APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Beyond » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:56 pm

Unless Orion doesn't like it and decides that we should "join" his club. ::OUCH!!::

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Galaxian » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:31 pm

Tszabeau wrote:[
I'm not a mathematician so excuse my ignorance but, does one milliard equal one million mallards?
A milliard is one millionth of a billiard. Or a billionth of a trilliard. Looking at it from the other direction, a milliard is a thousand, thousand of thousands.
Mallards are canards which I do not tell.
I would not drake politics into it but I disagree with the pusillanimous UKlander government, I find "-ard's" to be far more convenient than not having and using them. Still, it is "-ard" to drag seven milliard others with me especially when the BBC, among many defeatists, has basically given in and insists on using "-illions" exclusively; to the great detriment of our magical and beautiful language.
We have the words, we should use them. Besides, the "-ard" counting scheme is easy to follow, it isn't... and the "-illion" scheme is less powerful.
Yes, I realise I've lost this battle but there is no glory in fighting a war against unsurmountable odds when it could be won. Lost causes are the bestest causes and I do not duck my responsibility to the Mother Tongue.
To be helpful, a million mallards would be birds of a feather flocking together. A flocking hugeness and rather a cacophony if they were startled.
Water fowl description.
I still suggest that Brigid's Ring, also yclept M57, would be a beautiful thing to orbit some probes around for the purposes of making 4D, Ultra-HD movies. (Length, breadth, width and time, 4 not "3" as is wrongly insisted upon by TV makers.) Though getting there, even in robotic proxy, would take so long that the glorious clouds we observe today from Earth would have dissipated. Still, there is always Betelgeuse. Should we send a fleet of high-tech robots to swallow around that star it is likely that there would be a lovely, glowing, growing cloud of gorgeousness by the time they fall into their orbits.
Now there's a project our children may appreciate, certainly more than building a pointy palace for the jerked remains of a boob less deserving of it than a cat. I wonder if any of the long-term Foundations would be interested?
Earth to Alpha Orionis at Voyager speeds would take about half a million years or so. Imminently doable with 21st Century technologies. Even building RTG's that would power the beasts for a mega-year or more would be feasible. And, tree-huggers and GreenPeacer's take note, all nasty, evil nook-joose sent to Orion would never be here harming the bunnies. Truly a project beneficial to *everyone*.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by ta152h0 » Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:55 pm

I got schooled here once

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by rstevenson » Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:00 pm

BillBixby wrote: As I recall the singing group America was formed in Canada. :lol2:
Nope. They were English, more or less, the progeny of American fathers and English Moms, and were raised in England -- though two of the three members were born in the US. Wikipedia says, "Eventually the trio dubbed themselves America, chosen because they did not want anyone to think they were British musicians trying to sound American."

Rob

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by BillBixby » Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:04 pm

Hi JohnD',
Pardon me for opening my thoughts regarding your question which I don't feel was answered:

JohnD wrote:
How do the different elements become so stratified in the nebula. so as to produce the gradation of colour?

I would suspect the different rings due to the different elements traveling at different speeds due to the different masses of the elements. Like masses traveling together, forming common rings.

Too bad this is yesterdays news and I doubt anybody will go backwards to see my reply, but it is my thought as to why the different rings.

BTW, perhaps the shape should be compared to a US football (not American) as I don't believe our US sport is all that popular in Mexico, Brazil and Argentina. You called it American. As I recall the singing group America was formed in Canada. :lol2:

Bill

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Fromthere » Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:26 pm

Spoonsize wrote:looks like maybe a porthole to another universe. I've a vivid imagination at times.
You are not imagining us at all. Someday maybe we will meet in person.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Jun 06, 2013 2:13 pm

JohnD wrote:It was a mistake for such an eminent and valuable site as APOD to use the 'football' comparison when the addition of the single word "American" would have made the comparison clear.
There's a big difference between something being a "mistake" and recognizing that a choice of wording might have been less than clear to some people. Alternate captions can be proposed for most APODs, which doesn't mean that those actually used represent mistakes.

The caption is short, and amplified upon by many links. In reality, any real understanding of this will come from following those links. Anybody with just enough interest to read the caption and nothing else isn't really going to have their physical understanding challenged regardless of whether they believe the interior region is spherical or ovoid. It's a trivial distinction at that level of understanding. The key point is that the interior region isn't empty.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Beyond » Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:46 pm

That ring's not hard to Bear.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by neufer » Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:30 pm

APOD Robot wrote:Image M57: The Ring Nebula

Explanation: Except for the rings of Saturn, the Ring Nebula (M57) is probably the most famous celestial band. Its classic appearance is understood to be due to our own perspective, though. The recent mapping of the expanding nebula's 3-D structure, based in part on this clear Hubble image, indicates that the nebula is a relatively dense, donut-like ring wrapped around the middle of an American football-shaped cloud of glowing gas. The view from planet Earth looks down the long axis of the football, face-on to the ring. Of course, in this well-studied example of a planetary nebula, the glowing material does not come from planets. Instead, the gaseous shroud represents outer layers expelled from the dying, once sun-like star, now a tiny pinprick of light seen at the nebula's center. Intense ultraviolet light from the hot central star ionizes atoms in the gas. In the picture, the blue color in the center is ionized helium, the cyan color of the inner ring is the glow of hydrogen and oxygen, and the reddish color of the outer ring is from nitrogen and sulfur. The Ring Nebula is about one light-year across and 2,000 light-years away. >>

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by owlice » Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:55 am

John, clearly we disagree, for I do not consider the use of "football" to be a mistake, and I am speaking not as a moderator, but as a long-time reader of APOD. My moderator status here has nothing to do with my view on the matter; I simply think you are wrong to want to impose your British sensibilities on text coming to you from a U.S. Government site.

I do agree with you that APOD is an eminent and valuable site, however.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by JohnD » Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:57 am

owlice wrote:
JohnD wrote:owlice,
if it had been described as "American-football shaped" all would be clear, and national sensibilities would be satisfied.
To call this object football shaped is just misleading, in many parts of the world that are vastly and wonderfully informed by APOD.
Whose "national sensibilities"? Yours? Seems those are the only ones you're taking into account. Bah! So long as I could insist that British government sources qualify their use of "football shaped" to indicate they mean spherical, that'd be just dandy, but I suspect you and others would think it quite cheeky of me to do so.

If your "national sensibilities" are offended by U.S. vocabulary on a site hosted by the U.S. Government, I suggest you stick to UK sources.

Please know there are plenty of people in the Americas who complain about the use of American as a designation for something pertaining to just the U.S. Of course their "national sensibilities" may not matter to you, either!
owlice,
It was a mistake for such an eminent and valuable site as APOD to use the 'football' comparison when the addition of the single word "American" would have made the comparison clear.
You are a moderator here, so have special priviledges, but those do not include taking exception to correction.
I appeal to the body of moderators, and will report myself to them for their consideration.
John

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by stephen63 » Thu Jun 06, 2013 2:19 am

owlice wrote: Please know there are plenty of people in the Americas who complain about the use of American as a designation for something pertaining to just the U.S.
Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Beyond » Thu Jun 06, 2013 2:10 am

Made green legible :?:
Who was that masked gecko :?:
thCA1G9JU6.jpg
thCA1G9JU6.jpg (5.63 KiB) Viewed 1464 times

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by bystander » Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:43 am

neufer wrote:
Looking Down a Barrel of Gas at a Doomed Star wrote:
<<The colors are approximately true colors. The color image was assembled from three black-and-white photos taken through different color filters with the Hubble telescope's Wide Field Planetary Camera 2. Blue isolates emission from very hot helium, which is located primarily close to the hot central star. Green represents ionized oxygen, which is located farther from the star. Red shows ionized nitrogen, which is radiated from the coolest gas, located farthest from the star. The gradations of color illustrate how the gas glows because it is bathed in ultraviolet radiation from the remnant central star, whose surface temperature is a white-hot 120,000 degrees Celsius.>>

While this indeed looks very similar, it is not the same image. See Hubble Heritage for the original component images and ESA/Hubble for the color assignments.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Canadian Grandma » Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:59 am

To me it looks like neither a ring nor a "football' but rather like a great blue eye looking in astonishment (or weariness) at a petty disagreement.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by ta152h0 » Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:56 am

circular roll cloud ?

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by owlice » Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:03 am

Thanks, neufer; that was fun!!

What it was was American football

by neufer » Wed Jun 05, 2013 11:27 pm

Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by owlice » Wed Jun 05, 2013 10:54 pm

JohnD wrote:owlice,
if it had been described as "American-football shaped" all would be clear, and national sensibilities would be satisfied.
To call this object football shaped is just misleading, in many parts of the world that are vastly and wonderfully informed by APOD.
Whose "national sensibilities"? Yours? Seems those are the only ones you're taking into account. Bah! So long as I could insist that British government sources qualify their use of "football shaped" to indicate they mean spherical, that'd be just dandy, but I suspect you and others would think it quite cheeky of me to do so.

If your "national sensibilities" are offended by U.S. vocabulary on a site hosted by the U.S. Government, I suggest you stick to UK sources.

Please know there are plenty of people in the Americas who complain about the use of American as a designation for something pertaining to just the U.S. Of course their "national sensibilities" may not matter to you, either!

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Jun 05, 2013 10:03 pm

JohnD wrote:Now. Can anyone answer my rider question, which I repeat?
How do the different elements become so stratified in the nebula. so as to produce the gradation of colour?
There may be a degree of actual stratification caused by physical processes, but mostly what you're seeing are different areas selectively ionized. Gases with high ionization energies are glowing near the center; those with lower energies glow further out. You're seeing an energy gradient more than a material one.

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by neufer » Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:47 pm

JohnD wrote:
How do the different elements become so stratified in the nebula. so as to produce the gradation of colour?
It is indicative of a temperature gradient:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1999/01/image/a/ wrote:
<<The colors are approximately true colors. The color image was assembled from three black-and-white photos taken through different color filters with the Hubble telescope's Wide Field Planetary Camera 2. Blue isolates emission from very hot helium, which is located primarily close to the hot central star. Green represents ionized oxygen, which is located farther from the star. Red shows ionized nitrogen, which is radiated from the coolest gas, located farthest from the star. The gradations of color illustrate how the gas glows because it is bathed in ultraviolet radiation from the remnant central star, whose surface temperature is a white-hot 120,000 degrees Celsius.>>

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by JohnD » Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:16 pm

owlice,
if it had been described as "American-football shaped" all would be clear, and national sensibilities would be satisfied.
To call this object football shaped is just misleading, in many parts of the world that are vastly and wonderfully informed by APOD.
I was neither surprised, lamenting nor complaining about the original use of "football".
I wanted to correct a misleading description, in what I hoped was a way that would not give offence, with a self-depreciating joke.

Now that IS a British speciality, self-depreciation.
It's a form of irony, that is a weapon of humour that can backfire, if not appreciated.



Now. Can anyone answer my rider question, which I repeat?
How do the different elements become so stratified in the nebula. so as to produce the gradation of colour?
JOhn

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by Boomer12k » Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:42 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
zbvhs wrote:In other words, the spheroid surface is seen tangentially and we're looking through many millions of kilometers of "stuff". It's really not a flat structure that could be described as a "ring".
That was the view for a long time. But the new evidence demonstrates that is wrong. The Ring Nebula really is a ring (more precisely, a toroid). We're not seeing it the way we do because of the tangential view through a spherical body or shell.

The spherical components, found inside and outside the torus, are only visible with very long exposures using sensitive detectors. The only thing that anybody has ever seen through a telescope, or in most images, is the toroidal structure. The ring.

When I look through my telescope....I see "God's Smoke Ring"....it looks like a ring in the blackness of space...no color, no depth...just flat circle...I don't even see a DOUGHNUT...that would be 3 dimensional...it is a 2D flat appearing...."Smoke Ring"....
If it were not for color photography, we would say..."odd, looks like a ring"....Ok...on to M58....:)

Don't get me wrong, it is one of my favorite objects!!! I think it is neat!!!!!

:---[===] *

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by bystander » Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:53 pm

Ann wrote:
stephen63 wrote: Is it not a ring?
I think it's a donut.

Ask Rob.

Ann
See the videos @ http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?t=31431

Re: APOD: M57: The Ring Nebula (2013 Jun 05)

by MargaritaMc » Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:48 pm

More on the Stirling football!
Anthony Barreiro wrote: Has any effort been made to find the descendants of the lad (assuming it wasn't a lass) who kicked it up on the roof in the 1540's?
Well, curiouser and curiouser, as Alice ungrammatically said. Wikipedia says it was found on the roof, but The Beeb says that it was
... discovered behind the paneling of the Queen's Chamber in Stirling Castle, which was decorated in the 1540's.

Mary Queen of Scots was there at this time and later in life was known to have an interest in all sports but especially golf and football. She recorded a game of football in her diaries while at Carlisle Castle. :shock:

The ball could have been used in the courtyards within the castle or taken to the royal gardens below the walls. Everyone from the castle, including kings and queens would have been involved. Football was a game for all just as it is today.

Was this personal item, belonging to Mary, deliberately placed behind the paneling to act as a protection from witchcraft, a practice common at the time or was it somehow lost. We will never answer that question but we do know that this little ball is the beginning of a sport that now involves a sixth of the population of the world.
So, it could have been kicked by The Lassie hersel' :mrgreen: .

Margarita

Top