by Ann » Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:24 pm
bystander wrote: ↑Tue Dec 25, 2018 12:14 am
Climbing the Cosmic Distance Ladder
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 208 Dec 24
This image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope reveals an ancient, glimmering ball of stars called
NGC 1466. It is a
globular cluster — a gathering of stars all held together by gravity — that is slowly moving through space on the outskirts of the
Large Magellanic Cloud, one of our closest galactic neighbours.
NGC 1466 certainly is one for extremes. It has a mass equivalent to roughly 140 000 Suns and an age of around 13.1 billion years, making it almost as old as the Universe itself. This fossil-like relic from the early Universe lies some 160 000 light-years away from us.
Nestled within this ancient time capsule are 49 known
RR Lyrae variable stars, which are indispensable tools for measuring distances in the Universe. These variable stars have well-defined
luminosities, meaning that astronomers know the total amount of energy they emit. By comparing this known luminosity to how bright the stars appear in the sky, their distance can be easily calculated. Astronomical objects such as this are known as
standard candles, and are fundamental to the so-called
cosmic distance ladder.
How interesting! NGC 1466 is extremely ancient and presumably
very metal-poor, and it is indeed sufficiently metal-poor to host RR Lyrae variables. More metal-rich globulars, like 47 Tuc, lack RR Lyrae variables.
But no blue horizontal branch stars can be spotted in the ESA/Hubble picture of NGC 1466! In RR Lyrae-rich globulars, the blue horizontal branch stars usually stand out very clearly. They are the "second brightest" kind of stars in most globulars, a lot fainter than the red giants, but clearly brighter than the main sequence stars. Their color also stands out in good color photographs.
How can it be that NGC 1466 lacks blue horizontal branch stars?
Oh. Wait. Maybe it doesn't. When I scrutinized a large version of the picture of NGC 1466, I did indeed spot numerous pale green stars that appear pretty bright. They are the blue horizontal stars?
Most of the stars of the crowded inner part of NGC 1466, by contrast, look quite blue-white.
What filters were used for this image?
Ann
[quote=bystander post_id=288353 time=1545696892 user_id=112005]
[url=https://spacetelescope.org/images/potw1852a/][size=125][b][i]Climbing the Cosmic Distance Ladder[/i][/b][/size][/url]
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 208 Dec 24
[quote]
[float=left][img3="Credit: ESA/Hubble, & NASA"]https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/thumb700x/potw1852a.jpg[/img3][/float]This image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope reveals an ancient, glimmering ball of stars called [url=http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+1466]NGC 1466[/url]. It is a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster]globular cluster[/url] — a gathering of stars all held together by gravity — that is slowly moving through space on the outskirts of the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Magellanic_Cloud]Large Magellanic Cloud[/url], one of our closest galactic neighbours.
NGC 1466 certainly is one for extremes. It has a mass equivalent to roughly 140 000 Suns and an age of around 13.1 billion years, making it almost as old as the Universe itself. This fossil-like relic from the early Universe lies some 160 000 light-years away from us.
Nestled within this ancient time capsule are 49 known [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RR_Lyrae_variable]RR Lyrae variable[/url] stars, which are indispensable tools for measuring distances in the Universe. These variable stars have well-defined [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity]luminosities[/url], meaning that astronomers know the total amount of energy they emit. By comparing this known luminosity to how bright the stars appear in the sky, their distance can be easily calculated. Astronomical objects such as this are known as [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder#Standard_candles]standard candles[/url], and are fundamental to the so-called [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder]cosmic distance ladder[/url]. [/quote]
[/quote]
How interesting! NGC 1466 is extremely ancient and presumably [i]very[/i] metal-poor, and it is indeed sufficiently metal-poor to host RR Lyrae variables. More metal-rich globulars, like 47 Tuc, lack RR Lyrae variables.
But no blue horizontal branch stars can be spotted in the ESA/Hubble picture of NGC 1466! In RR Lyrae-rich globulars, the blue horizontal branch stars usually stand out very clearly. They are the "second brightest" kind of stars in most globulars, a lot fainter than the red giants, but clearly brighter than the main sequence stars. Their color also stands out in good color photographs.
How can it be that NGC 1466 lacks blue horizontal branch stars?
Oh. Wait. Maybe it doesn't. When I scrutinized a large version of the picture of NGC 1466, I did indeed spot numerous pale green stars that appear pretty bright. They are the blue horizontal stars?
Most of the stars of the crowded inner part of NGC 1466, by contrast, look quite blue-white.
What filters were used for this image?
Ann