APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

Up close & personal

by neufer » Mon Dec 03, 2018 7:59 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:58 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:07 pm
Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:52 am
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:26 am
Hmmm ... I suppose if that all happened and we still had a little time and fuel, we could stop the saw, then move it and try again.
How would you feel if it was broken into 4 equal pieces? 10?

I think Tom Lehrer would vote for it ... more pieces ought to make a prettier fireworks show at the end.
Well, I just fear that any attempts to split asteroid Bennu might result in a hailstorm to end all hailstorms on the Earth!
Bennu isn't big enough even as a single impactor to do more than create a big hole in the ground and make a mess of a few hundred square miles. Like a really bad wildfire. Break it up into even a few pieces, and they wouldn't even be large enough to produce craters.

This discussion is more relevant to kilometer scale asteroids.
The ion rocket torque machine on long poles should work just fine on Ryugu, IMO.

162173 Ryugu is a near-Earth object and a potentially hazardous asteroid of the Apollo group.
It measures approximately 1 kilometer in diameter.


Give me the place to stand, and I shall move the earth.
- Said to be Archimedes's assertion in demonstrating the principle of the lever; as quoted by Pappus of Alexandria, Synagoge, Book VIII, c. AD 340

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:07 pm

Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:52 am
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:26 am
Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.
Ann
Hmmm ... I suppose if that all happened and we still had a little time and fuel, we could stop the saw, then move it and try again.
How would you feel if it was broken into 4 equal pieces? 10?

I think Tom Lehrer would vote for it ... more pieces ought to make a prettier fireworks show at the end.
Well, I just fear that any attempts to split asteroid Bennu might result in a hailstorm to end all hailstorms on the Earth!

Ann
Bennu isn't big enough even as a single impactor to do more than create a big hole in the ground and make a mess of a few hundred square miles. Like a really bad wildfire. Break it up into even a few pieces, and they wouldn't even be large enough to produce craters.

This discussion is more relevant to kilometer scale asteroids.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:35 pm

Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:52 am
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:26 am
Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am
I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.
Hmmm ... I suppose if that all happened and we still had a little time and fuel, we could stop the saw, then move it and try again.
How would you feel if it was broken into 4 equal pieces? 10?

I think Tom Lehrer would vote for it ... more pieces ought to make a prettier fireworks show at the end.
Well, I just fear that any attempts to split asteroid Bennu might result in a hailstorm to end all hailstorms on the Earth!
A lot of Chelyabinsk superbolide windows broken but, at least, everyone will be prepared this time.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Ann » Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:52 am

MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:26 am
Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.
Ann
Hmmm ... I suppose if that all happened and we still had a little time and fuel, we could stop the saw, then move it and try again.
How would you feel if it was broken into 4 equal pieces? 10?

I think Tom Lehrer would vote for it ... more pieces ought to make a prettier fireworks show at the end.
Well, I just fear that any attempts to split asteroid Bennu might result in a hailstorm to end all hailstorms on the Earth!

Ann

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:26 am

Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.
Ann
Hmmm ... I suppose if that all happened and we still had a little time and fuel, we could stop the saw, then move it and try again.
How would you feel if it was broken into 4 equal pieces? 10?

I think Tom Lehrer would vote for it ... more pieces ought to make a prettier fireworks show at the end.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:33 am

Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Ann wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:06 am
neufer wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:18 pm
an interesting alternative (non-bomb) solution in a case like
Bennu might be to slowly spin it up until it tears itself apart.
I'd be reluctant to put my life on the line with a solution of this nature. After a couple of years, might we not find the situation that we have a spinning saw blade, doing almost nothing, but rotating in between two relatively unaffected, slightly-separated piles of rubble?
I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Ann » Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:52 am

MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:06 am
neufer wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:18 pm However, an interesting alternative (non-bomb) solution in a case
like Bennu might be to slowly spin it up until it tears itself apart:
... Bennu would be torn apart long before its rotational period got down to 39 minutes.
(In spite of the appearance in the post id=287393, I think this is neufer, I am quoting here.)

I'd be reluctant to put my life on the line with a solution of this nature. After a couple of years, might we not find the situation that we have a spinning saw blade, doing almost nothing, but rotating in between two relatively unaffected, slightly-separated piles of rubble?
I think the Earth would be worse off if two piles of rubble came careening our way than if a single asteroid came for a visit.

Ann

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:06 am

neufer wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:18 pm However, an interesting alternative (non-bomb) solution in a case
like Bennu might be to slowly spin it up until it tears itself apart:
... Bennu would be torn apart long before its rotational period got down to 39 minutes.
(In spite of the appearance in the post id=287393, I think this is neufer, I am quoting here.)

I'd be reluctant to put my life on the line with a solution of this nature. After a couple of years, might we not find the situation that we have a spinning saw blade, doing almost nothing, but rotating in between two relatively unaffected, slightly-separated piles of rubble?

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by skyy_strukk » Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:48 pm

Asteroid Bennu would make a fine conversation piece in any meteorite collection.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:18 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:29 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 4:53 pm
neufer wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:26 pm
Given two asteroids of equal mass and Earth impacting trajectory, one of which is a loose rubble pile and
one is a solid body, which poses the greater threat, and which threat would be easier to ward off?
It depends on the mass. Above a certain point, the composition won't make much difference in terms of impact damage. At smaller sizes (maybe a few hundred meters or less) the lower porosity object may break up higher, with less mass reaching the ground at a hypersonic velocity. An airburst can cause a lot of local damage, but a large impact affects the entire planet.

Which one is easier to deal with while still in space probably depends upon the method used. Using some kind of thrusters seems likely to be best for a solid body. Fragmenting it with a bomb might be best for a rubble pile. Methods like painting one side or parking a big mass in orbit around it should work about the same for either.
The (nuclear) bomb solution is no doubt the simplest option for a rubble pile.

However, an interesting alternative (non-bomb) solution in a case
like Bennu might be to slowly spin it up until it tears itself apart:
.................................................................................
Experimental ion thrusters have now achieved 5N.

A solar powered pair of such thrusters over 4 decades could produce
a total impulse of ~12,600,000,000 Ns (using just ~200 tonnes of propellant).

Connecting such a pair of thrusters by a 550 m equatorial shaft through the center of Bennu
could be used to decrease its rotational period from 4.288 h down to just ~39 minutes.

And Bennu would be torn apart long before its rotational period got down to 39 minutes.
.................................................................................
11 km high carbon fiber towers connected to the 550 m equatorial shaft
would reduce the necessary thrust & fuel by a factor of 40 !

This permits all sorts of interesting possibilities...
... includes having a single (tacking) solar sail do the job.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:29 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 4:53 pm
neufer wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:26 pm My own plan is to talk Bennu to death.
In furtherance of neufer's (laudable,laughable?) plan I'll pose a hypothetical question, to wit:

Given two asteroids of equal mass and Earth impacting trajectory, one of which is a loose rubble pile and one is a solid body, which poses the greater threat, and which threat would be easier to ward off?
It depends on the mass. Above a certain point, the composition won't make much difference in terms of impact damage. At smaller sizes (maybe a few hundred meters or less) the lower higher porosity object may break up higher, with less mass reaching the ground at a hypersonic velocity. An airburst can cause a lot of local damage, but a large impact affects the entire planet.

Which one is easier to deal with while still in space probably depends upon the method used. Using some kind of thrusters seems likely to be best for a solid body. Fragmenting it with a bomb might be best for a rubble pile. Methods like painting one side or parking a big mass in orbit around it should work about the same for either.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Whomever » Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:20 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 4:53 pm
neufer wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:26 pm My own plan is to talk Bennu to death.
In furtherance of neufer's (laudable,laughable?) plan I'll pose a hypothetical question, to wit:

Given two asteroids of equal mass and Earth impacting trajectory, one of which is a loose rubble pile and one is a solid body, which poses the greater threat, and which threat would be easier to ward off?
The rock would be much easier to talk down since there's only one. You couldn't get a whole pile of rocks to agree on anything with each other let alone with a fast talking logophile (except of course their mutual attraction).

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by BDanielMayfield » Fri Nov 16, 2018 4:53 pm

neufer wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:26 pm My own plan is to talk Bennu to death.
In furtherance of neufer's (laudable,laughable?) plan I'll pose a hypothetical question, to wit:

Given two asteroids of equal mass and Earth impacting trajectory, one of which is a loose rubble pile and one is a solid body, which poses the greater threat, and which threat would be easier to ward off?

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:26 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 5:20 am
neufer wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:22 pm ...
However, I was primarily interested with any possible perturbation with current OSIRIS-Rex activities
affecting the next close approach in 2060 (~104 years after the last relatively close approach in 1956).
...
Actually, a catapult that could launch 0.1% of Bennu rocks at 110 m/s makes a lot of sense.
(Or having Bruce Willis bury a nuclear charge to blow off the front or back 0.1% of Bennu into space.)
...
All plans on moving asteroids involve having it sped up or slowed down in order to throw the timing off.
In reality, however, you don't necessarily need anywhere near that impulse... or, you need a lot more. We don't know where Bennu will be a few orbits from now. A trivially small impulse now could have a dramatic effect on its position in 100 years. We wouldn't be able to do anything until a collision was much nearer in time, and then we'd have to do more, of course.
My own plan is to talk Bennu to death.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by Chris Peterson » Fri Nov 16, 2018 5:20 am

MarkBour wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:49 am
neufer wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:22 pm ...
However, I was primarily interested with any possible perturbation with current OSIRIS-Rex activities
affecting the next close approach in 2060 (~104 years after the last relatively close approach in 1956).
...
Actually, a catapult that could launch 0.1% of Bennu rocks at 110 m/s makes a lot of sense.
(Or having Bruce Willis bury a nuclear charge to blow off the front or back 0.1% of Bennu into space.)
...
All plans on moving asteroids involve having it sped up or slowed down in order to throw the timing off.
Thanks for the answers!
In reality, however, you don't necessarily need anywhere near that impulse... or, you need a lot more. We don't know where Bennu will be a few orbits from now. A trivially small impulse now could have a dramatic effect on its position in 100 years. We wouldn't be able to do anything until a collision was much nearer in time, and then we'd have to do more, of course.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Fri Nov 16, 2018 4:03 am

MarkBour wrote: Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:49 am
neufer wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:22 pm ...
However, I was primarily interested with any possible perturbation with current OSIRIS-Rex activities
affecting the next close approach in 2060 (~104 years after the last relatively close approach in 1956).
...
Actually, a catapult that could launch 0.1% of Bennu rocks at 110 m/s makes a lot of sense.
(Or having Bruce Willis bury a nuclear charge to blow off the front or back 0.1% of Bennu into space.)
...
All plans on moving asteroids involve having it sped up or slowed down in order to throw the timing off.
Thanks for the answers!

RE: A catapult. If Bennu is truly rubble, I really like the simplicity of the idea, and it would be able to do a little at a time until it got the job done, perhaps not needing fuel? So, it is a brilliant plan on those features, at least.

A catapult would not change the total net momentum, of course. It sounds like it would effectively turn it into a disintegrating "comet". And the way I'm picturing this, it would just make a huge mess out of the launched chunks, as a sort of discrete cometary tail, right? I suppose some of those pieces would have to hit Earth, even as they would allow Bennu's main body to miss. On the bright side, maybe there is something worth mining and trying to get into Earth orbit. Or to even crash into the Moon. Would anyone ever want to play that dangerous game with large chunks? I can scarce imagine the possible long-term effects of such actions.

Anyway, if you send Bruce Willis to do the job, keep in mind that you're going to need to send his whole crew. Non-negotiable. They needed Ben Affleck ("A.J. saved us. He did."), and even more importantly, they needed Steve Buscemi for comic relief.
If the catapult could do the job at hand within the first few years then:
  • 1) Bennu would be moved by ~0.001 au by 2060 and
    2) the ejecta would all be moved by ~1.00 au in the opposite direction by 2060.
OTOH: If Bruce, Ben & Steve did a high precision job then
the ejecta would be spread out from 0 to 2 au in the opposite direction by 2060.

Either case would be preferable to inaction IMO.

Note that speeding up or slowing down Bennu produces a cumulative effect over the full 4 decades until 2060;
whereas changing the direction of Bennu is only effective for a quarter of an orbit (i.e., 0.30 years).

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:49 am

neufer wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:22 pm ...
However, I was primarily interested with any possible perturbation with current OSIRIS-Rex activities
affecting the next close approach in 2060 (~104 years after the last relatively close approach in 1956).
...
Actually, a catapult that could launch 0.1% of Bennu rocks at 110 m/s makes a lot of sense.
(Or having Bruce Willis bury a nuclear charge to blow off the front or back 0.1% of Bennu into space.)
...
All plans on moving asteroids involve having it sped up or slowed down in order to throw the timing off.
Thanks for the answers!

RE: A catapult. If Bennu is truly rubble, I really like the simplicity of the idea, and it would be able to do a little at a time until it got the job done, perhaps not needing fuel? So, it is a brilliant plan on those features, at least.

A catapult would not change the total net momentum, of course. It sounds like it would effectively turn it into a disintegrating "comet". And the way I'm picturing this, it would just make a huge mess out of the launched chunks, as a sort of discrete cometary tail, right? I suppose some of those pieces would have to hit Earth, even as they would allow Bennu's main body to miss. On the bright side, maybe there is something worth mining and trying to get into Earth orbit. Or to even crash into the Moon. Would anyone ever want to play that dangerous game with large chunks? I can scarce imagine the possible long-term effects of such actions.

Anyway, if you send Bruce Willis to do the job, keep in mind that you're going to need to send his whole crew. Non-negotiable. They needed Ben Affleck ("A.J. saved us. He did."), and even more importantly, they needed Steve Buscemi for comic relief.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:22 pm

MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:22 pm
I just stumbled upon the site: https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ which I find really wonderful. They have a nice set of data and you can run the data in animations for many near-earth objects. I could learn a lot from that site, if I were to give it the time it deserves. What I did learn is that 101955 Bennu has an elliptical orbit similar to Musk's roadster -- running from just a little inside Earth's orbit to nearly Mars' orbit. But I don't think it ever has close encounters with Mars, it is probably not in Mars' orbital plane when it approaches. It can get arbitrarily close to Earth, crossing our orbit, and the close encounters should be about once every 6 years or so.

Back to your momentum calculation. I'll gladly accept that you did the math to determine that it would take an impulse of about 7.5x109 Ns to slow Bennu enough to displace it by 0.001 AU. I assume you figured this displacement in a period that would be about 5 orbits for Bennu = 6 orbits for Earth. (?) And that much displacement ought to be enough to avoid an encounter.
  • Bennu has an orbital period of ~436.65 days or ~104/87 years

    After 5 Bennu orbits (~6 years) the Earth lags by ~0.12 au (too far to matter).

    After 87 Bennu orbits (~104 years) the Earth leads by ~0.03 au.
However, I was primarily interested with any possible perturbation with current OSIRIS-Rex activities
affecting the next close approach in 2060 (~104 years after the last relatively close approach in 1956).
  • Note: Bennu's orbital period of ~436.65 days changes after each relatively
    close approach making the next close approach after just 75 years (in 2135).
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:22 pm
The first stage of the Saturn V, I believe, could deliver 9x109 Ns impulse, so that would mean we must have the capability, in theory, to give such a push with conventional tech. Of course it is a lot easier to build and launch a Saturn V from Florida than to deliver a working Saturn V to an object in space, fully loaded with fuel. So this would require a lot more rockets and would beg a myriad of other questions as well.
Actually, a catapult that could launch 0.1% of Bennu rocks at 110 m/s makes a lot of sense.
(Or having Bruce Willis bury a nuclear charge to blow off the front or back 0.1% of Bennu into space.)
MarkBour wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:22 pm
(Examples: When would be the best time for such a mission. I assume it would be most efficient to try to intercept it at perigee #(n-1), if we wanted to push it with something between then and perigee #n? If we wanted to move such a pile of rubble, we might rather separate all of the engines of a Falcon-Heavy-like rocket and place them all in a large array. Build something more like a rocket-powered girdle. I wonder if nudging such an object out of our orbital plane is easier than nudging it backward or forward? It would seem a more permanent solution, upon first consideration. Then again, adjusting its perihelion to be > Earth's aphelion is another idea.
All plans on moving asteroids involve having it sped up or slowed down in order to throw the timing off.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:19 pm

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/hey-bennu-have-we-met-i-never-forget-an-asteroid wrote:
101955 Bennu / 162173 Ryugu

Hey Bennu, have we met?
I never forget an asteroid.

Contributed by Phil Plait @BadAstron

:arrow: Comparing two small asteroids: 550-m-wide Bennu (left), and 1-km-wide Ryugu (right) roughly to scale.

Credit: Ryugu: JAXA, University of Tokyo, Kochi University, Rikkyo University, Nagoya University, Chiba Institute of Technology, Meiji University, University of Aizu and AIST.
I might have thought so, once long ago, but now I cannot make this boast.
The other day I ran into 10164472, and completely mistook her for 1829147c. Really embarrassing. :P

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:13 pm

gwarstadt wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:07 pm Is anyone else struck by the fact that the horizontal axis of this non spherical object is exactly half the vertical axis, and its so symmetrical that if you watch an edge as it rotates the profile hardly moves (except for the big rocks)?
The image I am looking at is about 426px tall and 396px wide, so it is relatively close to 1:1, not 1:2.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by MarkBour » Thu Nov 15, 2018 8:22 pm

neufer wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 2:46 pm
Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:14 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:18 pm
Better not bump it too hard... Imagine the liability if it was accidentally pushed into an Earth intersecting orbit... The ultimate butterfly effect.
Of course, the tiniest bump could as easily prevent a collision with Earth. That's the thing about chaos theory. No way to tell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101955_Bennu wrote:
  1. Bennu will pass 0.005au from Earth on 23 September 2060. The close approach of 2060 causes divergence in the close approach of 2135.

    2. On 25 September 2135 the nominal approach distance is 0.002au from Earth, but Bennu could pass as close as 0.0007au.
    (There is no chance of an Earth impact in 2135.)

    3. The 2135 approach will create many lines of variations and Bennu may pass through a gravitational keyhole during the 2135 passage which could create an impact scenario at a future encounter. The keyholes are all less than 55 km wide.
In order to move Bennu by ~0.001au before its next encounter with Earth Bennu's velocity must be sped up or slowed down by ~11 cm/sec.

This would require a momentum impulse of ~7,500,000,000 kg m/sec.

The Paris Gun used to bombard Paris during World War I generated a momentum impulse of ~175,000 kg m/sec.

Hence, a Bennu/Paris Gun would have to discharge over 40,000 times to have a significant effect for the near future.
I just stumbled upon the site: https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/ which I find really wonderful. They have a nice set of data and you can run the data in animations for many near-earth objects. I could learn a lot from that site, if I were to give it the time it deserves. What I did learn is that 101955 Bennu has an elliptical orbit similar to Musk's roadster -- running from just a little inside Earth's orbit to nearly Mars' orbit. But I don't think it ever has close encounters with Mars, it is probably not in Mars' orbital plane when it approaches. It can get arbitrarily close to Earth, crossing our orbit, and the close encounters should be about once every 6 years or so.

Back to your momentum calculation. I'll gladly accept that you did the math to determine that it would take an impulse of about 7.5x109 Ns to slow Bennu enough to displace it by 0.001 AU. I assume you figured this displacement in a period that would be about 5 orbits for Bennu = 6 orbits for Earth. (?) And that much displacement ought to be enough to avoid an encounter. The first stage of the Saturn V, I believe, could deliver 9x109 Ns impulse, so that would mean we must have the capability, in theory, to give such a push with conventional tech.

Of course it is a lot easier to build and launch a Saturn V from Florida than to deliver a working Saturn V to an object in space, fully loaded with fuel. So this would require a lot more rockets and would beg a myriad of other questions as well.

(Examples: When would be the best time for such a mission. I assume it would be most efficient to try to intercept it at perigee #(n-1), if we wanted to push it with something between then and perigee #n? If we wanted to move such a pile of rubble, we might rather separate all of the engines of a Falcon-Heavy-like rocket and place them all in a large array. Build something more like a rocket-powered girdle. I wonder if nudging such an object out of our orbital plane is easier than nudging it backward or forward? It would seem a more permanent solution, upon first consideration. Then again, adjusting its perihelion to be > Earth's aphelion is another idea.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:19 pm

gwarstadt wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:07 pm
Is anyone else struck by the fact that the horizontal axis [sic...you mean radius ?] of this non spherical object is exactly half the vertical axis, and its so symmetrical that if you watch an edge as it rotates the profile hardly moves (except for the big rocks)?
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/hey-bennu-have-we-met-i-never-forget-an-asteroid wrote:
101955 Bennu / 162173 Ryugu



Hey Bennu, have we met?
I never forget an asteroid.

Contributed by Phil Plait @BadAstron

:arrow: Comparing two small asteroids: 550-m-wide Bennu (left), and 1-km-wide Ryugu (right) roughly to scale.

Credit: Ryugu: JAXA, University of Tokyo, Kochi University, Rikkyo University, Nagoya University, Chiba Institute of Technology, Meiji University, University of Aizu and AIST.
101955 Bennu / Earth

162173 Ryugu / Earth



Note that both retrograde rotating asteroids (i.e., Bennu & Ryugu) have (in the past) regularly passed through Earth's L5 Lagrangian point before then passing sun-wards of the Earth.

Have these asteroids picked up (co-moving) dust trapped in Earth's L5 Lagrangian point (and/or generated a cloud of dust due to larger impacts).

And have such captured dust clouds been immediately given a clockwise rotational spin by passing sun-wards of the Earth :?:

Such retrograde rotating dust rings would then slowly be deposited onto the asteroids so as to define their equators.

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by gwarstadt » Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:07 pm

Is anyone else struck by the fact that the horizontal axis of this non spherical object is exactly half the vertical axis, and its so symmetrical that if you watch an edge as it rotates the profile hardly moves (except for the big rocks)?

Re: APOD: Rotating Asteroid Bennu from OSIRIS-REx (2018 Nov 13)

by neufer » Wed Nov 14, 2018 2:46 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:14 pm
BDanielMayfield wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:18 pm
Better not bump it too hard... Imagine the liability if it was accidentally pushed into an Earth intersecting orbit... The ultimate butterfly effect.
Of course, the tiniest bump could as easily prevent a collision with Earth. That's the thing about chaos theory. No way to tell.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101955_Bennu wrote:
  1. Bennu will pass 0.005au from Earth on 23 September 2060. The close approach of 2060 causes divergence in the close approach of 2135.

    2. On 25 September 2135 the nominal approach distance is 0.002au from Earth, but Bennu could pass as close as 0.0007au.
    (There is no chance of an Earth impact in 2135.)

    3. The 2135 approach will create many lines of variations and Bennu may pass through a gravitational keyhole during the 2135 passage which could create an impact scenario at a future encounter. The keyholes are all less than 55 km wide.
In order to move Bennu by ~0.001au before its next encounter with Earth Bennu's velocity must be sped up or slowed down by ~11 cm/sec.

This would require a momentum impulse of ~7,500,000,000 kg m/sec.

The Paris Gun used to bombard Paris during World War I generated a momentum impulse of ~175,000 kg m/sec.

Hence, a Bennu/Paris Gun would have to discharge over 40,000 times to have a significant effect for the near future.

Top