Starship Asterisk*

maybe thats a benefit at longer focal lengths, but theres not much difference with an 8mm fisheye which is what this looks like

and I thought high altitudes were also associated with lack of distortion from the thicker atmosphere ?

[quote="Markus Schwarz"]Thanks Chris, I have been wondering myself. Maybe they mean [i]latitude[/i]? If you want dark skies, I guess being in the southern hemisphere at large latitude helps at this time of year.[/quote]
I think they meant altitude. High altitude locations are associated with dark clarity, it's just that the reason has much more to do with remoteness than altitude.

There are sites as dark as this all over the world, and not all are terribly remote or hard to reach.

There is also the implication that this image was shot last night but based on the location of Venus my guess is it was shot in April.

MP

[quote="Chris Peterson"]There is the implication that this image owes much to the altitude of the site. But the sky would look identical to a camera at sea level, assuming dark, dry skies. And almost identical visually, as well. The altitude has very little effect on the limiting magnitude.

What is important for submillimeter astronomy is the absence of water, and that is very low indeed, because of both the regional topography and the altitude.[/quote]
Thanks Chris, I have been wondering myself. Maybe they mean [i]latitude[/i]? If you want dark skies, I guess being in the southern hemisphere at large latitude helps at this time of year.

There is the implication that this image owes much to the altitude of the site. But the sky would look identical to a camera at sea level, assuming dark, dry skies. And almost identical visually, as well. The altitude has very little effect on the limiting magnitude.

What is important for submillimeter astronomy is the absence of water, and that is very low indeed, because of both the regional topography and the altitude.

My forward-facing primate eyes are confused by the all-skyscape. Most of the dishes are pointing at the same spot but some aren't. I can't seem to pick out exactly which ones are and which ones are not.

[url=http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140724.html][img]http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/calendar/S_140724.jpg[/img] [size=150]ALMA Milky Way[/size][/url]

[b] Explanation: [/b] This alluring all-skyscape was taken 5,100 meters above sea level, from the [url=http://www.almaobservatory.org/en/visuals/alma-virtual-tour]Chajnantor Plateau[/url] in the Chilean Andes. Viewed through the site's rarefied atmosphere at about 50% sea level pressure, the gorgeous Milky Way stretches through the scene. Its [url=http://astrobob.areavoices.com/tag/great-rift/]cosmic rifts[/url] of dust, stars, and nebulae are joined by Venus, a brilliant morning star immersed in a strong band of predawn [url=http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120223.html]Zodiacal light[/url]. Still not [url=http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110730.html]completely dark[/url] even at this high altitude, the night sky's greenish cast is due to [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airglow]airglow[/url] emission from oxygen atoms. Around the horizon the dish antenna units of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, [url=http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140526.html]ALMA, explore the universe[/url] at wavelengths over 1,000 times longer than visible light.

[b][table][tr][td=left][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=140723]<< Previous APOD[/url][/td] [td=center][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/view_retro.php?date=0724]This Day in APOD[/url][/td] [td=right][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=140725]Next APOD >>[/url][/td][/tr][/table][/b]