by Ann » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:07 pm
bystander wrote:A Double Discovery
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 2017 Aug 21
NGC 178 may be small, but it packs quite a punch. Measuring around 40 000 light-years across, its diameter is less than half that of the
Milky Way, and it is accordingly classified as a
dwarf galaxy. Despite its diminutive size, NGC 178 is busy forming new stars. On average, the galaxy forms stars totalling around half the mass of the Sun per year — enough to label it a
starburst galaxy.
The galaxy’s discovery is an interesting, and somewhat confusing, story. It was originally discovered by American astronomer
Ormond Stone in 1885 and dubbed NGC 178, but its position in the sky was recorded incorrectly — by accident the value for the galaxy’s
right ascension (which can be thought of as the celestial equivalent of terrestrial
longitude) was off by a considerable amount.
In the years that followed NGC 178 was spotted again, this time by French astronomer
Stéphane Javelle. As no catalogued object occupied that position in the sky, Javelle believed he had discovered a new galaxy and entered it into the expanded
Index Catalogue under the name
IC 39. Later, American astronomer
Herbert Howe also observed the object and corrected Stone’s initial mistake. Many years later, astronomers finally noticed that NGC 178 and IC 39 were
actually the same object!
This image of NGC 178 comprises data gathered by the
Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 aboard the
NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope.
I'm a bit surprised at this. For one thing, the picture of NGC 178 doesn't suggest that the galaxy is forming huge numbers of stars, as the overall color of it is rather more orange than blue. But that may be due to the fact that the only filters used for this image are an ultraviolet one at 300 nm and an infrared one at 814 nm.
This, too, seemed very surprising to me:
Space Telescope wrote:
NGC 178 may be small, but it packs quite a punch. Measuring around 40 000 light-years across, its diameter is less than half that of the Milky Way, and it is accordingly classified as a dwarf galaxy. Despite its diminutive size, NGC 178 is busy forming new stars.
On average, the galaxy forms stars totalling around half the mass of the Sun per year —
enough to label it a starburst galaxy.
Really? The formation of new stars at a rate of half a solar mass a year is a lot?
This paper from 2015 claims that the Milky Way churns out ~1.65 solar masses of new stars per year, and the Milky Way is so far from being a starburst galaxy!
Then again, the Milky Way is a pretty big and massive galaxy, and because the sheer size and mass of it, it contains many starforming molecular clouds. Small galaxies simply don't have so much raw material to work with. IC 10, a dwarf galaxy that is really classified as a starburst galaxy, only produces 0.04–0.08 solar masses per year,
according to Wikipedia!
Ann
[quote="bystander"][url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1734a/][size=125][b][i]A Double Discovery[/i][/b][/size][/url]
ESA Hubble Picture of the Week | 2017 Aug 21
[quote]
[float=left][size=85][img3="[b][i]Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA[/i][/b]"]https://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archives/images/screen/potw1734a.jpg[/img3][hr][/hr][/size][/float][url=http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+178]NGC 178[/url] may be small, but it packs quite a punch. Measuring around 40 000 light-years across, its diameter is less than half that of the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way]Milky Way[/url], and it is accordingly classified as a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_galaxy]dwarf galaxy[/url]. Despite its diminutive size, NGC 178 is busy forming new stars. On average, the galaxy forms stars totalling around half the mass of the Sun per year — enough to label it a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starburst_galaxy]starburst galaxy[/url].
The galaxy’s discovery is an interesting, and somewhat confusing, story. It was originally discovered by American astronomer [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ormond_Stone]Ormond Stone[/url] in 1885 and dubbed NGC 178, but its position in the sky was recorded incorrectly — by accident the value for the galaxy’s [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_ascension]right ascension[/url] (which can be thought of as the celestial equivalent of terrestrial [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitude]longitude[/url]) was off by a considerable amount.
In the years that followed NGC 178 was spotted again, this time by French astronomer [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C3%A9phane_Javelle]Stéphane Javelle[/url]. As no catalogued object occupied that position in the sky, Javelle believed he had discovered a new galaxy and entered it into the expanded [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_General_Catalogue#Index_Catalogue]Index Catalogue[/url] under the name [url=http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=IC+39]IC 39[/url]. Later, American astronomer [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Alonzo_Howe]Herbert Howe[/url] also observed the object and corrected Stone’s initial mistake. Many years later, astronomers finally noticed that NGC 178 and IC 39 were [url=http://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc1a.htm#178]actually the same object[/url]!
This image of NGC 178 comprises data gathered by the [url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/about/general/instruments/wfpc2/]Wide Field Planetary Camera 2[/url] aboard the [url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/about/general/fact_sheet/]NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope[/url]. [/quote][/quote]
I'm a bit surprised at this. For one thing, the picture of NGC 178 doesn't suggest that the galaxy is forming huge numbers of stars, as the overall color of it is rather more orange than blue. But that may be due to the fact that the only filters used for this image are an ultraviolet one at 300 nm and an infrared one at 814 nm.
This, too, seemed very surprising to me:
[quote][url=https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1734a/]Space Telescope[/url] wrote:
NGC 178 may be small, but it packs quite a punch. Measuring around 40 000 light-years across, its diameter is less than half that of the Milky Way, and it is accordingly classified as a dwarf galaxy. Despite its diminutive size, NGC 178 is busy forming new stars. [b][size=110][color=#FF00FF]On average, the galaxy forms stars totalling around half the mass of the Sun per year[/color][/size][/b] — [b][size=110][color=#0080FF]enough to label it a starburst galaxy[/color][/size][/b].[/quote]
Really? The formation of new stars at a rate of half a solar mass a year is a lot? [url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806...96L]This paper from 2015[/url] claims that the Milky Way churns out ~1.65 solar masses of new stars per year, and the Milky Way is so far from being a starburst galaxy!
Then again, the Milky Way is a pretty big and massive galaxy, and because the sheer size and mass of it, it contains many starforming molecular clouds. Small galaxies simply don't have so much raw material to work with. IC 10, a dwarf galaxy that is really classified as a starburst galaxy, only produces 0.04–0.08 solar masses per year, [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IC_10]according to Wikipedia[/url]!
Ann