by Ann » Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:58 am
Today's APOD reminds me of July 20, 1969, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first human beings to land on the Moon. I remember seeing what I guess was Neil Armstrong filming Buzz Aldrin as he descended from the lunar module to set foot on the Moon.
What I really remember was that the transmission quality was beyond awful, and I had no idea what I was seeing and hearing. Okay, my English was lousy back in 1969, but the sound quality, too, was horrendous. "One small step for a man, but a giant leap for mankind" - say that again, Neil, OK?
In later years, when so many people have begun questioning the Moon landing, I have come to think of the terrible quality of the transmission as one brilliant piece of evidence that the Moon landing was for real. Because if Hollywood had staged the whole thing, there is no way they would have allowed a fake Moon landing to look and sound so bad!
So, back to today's APOD. It looks pretty terrible to me. So I guess that, given what else we have reason to think we know about the Hayabusa2 mission to Asteroid Ryugu, the terrible quality of the picture suggests that the scene "depicted" - or something - is authentic. The image quality may be at least corollary evidence that Rover 1A really made it to this asteroid and is really hopping around there, while its asteroid visitor buddy (the Buzz Aldrin rover? Rover 1B?) is trying and failing to take a good picture of its rover mate!
Ann
Today's APOD reminds me of July 20, 1969, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first human beings to land on the Moon. I remember seeing what I guess was Neil Armstrong filming Buzz Aldrin as he descended from the lunar module to set foot on the Moon.
What I really remember was that the transmission quality was beyond awful, and I had no idea what I was seeing and hearing. Okay, my English was lousy back in 1969, but the sound quality, too, was horrendous. "One small step for a man, but a giant leap for mankind" - say that again, Neil, OK?
In later years, when so many people have begun questioning the Moon landing, I have come to think of the terrible quality of the transmission as one brilliant piece of evidence that the Moon landing was for real. Because if Hollywood had staged the whole thing, there is no way they would have allowed a fake Moon landing to look and sound so bad!
So, back to today's APOD. It looks pretty terrible to me. So I guess that, given what else we have reason to think we know about the Hayabusa2 mission to Asteroid Ryugu, the terrible quality of the picture suggests that the scene "depicted" - or something - is authentic. The image quality may be at least corollary evidence that Rover 1A really made it to this asteroid and is really hopping around there, while its asteroid visitor buddy (the Buzz Aldrin rover? Rover 1B?) is trying and failing to take a good picture of its rover mate!
Ann