by Ann » Wed Apr 24, 2019 2:43 pm
Nitpicker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2019 11:57 am
Ann wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2019 10:17 am
joe25 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2019 9:57 am
Does this 'object' have an NGC designation ?
I guess not.
Wikipedia wrote about the Southern Crab Nebula:
Designations: V852 Cen, Hen 2-104, IRAS 14085-5112, PN G315.4+09.4, Wray 16-147, 2MASS J14115206-5126241
Apparent magnitude (V): 14.20
The Southern Crab Nebula is a 14th magnitude object. I don't think NGC lists objects that are generally fainter than, say, 12th magnitude.
Compare the Southern Crab Nebula with the "real" Crab Nebula, Messier 1. According to
Wikipedia, the Crab Nebula is an 8th magnitude object. A faint 8th magnitude object, admittedly, but the Crab is still almost six magnitudes brighter than the Southern Crab. That's a lot.
Interestingly, the Crab and the Southern Crab appear to be at comparable distances from us, so the fact that the Crab Nebula is almost six magnitudes brighter than its southern "cousin" says something about the relative brightness of these two objects.
Ann
The angular size of the southern crab is roughly five times smaller, I think.
So the difference in surface brightness would not be as great as the magnitude difference suggests, when compared with the northern crab. But I haven't done the sums.
I'm sure you're right, Nit. But that just proves that the small Southern Crab doesn't compensate for its small size by sporting a higher surface brightness, the way the small Orion Nebula does compared with the large but faint Rosette Nebula.
So the Crab pumps out a lot more power than the Southern Crab. Then again, the Southern Crab hasn't gone supernova yet, but the Crab Nebula's pulsar engine - or its progenitor - has.
Ann
[quote=Nitpicker post_id=291721 time=1556107076 user_id=141578]
[quote=Ann post_id=291718 time=1556101031 user_id=129702]
[quote=joe25 post_id=291717 time=1556099857]
Does this 'object' have an NGC designation ?
[/quote]
I guess not.
[quote][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Crab_Nebula]Wikipedia[/url] wrote about the Southern Crab Nebula:
Designations: V852 Cen, Hen 2-104, IRAS 14085-5112, PN G315.4+09.4, Wray 16-147, 2MASS J14115206-5126241
Apparent magnitude (V): 14.20[/quote]
The Southern Crab Nebula is a 14th magnitude object. I don't think NGC lists objects that are generally fainter than, say, 12th magnitude.
Compare the Southern Crab Nebula with the "real" Crab Nebula, Messier 1. According to [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_Nebula]Wikipedia[/url], the Crab Nebula is an 8th magnitude object. A faint 8th magnitude object, admittedly, but the Crab is still almost six magnitudes brighter than the Southern Crab. That's a lot.
Interestingly, the Crab and the Southern Crab appear to be at comparable distances from us, so the fact that the Crab Nebula is almost six magnitudes brighter than its southern "cousin" says something about the relative brightness of these two objects.
Ann
[/quote]
The angular size of the southern crab is roughly five times smaller, I think. [b][color=#0040FF]So the difference in surface brightness would not be as great as the magnitude difference suggests[/color][/b], when compared with the northern crab. But I haven't done the sums.
[/quote]
I'm sure you're right, Nit. But that just proves that the small Southern Crab doesn't compensate for its small size by sporting a higher surface brightness, the way the small Orion Nebula does compared with the large but faint Rosette Nebula.
So the Crab pumps out a lot more power than the Southern Crab. Then again, the Southern Crab hasn't gone supernova yet, but the Crab Nebula's pulsar engine - or its progenitor - has.
Ann