black holes collide it would, indeed, be like 2 strong magnets death spiraling together... and never coming apart :!:

Classical monopoles in electrical or gravitational fields lie in real attractive [-1/r] potential fields counterbalanced by an "effective" repulsive [l2/r2] potential field due to centrifugal forces (where l = angular momentum). This results in Keplerian orbits (rather than death spirals).

Dipole magnets have real attractive [-1/r3] deep potential fields which can't be overwhelmed by an "effective" repulsive [l2/r2] potential field due to centrifugal forces. This results in death spirals.

Likewise: Schwartzchild black holes have real attractive deep potential fields which can't be overwhelmed by an "effective" repulsive [l2/r2] potential field due to centrifugal forces. This results in death spirals.

(Subsidiary forces that repel, such as star's solar winds and supernovas, tend to drop off with distance squared and thereby act as an "effective" repulsive [+1/r] potential field. This too results in Keplerian orbits for classical monopoles.)

Wow, that's a BIG Baby!

by BDanielMayfield » Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:54 pm

De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart?
Humm interesting. I am no physicist, and maybe a physicist can chime in, but that might have a connection to the Grand Unification theory. I understand that unlike the 3 electromagnetic forces, gravity only attracts. It does not repel. So it is likely that two black holes, which are mainly the forces of gravity, would likely collide, instead of repel. But then there are forces that repel, such as star's solar winds and supernovas. Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
I'm more of a farmer than a physicist, but still I can assure y'all that yes, gravity is always a force of attraction between any bodies having mass. (Therefore, contrary to popular opinion, it is a scientific fact that chubby people are more attractive than slender ones :wink: ) Black holes, being the chunkiest bodies in the universe, would never be repellent.

These two BHs, starting out with masses of 85 and 66 suns, actually achieved 8 suns worth of instantaneous weight loss when they merged! 8 solar masses were quickly converted into gravitational energy when the universe's bell was rung announcing the birth of a 143 solar mass baby BH. This announcement of the first ever detection of an intermediate mass BH's birth is being received with great joy in the astrophysical community. :-D :thumb_up:

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by orin stepanek » Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:17 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:12 pm
De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
Humm interesting. I am no physicist, and maybe a physicist can chime in, but that might have a connection to the Grand Unification theory. I understand that unlike the 3 electromagnetic forces, gravity only attracts. It does not repel. So it is likely that two black holes, which are mainly the forces of gravity, would likely collide, instead of repel. But then there are forces that repel, such as star's solar winds and supernovas. Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
Normally, two bodies like this require no opposing force to keep them separate, because they are in orbit around each other (so, moving under the influence of gravity and of inertia). It's no different from the Earth and Moon- no opposing force keeps us separate. What is different here is that a pair of close black holes radiate gravitational energy, which results in their orbits getting smaller- very quickly so when they're nearly touching. But they are still in orbit- it's not like they're being sucked together by gravity, exactly.

I have faith in your knowledge Chris!

Re: APOD: GW190521: Unexpected Black Holes Collide (2020 Sep 08)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:12 pm

De58te wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:57 pm
orin stepanek wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:19 pm GW190521_Virgo_1080.jpg


Oh My!!! Kaboom! 🌪 If 2 black holes collide; would not that be like 2 strong magnets coming together???? Either banging together or sling themselves fast apart? ⁉️ 🤯
Humm interesting. I am no physicist, and maybe a physicist can chime in, but that might have a connection to the Grand Unification theory. I understand that unlike the 3 electromagnetic forces, gravity only attracts. It does not repel. So it is likely that two black holes, which are mainly the forces of gravity, would likely collide, instead of repel. But then there are forces that repel, such as star's solar winds and supernovas. Just wonder how strong the repelling force would have to be between the two black holes in order to repel a black hole?
Normally, two bodies like this require no opposing force to keep them separate, because they are in orbit around each other (so, moving under the influence of gravity and of inertia). It's no different from the Earth and Moon- no opposing force keeps us separate. What is different here is that a pair of close black holes radiate gravitational energy, which results in their orbits getting smaller- very quickly so when they're nearly touching. But they are still in orbit- it's not like they're being sucked together by gravity, exactly.

Top