APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by neufer » Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:23 am

Luiz wrote:
A portion of Typhoon Varnei http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_Storm_Vamei has indeed crossed equator.
The eye of Typhoon VaMei remained in the Northern Hemisphere:
Image
Luiz wrote:
There were another South Atlantic hurricane besides 2003 Catarina, check November 19th 1980 in the same region.
Catarina is the only South Atlantic cyclone known to have reached hurricane strength.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_tropical_cyclone wrote:
<<South Atlantic tropical cyclones are unusual weather events that occur in the southern hemisphere. Strong wind shear (which disrupts cyclone formation) and a lack of weather disturbances favorable for tropical cyclone development make any hurricane-strength cyclones extremely rare. If a "hurricane season" were to be demarcated in the South Atlantic, it would most likely be the opposite of the North Atlantic season, from November to the end of April with mid-March being the peak when the oceans are warmest in the Southern Hemisphere. These tropical cyclones would be given identifiers starting with SL in the future.

According to a study published in 2008, there were 92 subtropical cyclones in the Southern Atlantic between 1957 and 2008.>>

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Luiz » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:28 am

A portion of Typhoon Varnei http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_Storm_Vamei has indeed crossed equator.
There were another South Atlantic hurricane besides 2003 Catarina, check November 19th 1980 in the same region.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Wiredog » Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:28 am

do_japan wrote:Why is there no record of Hurricanes/Typhoons in the southern hemisphere before 1950?
A combination of factors led to having little or no records pre-1950. The most obvious is the lack of satellite observation. Additionally, there has never been much shipping passed the Eastern South American coast during the southern summer. Even before the Panama Canal opened, most commercial shipping passed around Southern Africa or passed through in Spring and Fall. There also has been much less naval warfare in the region, so a lack of recorded observation.
There has been some unconfirmed stories of minor type tropical activity from shipping since 1500, but most was discounted as impossible and most lost to history, until Catarina proved the possibility in 2004.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by neufer » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:14 pm

Henk wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by the remark in the original text that 'evaporation of warm water gives hurricanes their energy'.

Evaporation costs energy, it's the condensation afterwards that can give off the energy again...
The subject is "water" NOT "evaporation" :

"Evaporating warm water gives [hurricanes] energy" by depositing that energy during condensation.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Henk » Thu Sep 06, 2012 8:36 am

I'm a bit surprised by the remark in the original text that 'evaporation of warm water gives hurricanes their energy'.
Evaporation costs energy, it's the condensation afterwards that can give off the energy again...

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Stephen Rasey » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:59 pm

My mistake. I should have stuck with the term "Polar Hurricane" for a strong polar low. And it is in keeping with the theme of the map.
Polar lows have been referred to by many other terms, such as polar mesoscale vortex, Arctic hurricane, Arctic low, and cold air depression. Today the term is usually reserved for the more vigorous systems that have near-surface winds of at least 17 m/s.[30]-- Wikipedia-Polar Low
Even though cyclone is a synonym for both hurricane and typhoon, but not for vortex. --thesaurus.com. Go figure.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by bystander » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:26 pm

Stephen Rasey wrote:Polar Vortex and Polar Cyclones are different things.

A polar vortex that you describe has it's eye on or near the pole.

A polar cyclone, or a polar low, such as the Nov. 2011 storm described in the Bering Sea is warm center convection cyclonic storm, albeit with a very cold upper atmosphere over a cool sea. It is a traveling low pressure storm system. http://nsidc.org/arcticmet/patterns/polar_low.html
Polar cyclone is synonymous with polar vortex, not to be confused with a polar low.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Stephen Rasey » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:10 pm

Polar Vortex and Polar Cyclones are different things.

A polar vortex that you describe has it's eye on or near the pole.

A polar cyclone, or a polar low, such as the Nov. 2011 storm described in the Bering Sea is warm center convection cyclonic storm, albeit with a very cold upper atmosphere over a cool sea. It is a traveling low pressure storm system. http://nsidc.org/arcticmet/patterns/polar_low.html

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by neufer » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:20 pm

Stephen Rasey wrote:
“The most powerful storm to affect the Bering Sea coast of Alaska in 37 years is pounding Alaska’s west coast and Eastern Siberia with hurricane-force winds, a destructive storm surge up to 7 feet high, waves up to 35 feet high, and blinding snow,” ...." central pressure of 945 mb." ... "6 foot storm surge in Nome Alaska." -- November 8-9, 2011.
That sounds like a "hurricane" to me. A polar cyclone, but a hurricane by another name.

Should storms like these be on the map?
  • No!
Tropical cyclones are (condensation warmed) warm core circulations whose strongest winds are in the near surface boundary layer.

Polar cyclones are (radiation cooled) cold core circulations whose strongest winds are in the middle (or upper) atmosphere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_cyclone wrote: <<A polar vortex (also known as Polar cyclones, polar vortices, Arctic cyclones, sub-polar cyclones, and the circumpolar whirl) is a persistent, large-scale cyclone located near one or both of a planet's geographical poles. On Earth, the polar vortices are located in the middle and upper troposphere and the stratosphere. They surround the polar highs and lie in the wake of the polar front. These cold-core low-pressure areas strengthen in the winter and weaken in the summer. They usually span 1,000–2,000 kilometers in which the air is circulating in a counter-clockwise fashion (in the northern hemisphere). The reason for the rotation is the same as any other cyclone, the Coriolis effect.

Other astronomical bodies are also known to have polar vortices, including Venus (double vortex - that is, two polar vortices at a pole ), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and Saturn's moon Titan.>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclone wrote: <<A tropical cyclone is a storm system characterized by a low-pressure center and numerous thunderstorms that produce strong winds and heavy rain. They usually span 300–700 kilometers. Tropical cyclones strengthen when water evaporated from the ocean is released as the saturated air rises, resulting in condensation of water vapor contained in the moist air. They are fueled by a different heat mechanism than other cyclonic windstorms such as nor'easters, European windstorms, and polar lows. The characteristic that separates tropical cyclones from other cyclonic systems is that at any height in the atmosphere, the center of a tropical cyclone will be warmer than its surroundings; a phenomenon called "warm core" storm systems. A tropical cyclone's primary energy source is the release of the heat of condensation from water vapor condensing, with solar heating being the initial source for evaporation. Therefore, a tropical cyclone can be visualized as a giant vertical heat engine supported by mechanics driven by physical forces such as the rotation and gravity of the Earth. In another way, tropical cyclones could be viewed as a special type of mesoscale convective complex, which continues to develop over a vast source of relative warmth and moisture. While an initial warm core system, such as an organized thunderstorm complex, is necessary for the formation of a tropical cyclone, a large flux of energy is needed to lower atmospheric pressure more than a few millibars (0.10 inch of mercury). The inflow of warmth and moisture from the underlying ocean surface is critical for tropical cyclone strengthening. A significant amount of the inflow in the cyclone is in the lowest 1 kilometre of the atmosphere.>>

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Piney Boy » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:19 pm

All I know is that as much as I love Florida and especially the Keys, NO WAY would I ever live there again. Visits are great but you have to be totally portable if if you intend to stay for any serious length of time.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Stephen Rasey » Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:05 pm

Something else missing from this map are the polar cyclones.

You can reply, "Yes, but this is a hurricane map and hurricanes are tropical." True, but if the point of the map, as stated in the original description is: Should you be worried about hurricanes? To find out, it is useful to know where hurricanes have gone in the past. If hurricanes must be tropical, then "where they have gone" is a bit tautological.
“The most powerful storm to affect the Bering Sea coast of Alaska in 37 years is pounding Alaska’s west coast and Eastern Siberia with hurricane-force winds, a destructive storm surge up to 7 feet high, waves up to 35 feet high, and blinding snow,” ...." central pressure of 945 mb." ... "6 foot storm surge in Nome Alaska." -- November 8-9, 2011.
That sounds like a "hurricane" to me. A polar cyclone, but a hurricane by another name. Should storms like these be on the map? It depends on what you want the map to show. If is useful to know where hurricanes have gone in the past, then I wonder what that big black areas north of Antarctica, around Alaska, and between Iceland and Murmansk ought to look like with polar cyclones included.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by owlice » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:48 am

Off-topic discussion moved here.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:25 am

Stephen Rasey wrote:The subject hurricane history map in today’s APOD fails this White Lie test. It purports to show "every hurricane reported" since 1851. That begs the question, "Reported to whom?" Did the author get every hurricane reported by every ship’s captain? If so, why does the Australia region of the map look so very different from the one provided by the Australian government?
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/silo/cycl ... =all&loc=0

As grover pointed out above the US did not really collect Hurricane tracking data for the east and south hemisphere until 1978.
So it is necessary to be skeptical of this map. It represents uneven data collection probably more than tells up about the distribution of hurricanes. There are more hurricanes plotted in the north Atlantic portion of the map because the US was looking for them there longer, and intently after Galveston 1900.
No, it is not necessary to be skeptical of this map at all. It is important to understand the nature of the underlying dataset (which is explained in great detail at the NOAA site for the data maintainers). It is also necessary to know which subsets of the data were used for the plot.

The purpose of the map is not to provide quantitative analysis- that can be done using the original data, and can fully allow for the various uncertainties (which typically increase as the data gets older). The purpose of the map is to provide a qualitative feel for where hurricanes occur- how they are affected by ocean and land, by latitude, and the effect of the equator. The map succeeds very well in this goal. Qualitatively, it is unlikely the map would look any different if every plotted storm had its path known with 100% accuracy.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Stephen Rasey » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:55 am

In the classic book, “How to Lie with Maps”, it begins with the line, “Not only is it easy to lie with maps, it is essential”.

You see, any map is at best a reduced form of reality. The curve of a sphere projected onto a plane. Towns simplified to dots. Labels where none exist. A map is filled with lies. The trick in making a good map is to commit only “white lies”. White lies do not distort the basic truths and relationships that are the subject of the map. White Lies add clarity, including being clear about what we don't know: Terra Incognita.

The subject hurricane history map in today’s APOD fails this White Lie test. It purports to show "every hurricane reported" since 1851. That begs the question, "Reported to whom?" Did the author get every hurricane reported by every ship’s captain? If so, why does the Australia region of the map look so very different from the one provided by the Australian government?
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/silo/cycl ... =all&loc=0

As grover pointed out above the US did not really collect Hurricane tracking data for the east and south hemisphere until 1978.
So it is necessary to be skeptical of this map. It represents uneven data collection probably more than tells up about the distribution of hurricanes. There are more hurricanes plotted in the north Atlantic portion of the map because the US was looking for them there longer, and intently after Galveston 1900.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by GerryP » Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:10 am

tjjharris wrote:The hurricane tracks page says "every" hurricane. In the way most people look for themselves in a group portrait, I look first for the track of the hurricanes which have hit my home. I live in Hawaii, and we've had only two, and recently at that, yet I see no hurricane tracks in the pacific which come up to Hawaii. Hurricane Iniki moved almost due west, and then when due south of us, came right up to smash Lihue, Kauai, "eye on". They're still rebuilding. No track for Iniki seen however. Maybe it's just too faint to see?
I zoomed in on Hawaii on the APOD and saw a track that looked like Iniki's track as listed on Wikipedia. It was hard to tell as the image got very blurry. Life on Hawaii is often portrayed as a great big paradise. Our thoughts and prayers are with those that are rebuilding after Iniki.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Moonlady » Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:12 pm

Boomer12k wrote:Just because we don't worry about Hurricanes does not mean we have nothing to worry about in the Pacific Northwest. We don't usually worry about Tornadoes, but one tore up a nearby town a couple of years ago...the first I have ever heard of one touching down in my area, and I am 59. We don't get a Hurricane, but we get 80-120 MPH winds, and cyclonic wave action off the Pacific Ocean. The 1962 Columbus Day storm is still remembered.
We also get Ice Storms, and snow storms one a decade or so. Bad flooding and such too...we can have drought and bad fire seasons, and even small, but damaging Earthquakes, And Mt. St. Helens erupted in 1980....PLENTY TO WORRY ABOUT!!! :D But tonight is nice and pleasant and I am typing this while at the telescope. 8-)

So, regardless of your troubles, I want my APOD friends to be WELL AND HAPPY!!! Safe and Sound.

:---[===]*
Lets all move to equator! :D
Boomer your telescope is connected with your pc? What kind of telescope do you use?

:usual complain insert: Todays APOD is not about astronomic picture! :P

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by neufer » Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:39 pm

do_japan wrote:
Why is there no record of Hurricanes/Typhoons in the southern hemisphere before 1950?
The further back one goes in time the less accurate the records get(, especially out of the main shipping lanes).

A display (such as this one) of global distribution works best when limited to a modern accurate sampling.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by do_japan » Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:55 pm

Why is there no record of Hurricanes/Typhoons in the southern hemisphere before 1950?

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Fafers » Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:44 pm

rhapsody58 wrote:The map is also missing at least one other track. In 2004, hurricane Catarina hit Brazil, the first South Atlantic storm on record to be strong enough to reach hurricane level. South Atlantic tropical cyclones are rare, as atmospheric conditions are much different than those in the North.
If you look closely, you will find Catarina's path just off the brazilian southern coast.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Psnarf » Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:28 pm

The sky is falling! It's a disaster of biblical proportions. Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! [apologies to "Ghost Busters"] Go find your helmet; put your helmet on.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/ ... iller-text

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:08 pm

StarDawg wrote:Usually, APOD is all about astronomy.
As it is today. Global climate change has driven our rapid increase in knowledge about climate systems in general, and has resulted in high quality climate modeling tools which are useful not just for looking at Earth, but in looking at climate and weather systems on other planets, as well... this, just as we are seeing an explosion of observational data from other planets.

First and foremost, our understanding of what is happening on other planets starts with our understanding of things on Earth: geology, tectonics, atmospherics, oceans, climate... you name it. All of these "Earth sciences" form the basis of planetary science in general.

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by StarDawg » Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:50 pm

Usually, APOD is all about astronomy. Today, I am trying to figure out if the author of the comments on today's "photograph" is myopic, and doesn't see the global trends, :oops: or has some other hidden agenda: :shock:
APOD Robot wrote:Image Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth

... evidence is accumulating that hurricanes are, on the average, more common and more powerful in the North Atlantic Ocean over the past 20 years.
The chart in the full-sized image clearly shows that there was a more pronounced global increase in strength roughly 60 or 70 years ago, lasting about 20 years followed by a slight pause of just a couple of years, becoming more common and more powerful over the past 40 years. :o

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by neufer » Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:23 pm

biddie67 wrote:
It looks like if the land mass of the North American continent weren't there to deflect hurricanes
that the Asian coastline would get a lot more bad storms.
If the land mass of the North American continent weren't there to deflect hurricanes
the Hawaiian coastline would certainly get a lot more bad storms.

However, this APOD only displays the most recent (satellite monitored) Pacific typhoons.
(A complete display of Pacific typhoons would overwhelm the visual.)

Pacific typhoons dwarf Atlantic hurricanes in both number & intensity
(and they could really care less about the North American continent).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon#Frequency wrote: <<Nearly one-third of the world's tropical cyclones form within the western Pacific. This makes this basin the most active on Earth. Pacific typhoons have formed year round, with peak months from August to October. The peak months correspond to that of the Atlantic hurricane seasons. Along with a high storm frequency, this basin also features the most globally intense storms on record. One of the most recent busy seasons was 2004. Tropical cyclones form in any month of the year across the northwest Pacific ocean, and concentrate around June and November in the northern Indian ocean. The area just northeast of the Philippines is the most active place on Earth for tropical cyclones to exist. Across the Philippines themselves, activity reaches a minimum in February, before increasing steadily through June, and spiking from July through October, with September being the most active month for tropical cyclones across the archipelago. Activity falls off significantly in November. The most frequently impacted areas of the Philippines by tropical cyclones are northern Luzon and eastern Visayas. A ten year average of satellite determined precipitation showed that at least 30 percent of the annual rainfall in the northern Philippines could be traced to tropical cyclones, while the southern islands receive less than 10 percent of their annual rainfall from tropical cyclones.>>

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by Chris Peterson » Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:12 pm

tjjharris wrote:The hurricane tracks page says "every" hurricane. In the way most people look for themselves in a group portrait, I look first for the track of the hurricanes which have hit my home. I live in Hawaii, and we've had only two, and recently at that, yet I see no hurricane tracks in the pacific which come up to Hawaii. Hurricane Iniki moved almost due west, and then when due south of us, came right up to smash Lihue, Kauai, "eye on". They're still rebuilding. No track for Iniki seen however. Maybe it's just too faint to see?
Image
I see at least two tracks in the cluster of events around Hawaii that show the west-then-north "L" shape of Iniki's path, including one that looks exactly like this. Are you looking at the full sized image?

Re: APOD: Hurricane Paths on Planet Earth (2012 Sep 04)

by emc » Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:06 pm

Unabashed fractured fiction…
The word hurricane comes from the Carib Indians of the West Indies. They had to hurry in order to harvest their sugar cane crop before the storm season hit.

Top