APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by geckzilla » Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:31 pm

alter-ego wrote: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:49 am
geckzilla wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:38 pm
alter-ego wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:06 pm

Yes, but it would be a simulation needing additional image data to be accurate. I can see a telescopic image from Earth taken at an animated image frame time, and then overlaid on the modeled 2D mosaic. LRO imagery alone won't provide enough information to accurately render an eclipse.
I disagree. Accurate coordinates for each object (Sun, Earth, Moon) and a physics-based renderer would not be any less "accurate" than what is already rendered.
I'm not sure if our lines are getting crossed.
No question the LRO mosaics are presented as accurate as they can be. What isn't rendered in the video is the total eclipse. Physics and ephemerides aren't the limiting factors to simulate a total eclipse (I treat "simulate" and "reproduce" the same). I'll say that present prediction / analysis capabilities could reproduce good partial eclipse simulations, but not for total eclipses. To generate accurate color reproduction for total eclipse requires data we don't know well enough (yet). We know that total eclipse color and brightness strongly depends on the integrated atmospheric conditions around the Earth's perimeter. They include clouds, aerosols and moisture. To my knowledge, these parameters cannot be modeled well enough to accurately predict / simulate color and brightness distribution on the fully eclipsed moon. This reasoning is behind my comment that augmenting the LRO mosaic with a full-disk color image of the moon (colors digitized with selenographic coordinates) may yield an accurate reproduction.

With that said, the LRO WAC can capture one good color 60-km swath across the eclipsed surface during it's 2-hr orbit. Maybe that data could "nudge" a predicted color/brightness distribution closer to reality, but I doubt it would be that good.
An eclipse within a few percent margin of error isn't really any different than what's already being presented.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by alter-ego » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:49 am

geckzilla wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:38 pm
alter-ego wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:06 pm
geckzilla wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am ...
Anyway, it's totally possible to put the eclipse into the simulation. One need only include a properly placed Earth...
Yes, but it would be a simulation needing additional image data to be accurate. I can see a telescopic image from Earth taken at an animated image frame time, and then overlaid on the modeled 2D mosaic. LRO imagery alone won't provide enough information to accurately render an eclipse.
I disagree. Accurate coordinates for each object (Sun, Earth, Moon) and a physics-based renderer would not be any less "accurate" than what is already rendered.
I'm not sure if our lines are getting crossed.
No question the LRO mosaics are presented as accurate as they can be. What isn't rendered in the video is the total eclipse. Physics and ephemerides aren't the limiting factors to simulate a total eclipse (I treat "simulate" and "reproduce" the same). I'll say that present prediction / analysis capabilities could reproduce good partial eclipse simulations, but not for total eclipses. To generate accurate color reproduction for total eclipse requires data we don't know well enough (yet). We know that total eclipse color and brightness strongly depends on the integrated atmospheric conditions around the Earth's perimeter. They include clouds, aerosols and moisture. To my knowledge, these parameters cannot be modeled well enough to accurately predict / simulate color and brightness distribution on the fully eclipsed moon. This reasoning is behind my comment that augmenting the LRO mosaic with a full-disk color image of the moon (colors digitized with selenographic coordinates) may yield an accurate reproduction.

With that said, the LRO WAC can capture one good color 60-km swath across the eclipsed surface during it's 2-hr orbit. Maybe that data could "nudge" a predicted color/brightness distribution closer to reality, but I doubt it would be that good.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by geckzilla » Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:38 pm

alter-ego wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:06 pm
geckzilla wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am ...
Anyway, it's totally possible to put the eclipse into the simulation. One need only include a properly placed Earth...
Yes, but it would be a simulation needing additional image data to be accurate. I can see a telescopic image from Earth taken at an animated image frame time, and then overlaid on the modeled 2D mosaic. LRO imagery alone won't provide enough information to accurately render an eclipse.
I disagree. Accurate coordinates for each object (Sun, Earth, Moon) and a physics-based renderer would not be any less "accurate" than what is already rendered.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by alter-ego » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:06 pm

geckzilla wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am ...
Anyway, it's totally possible to put the eclipse into the simulation. One need only include a properly placed Earth...
Yes, but it would be a simulation needing additional image data to be accurate. I can see a telescopic image from Earth taken at an animated image frame time, and then overlaid on the modeled 2D mosaic. LRO imagery alone won't provide enough information to accurately render an eclipse.

WAC job

by neufer » Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:25 am

geckzilla wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am
alter-ego wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:10 am
You can see that over a full hemisphere, it's not possible for the LRO to capture a lunar eclipse. Given the mosaics are likely many years old, you could say the images are "faults". A lot of calculations and morphing went into those images, but rest assured, though, the representations are very accurate. However,it would have been better to add a sentence in the description stating the images are not snapshots but instead are mosaics built from LRO WAC images taken over the years.
I would go a step further and say that this is not only comprised of many thousands of images to create a mosaic, but that mosaic is applied as a fully 3D model combined with elevation data to render it as realistically as possible. Fun fact: it's hard to create the flat color mosaic at the poles because the Sun never illuminates the terrain from directly above, so shadows are always present

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by geckzilla » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am

alter-ego wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:10 am
Pat42 wrote: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:12 pm ...
Btw, there is a fault on the video on July 27th, around 20 UTC. The lunar eclipse is missing !
At first glance that seems to be true. It is not evident from the description that LRO did not take those pictures as real-time snapshots. In fact, it's likely there is no image in that video that was acquired in 2018. Probably all the lunation animations (2011 to present) were derived from the Wide Angle Camera (WAC) near-side mosaic made in 2011 from data (including South-up versions :)) The WAC acquires a 60km-wide swath of images (at 50km altitude that's about a 114° field of view!). At that resolution about 600,000 images are required to cover a single hemisphere!

You can see that over a full hemisphere, it's not possible for the LRO to capture a lunar eclipse. Given the mosaics are likely many years old, you could say the images are "faults". A lot of calculations and morphing went into those images, but rest assured, though, the representations are very accurate. However,it would have been better to add a sentence in the description stating the images are not snapshots but instead are mosaics built from LRO WAC images taken over the years.
I would go a step further and say that this is not only comprised of many thousands of images to create a mosaic, but that mosaic is applied as a fully 3D model combined with elevation data to render it as realistically as possible. Fun fact: it's hard to create the flat color mosaic at the poles because the Sun never illuminates the terrain from directly above, so shadows are always present.

Anyway, it's totally possible to put the eclipse into the simulation. One need only include a properly placed Earth...

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by alter-ego » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:10 am

Pat42 wrote: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:12 pm ...
Btw, there is a fault on the video on July 27th, around 20 UTC. The lunar eclipse is missing !
At first glance that seems to be true. It is not evident from the description that LRO did not take those pictures as real-time snapshots. In fact, it's likely there is no image in that video that was acquired in 2018. Probably all the lunation animations (2011 to present) were derived from the Wide Angle Camera (WAC) near-side mosaic made in 2011 from data (including South-up versions :)) The WAC acquires a 60km-wide swath of images (at 50km altitude that's about a 114° field of view!). At that resolution about 600,000 images are required to cover a single hemisphere!

You can see that over a full hemisphere, it's not possible for the LRO to capture a lunar eclipse. Given the mosaics are likely many years old, you could say the images are "faults". A lot of calculations and morphing went into those images, but rest assured, though, the representations are very accurate. However,it would have been better to add a sentence in the description stating the images are not snapshots but instead are mosaics built from LRO WAC images taken over the years.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Pat42 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:12 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:51 pm I note that the frame rate of this video is one frame per real time hour. Is it possible to slow down the display rate of YouTube videos? The names of features on the moon and the stats flash by too fast to read.

Bruce
From the cog wheel (settings) you can select diferent sepeeds, from x0.25 (slower) to x2 (faster).
However this does not work reliably. Whenever you pause and restart the video is back on standard speed, even though it shows a different speed !

Btw, there is a fault on the video on July 27th, around 20 UTC. The lunar eclipse is missing !

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by MoonSmith » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:02 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:51 pm I note that the frame rate of this video is one frame per real time hour. Is it possible to slow down the display rate of YouTube videos? The names of features on the moon and the stats flash by too fast to read.

Bruce

If you open the video on YouTube, in the lower right corner there is a gear wheel, select that and you can reduce or speed up the video.+

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by RJN » Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:27 pm

first98@sonic.net wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:20 pm No credit to the performers of the Strauss waltz? Shame! :evil: :evil:
Good point. It was provided for free by YouTube without obvious attribution. Here is a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ntn86KbtG4 . If anyone can track down the performers please post it here.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by neufer » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:44 pm

first98@sonic.net wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:20 pm
No credit to the performers of the Strauss waltz? Shame! :evil: :evil:
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/B6TYDJ/spike- ... B6TYDJ.jpg

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by edgardine » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:33 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:48 pm
edgardine wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:12 pm Earthshine is missing, isn't it ?
Our displays are incapable of simultaneously displaying Earthshine and the illuminated part of the Moon. There's far too much dynamic range. It is possible, of course, to distort the brightness curve in such a way that both are shown, but presumably they chose to simply use a linear scaling, meaning no visible Earthshine (even if their model includes this source of illumination).
Thank you for this answer.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by first98@sonic.net » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:20 pm

No credit to the performers of the Strauss waltz? Shame! :evil: :evil:

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by SeedsofEarth » Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:32 pm

Love the allusion to 2001, Space Odyssey. Always loved what Stanley Kubrick did to that movie with the music. Perfect!

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 pm

BDanielMayfield wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:51 pm I note that the frame rate of this video is one frame per real time hour. Is it possible to slow down the display rate of YouTube videos? The names of features on the moon and the stats flash by too fast to read.
I don't know of a way to do it from inside YouTube. But you can easily download the video, and play it with any of a number of players which support slow motion playback.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by BDanielMayfield » Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:51 pm

I note that the frame rate of this video is one frame per real time hour. Is it possible to slow down the display rate of YouTube videos? The names of features on the moon and the stats flash by too fast to read.

Bruce

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:48 pm

edgardine wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:12 pm Earthshine is missing, isn't it ?
Our displays are incapable of simultaneously displaying Earthshine and the illuminated part of the Moon. There's far too much dynamic range. It is possible, of course, to distort the brightness curve in such a way that both are shown, but presumably they chose to simply use a linear scaling, meaning no visible Earthshine (even if their model includes this source of illumination).

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by BDanielMayfield » Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:27 pm

Awesome APOD!

And it even shows Earth's Artic ocean as it soon will be, free of almost all ice. :cry:

Bruce

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by edgardine » Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:12 pm

Earthshine is missing, isn't it ?

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by dduggan47 » Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:58 pm

ihowarth wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:50 am Absolutely brilliant animation -- so much information packed into such an elegant presentation.

Not really "N-hemi-centric", beyond the universal convention that N is "up", but a version without the (distracting, barely legible) labels would be nice.
Absolutely agree that it's brilliant and that it could do without the labels.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by starsurfer » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:58 am

I think it's time to go on a moon safari! :D :lol2:

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Case » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:30 am

APOD wrote: What is less apparent night-to-night is that the Moon's apparent size changes slightly, and that a slight wobble called a libration occurs as the Moon progresses along its elliptical orbit.
The Wiki describes nicely why the wobble is a perceived oscillation from our vantage point. I do wonder how it changes over extreme long time, as some of the components (eccentricity of the orbit, axis of rotation) could have been different in the far past.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Half-empty » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:13 am

As the Moon orbits the Earth, the half illuminated by the Sun first becomes increasingly visible, then decreasingly visible.
The visibility of the sunlit side greatly depends on when you start watching it. If you start watching when the moon is full, it first becomes decreasingly visible, then increasingly visible.

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by Kelleher » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:52 am

Beautiful

Re: APOD: Lunations (2018 Sep 12)

by DomeLord » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:31 am

Magnificent work! Well done!

Top