by Ann » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:06 pm
bystander wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:17 pm
Stellar Sweet Shop
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 2020 Jul 27
Looking its best ever is the star cluster
NGC 2203, here imaged by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. Aside from its dazzling good looks, this
cluster of stars contains lots of astronomical treats that have helped astronomers puzzle together the lifetimes of stars.
A
main sequence star, like our Sun, is the term applied to a star during the longest period of its life, when it burns fuel steadily. Our Sun’s fuel will run out in approximately 6 billion years, and it will then move on to the next stage of its life when it will turn into a
red giant. Astronomers studying NGC 2203, which contains stars that are roughly twice as massive as our Sun, found that their rotation might be a factor as to why some of the stars stay longer than usual in this main-sequence phase of their life.
This is the best resolution obtained of the
star cluster to date.
Wow, that's an amazing cluster!
It has been called both
an open cluster and
a globular cluster. It looks for all the world like a globular cluster to me. Is it possible for an open cluster to contain
so many stars? Or is NGC 2203 so metal-rich that astronomers hesitate to use the same designation for it that is used for old metal-poor vast congregations of stars?
How old is NGC 2203?
Sci News calls it "an intermediate-age open cluster". What's an intermediate-age open cluster?
NGC 188 is one of the oldest open clusters of the Milky Way. According to
Wikipedia, it is 6.8 billion years old. This is very old for an open cluster. So how old is an intermediate-age open cluster? 3 billion years? 2 billion years?
Okay, answer: According to arXiv paper
Nearly coeval intermediate-age Milky Way star clusters at very different dynamics evolutionary stages by Andrés E. Piatti, Mateus S. Angelo and Wilton S. Dias, an intermediate-age cluster is
0.8 - 4 billion years old.
On the other hand, 6.8 billion years is pretty young for a "true" globular cluster. I don't think the Milky Way has any globulars this young.
NGC 2203 is an outlier of the Large Magellanic Cloud. I'm not surprised. A cluster as magnificent as this one would have been well known already if it had been a Milky Way cluster.
Ann
[quote=bystander post_id=304595 time=1595866644 user_id=112005]
[url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw2030a/][size=125][b][i]Stellar Sweet Shop[/i][/b][/size][/url]
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 2020 Jul 27
[quote]
[float=left][img3="Image Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, L. Girardi"]https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/screen/potw2030a.jpg[/img3][/float]Looking its best ever is the star cluster [url=http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+2203]NGC 2203[/url], here imaged by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. Aside from its dazzling good looks, this [url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/archive/category/starclusters/]cluster of stars[/url] contains lots of astronomical treats that have helped astronomers puzzle together the lifetimes of stars.
A [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_sequence]main sequence[/url] star, like our Sun, is the term applied to a star during the longest period of its life, when it burns fuel steadily. Our Sun’s fuel will run out in approximately 6 billion years, and it will then move on to the next stage of its life when it will turn into a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_giant]red giant[/url]. Astronomers studying NGC 2203, which contains stars that are roughly twice as massive as our Sun, found that their rotation might be a factor as to why some of the stars stay longer than usual in this main-sequence phase of their life.
This is the best resolution obtained of the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_cluster]star cluster[/url] to date. [/quote]
[/quote]
Wow, that's an amazing cluster! :shock:
It has been called both [url=http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/hubble-open-cluster-ngc-2203-08677.html]an open cluster[/url] and [url=https://theskylive.com/sky/deepsky/ngc2203-object]a globular cluster.[/url] It looks for all the world like a globular cluster to me. Is it possible for an open cluster to contain [i]so[/i] many stars? Or is NGC 2203 so metal-rich that astronomers hesitate to use the same designation for it that is used for old metal-poor vast congregations of stars?
[float=right][img3="6.8 billion-year-old open cluster NGC 188. Photo: Bernhard Hubl."]http://www.astrophoton.com/images/N0188-1_full.jpg[/img3][/float]How old is NGC 2203? [url=http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/hubble-open-cluster-ngc-2203-08677.html]Sci News[/url] calls it "an intermediate-age open cluster". What's an intermediate-age open cluster?
NGC 188 is one of the oldest open clusters of the Milky Way. According to [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_188]Wikipedia[/url], it is 6.8 billion years old. This is very old for an open cluster. So how old is an intermediate-age open cluster? 3 billion years? 2 billion years?
Okay, answer: According to arXiv paper [i]Nearly coeval intermediate-age Milky Way star clusters at very different dynamics evolutionary stages[/i] by Andrés E. Piatti, Mateus S. Angelo and Wilton S. Dias, an intermediate-age cluster is [b][color=#FF0000]0.8 - 4 billion years old[/color][/b].
On the other hand, 6.8 billion years is pretty young for a "true" globular cluster. I don't think the Milky Way has any globulars this young.
NGC 2203 is an outlier of the Large Magellanic Cloud. I'm not surprised. A cluster as magnificent as this one would have been well known already if it had been a Milky Way cluster.
Ann