Starship Asterisk*

[quote="C A Bruce" post_id=284411 time=1532542778]
What am I missing??
If this is the Oregon coast, and I see water, then I'm looking west. Correct???
I see Venus, and I see a full moon... How can I see a FM right after sunset...
[/quote]
It's not full. It's a waxing crescent, just before first quarter. The full moon occurs on July 27th.

What am I missing??
If this is the Oregon coast, and I see water, then I'm looking west. Correct???
I see Venus, and I see a full moon... How can I see a FM right after sunset...
Was a special lens, filter, or some other magical photog device used???
Inquiring minds find this odd...
I have been watching APOD for many years and find it fascinating and quite
educational.
Thank you, Robert N. and all who help make this site available to us..

Best wishes C A Bruce (WP2N)

[quote=neufer post_id=284175 time=1531840978 user_id=124483]
[quote="Chris Peterson" post_id=284172 time=1531832968 user_id=117706]
[quote=alter-ego post_id=284161 time=1531806319 user_id=125299]

That's not right. The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°. Less than 1° is evident just looking at the image.
So, as seen from the West Coast, which this image is, the minimum separation approaches 1/2°. On the East Coast, the minimum visible separation is 2°. Location, location, location.
[/quote]

Maybe some confusion with the previous night's conjunction, when the Moon and [i]Mercury [/i]were just two degrees apart?[/quote]
[list]More likely: a computer program was used that [b][u]doesn't[/u][/b] take into account the fact
that the position of the Moon varies by ±1º depending upon one's position on Earth.
[/quote]
Based on the 2018 astronomical calendar link, what explains this disconnect the best (and without an erroneous computer program) is that geocentric coordinates are used. Though not as practical for lunar positions because of the relatively large parallax earthlings can easily see, geocentric coordinates do provide an accurate, valid description.

[quote=RJN post_id=284177 time=1531841796 user_id=5]
[quote=alter-ego post_id=284161 time=1531806319 user_id=125299]

The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°. [/quote]

This oversight has now been fixed on the main NASA APOD. Thanks!- RJN[/quote]
[list]He "realized there was some need for clarification" about his remarks
when he had said the words '[i][color=#FF0000]two degrees[/color][/i]' instead of '[i][color=#0000FF]one degree[/color][/i]'
but at least we can all be thankful that "[b][color=#0000FF]THERE WAS NO COLLISION[/color][/b] :!: "[/list]

Whew!

[quote=alter-ego post_id=284161 time=1531806319 user_id=125299]
The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°.
[/quote]

This oversight has now been fixed on the main NASA APOD. Thanks!
- RJN

[quote="Chris Peterson" post_id=284172 time=1531832968 user_id=117706]
[quote=alter-ego post_id=284161 time=1531806319 user_id=125299]
[quote="APOD Robot" post_id=284158 time=1531800662 user_id=128559]
... within just two degrees at its closest. [/quote]
That's not right. The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°. Less than 1° is evident just looking at the image.
So, as seen from the West Coast, which this image is, the minimum separation approaches 1/2°. On the East Coast, the minimum visible separation is 2°. Location, location, location.
[/quote]

Maybe some confusion with the previous night's conjunction, when the Moon and [i]Mercury [/i]were just two degrees apart?[/quote]
[list]More likely: a computer program was used that [b][u]doesn't[/u][/b] take into account the fact
that the position of the Moon varies by ±1º depending upon one's position on Earth.

[b][i][color=#0000FF]Who are you going to believe: a computer program or your own eyes[/color][/i][/b] :?: [/list]

[quote=alter-ego post_id=284161 time=1531806319 user_id=125299]
[quote="APOD Robot" post_id=284158 time=1531800662 user_id=128559]
... within just two degrees at its closest. [/quote]
That's not right. The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°. Less than 1° is evident just looking at the image.
So, as seen from the West Coast, which this image is, the minimum separation approaches 1/2°. On the East Coast, the minimum visible separation is 2°. Location, location, location.
[/quote]

Maybe some confusion with the previous night's conjunction, when the Moon and [i]Mercury [/i]were just two degrees apart?
_
[attachment=0]E7_41667p.jpg[/attachment]

Here in beautiful Oregon...

:---[===] *

[quote="APOD Robot" post_id=284158 time=1531800662 user_id=128559]
... within just two degrees at its closest. [/quote]
That's not right. The moon (center) / Venus separation was just within 0.7°. Less than 1° is evident just looking at the image.
So, as seen from the West Coast, which this image is, the minimum separation approaches 1/2°. On the East Coast, the minimum visible separation is 2°. Location, location, location.

[url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180717.html] [img]https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/calendar/S_180717.jpg[/img] [size=150]Moon and Venus over Cannon Beach[/size][/url]

[b] Explanation: [/b] What's that spot next to the Moon? [url=https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/venus/overview/]Venus[/url]. Two days ago, the crescent Moon slowly drifted past Venus, appearing [url=http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/astrocal/astrocal2018est.html]within just two degrees[/url] at its closest. This [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_(astronomy)]conjunction[/url], though, was just one of several photographic adventures for our Moon this month ([url=https://www.quora.com/Does-the-origin-of-the-word-month-have-anything-to-do-with-the-word-moon]moon-th[/url]), because, for one, a partial solar eclipse occurred [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180714.html]just a few days before[/url], on July 12. Currently, the Moon appears to be brightening, as seen from the Earth, as the fraction of its face illuminated by the Sun continues to increase. In a few days, [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180328.html]the Moon[/url] will appear more than half full, and therefore be in its [url=https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/54/phases-of-the-moon/]gibbous phase[/url]. Next week the face of [url=https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/earths-moon/overview/]the Moon[/url] that always faces [url=https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/earth/overview/]the Earth[/url] will become, as viewed from the Earth, completely illuminated by [url=https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/solar-system/sun/in-depth/]the Sun[/url]. Even this full phase will bring an adventure, though, as a total eclipse of this [url=https://www.farmersalmanac.com/full-moon-names]Thunder Moon[/url] will occur on July 27. Don't worry about [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_(goddess)]our Luna[/url] getting tired, though, because she'll be new again next month (moon-th) -- August 11 to be exact -- just as she causes another partial eclipse of the Sun. Pictured, [url=http://earthsky.org/todays-image/photos-venus-mercury-moon-july-2018]Venus and the Moon were captured[/url] from [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nSUVa_fPC0]Cannon Beach[/url] above a rock formation off the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon]Oregon[/url] ([url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States]USA[/url]) coast known as [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haystack_Rock#/media/File:The_needles_at_Cannon_beach.jpg]the Needles[/url]. About an hour after this image was taken, the spin of the Earth caused both [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap100516.html]Venus and the Moon[/url] to [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180604.html]set[/url].


[table][tr][td=left][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=180716][b]<< Previous APOD[/b][/url][/td] [td=center][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/view_retro.php?date=0717][b]This Day in APOD[/b][/url][/td] [td=right][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=180718][b]Next APOD >>[/b][/url][/td][/tr][/table]