Beginner Astrophotographer

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Beginner Astrophotographer

Re: Beginner Astrophotographer

by yash_1705 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:25 pm

Thanks a lot Chris ! :)

Re: Beginner Astrophotographer

by Chris Peterson » Tue Dec 25, 2012 5:31 pm

BMAONE23 wrote:I might suggest taking a series of images that are no longer than say 1/10th second and using a stacker program to combine the images into one for depth. If you image from a Fixed Tripod, a 30S(econd) exposure will give you depth but it will also show trailing since the stars will move over the time the iris is open. Even 30-1Second exposures stacked will give the same depth as a single 30second exposure. Though having the iris open for 1 full second will still slightly elongate the stars. The other solution is to get a motorized tripod that will automatically track the stellar motion so No trails will occur.
Unfortunately, a stack of 30 1-second exposures will give nowhere near the depth of a single 30-second exposure. Even stacking 30-second exposures will produce largely unsatisfactory results for all but the very brightest deep sky objects.

The quality of an image is determined by the signal to noise ratio, and while stacking images does linearly increase the signal, short exposures are dominated by readout noise, which sums up with each new subexposure stacked. It's the primary source of noise in stacked, short exposure images, and there's no way to eliminate it. That's why nearly all high quality astroimages utilized the longest practical subexposures- 10-20 minutes per image is common (although the high dark current noise of DSLRs usually limits the maximum exposure to about 5 minutes).

It's possible to take simple wide angle sky images (often incorporating landscape as well) with short enough exposures that trailing is minimal. But anything else requires some sort of tracking mount.

Re: Beginner Astrophotographer

by yash_1705 » Tue Dec 25, 2012 4:22 pm

Any Other tips ?! Please Do share with me guys :( .
I really need help :s.

Re: Beginner Astrophotographer

by BMAONE23 » Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:15 pm

I might suggest taking a series of images that are no longer than say 1/10th second and using a stacker program to combine the images into one for depth. If you image from a Fixed Tripod, a 30S(econd) exposure will give you depth but it will also show trailing since the stars will move over the time the iris is open. Even 30-1Second exposures stacked will give the same depth as a single 30second exposure. Though having the iris open for 1 full second will still slightly elongate the stars. The other solution is to get a motorized tripod that will automatically track the stellar motion so No trails will occur.

Beginner Astrophotographer

by yash_1705 » Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:46 pm

I have a Nikon D90 . and i fixed a lens of tamron 75-300 mm .
and i tried to take out some shots of stars . of course i make uses of a tripod. well i put the shutter-time on 30s . i don't know why i keep on getting stars trails :?.

can someone help me for the setting please ? :(

Top