by Chris Peterson » Sat Mar 23, 2013 1:20 am
will hunt wrote:One of the most interesting assertions I have ever seen, vis-a-vis humanity's interaction with the cosmos, was today's "... the expanding debris cloud of a star that was seen to explode about 11,000 years ago." (emphasis added)
I don't doubt it could have and may have been seen, but what historical evidence do we have that the explosion was observed by human beings? Surely that proof is one of archeology's triumphant moments.
I want to believe it. Help, please.
The proper way to interpret "was seen to explode about 11,000 years ago" is "the light from the supernova reached Earth 11,000 years ago", or "we are looking at this event 11,000 years after the supernova". This is to avoid the ongoing confusion in APOD captions about when something "really" happened, where people try to compensate for the distance... which does not, in fact, typically matter.
The expression should not be literally taken to imply "seen by humans", although it is quite certain that, at only 800 ly distance, this event must have been witnessed by people.
[quote="will hunt"]One of the most interesting assertions I have ever seen, vis-a-vis humanity's interaction with the cosmos, was today's "... the expanding debris cloud of a star [i][b]that was seen to explode[/b][/i] about 11,000 years ago." (emphasis added)
I don't doubt it could have and may have been seen, but what historical evidence do we have that the explosion was observed by human beings? Surely that proof is one of archeology's triumphant moments.
I want to believe it. Help, please.[/quote]
The proper way to interpret "was seen to explode about 11,000 years ago" is "the light from the supernova reached Earth 11,000 years ago", or "we are looking at this event 11,000 years after the supernova". This is to avoid the ongoing confusion in APOD captions about when something "really" happened, where people try to compensate for the distance... which does not, in fact, typically matter.
The expression should not be literally taken to imply "seen by humans", although it is quite certain that, at only 800 ly distance, this event must have been witnessed by people.