by JohnD » Tue May 30, 2017 8:42 am
Beautiful, indeed, but surely a complete construct, courtesy of PhotoShop or similar?
That sky has to have been a long exposure - those glowing clouds are invisible to the eye - so camera was mounted on a motorised stand and the foreground must be a separate image, as it is sharp. Taken in dawn light? Not flash.
Astronomical pictures by scientists, of galaxies, dust clouds etc, are often declared to be 'composites' of many individual images. Why are the excellent, skilled and artistic photographers who work from ground level so shy of making clear their methods?
John
Beautiful, indeed, but surely a complete construct, courtesy of PhotoShop or similar?
That sky has to have been a long exposure - those glowing clouds are invisible to the eye - so camera was mounted on a motorised stand and the foreground must be a separate image, as it is sharp. Taken in dawn light? Not flash.
Astronomical pictures by scientists, of galaxies, dust clouds etc, are often declared to be 'composites' of many individual images. Why are the excellent, skilled and artistic photographers who work from ground level so shy of making clear their methods?
John