neufer wrote:The point of the APOD is that this is somehow a "Blue Marble Earth."
It isn't :!:
But it is. It's a synthesized image made from a much larger database of imagery. That is the meaning of "blue marble" in today's lingo.
Google Earth requires a considerable amount processing so that it has no clouds.
No it doesn't. There are clouds in Google imagery. And all they do is filter their particular blue marble dataset so that it contains only data with cloud cover below some threshold. That isn't real time processing.
This is a quasi-synoptic fisheye view of the Earth from NPP involving minimal processing.
This one particular image was synthesized from that viewpoint. And I'd bet it required almost identical routines to those used by Google Earth. In fact, I'd think there's a good chance they used the
World Wind code, which was developed by NASA for displaying Blue Marble datasets (there are a number, encompassing different times of year and different weather).
No one (but you) cares that it didn't actually involve a fisheye lens camera.
You assume a lot about what other people care about!
If this were just a fisheye image made from yet another Earth observing satellite, it would be rather boring, I think. Ho hum... been there, done that. But satellites that are continuously adding high resolution imagery to a database which can be used to synthesize Earth views over time, space, and viewpoint... that's exciting!
[quote="neufer"]The point of the APOD is that this is somehow a "Blue Marble Earth."
[c][size=150]It isn't :!: [/size][/c][/quote]
But it is. It's a synthesized image made from a much larger database of imagery. That is the meaning of "blue marble" in today's lingo.
[quote]Google Earth requires a considerable amount processing so that it has no clouds.[/quote]
No it doesn't. There are clouds in Google imagery. And all they do is filter their particular blue marble dataset so that it contains only data with cloud cover below some threshold. That isn't real time processing.
[quote]This is a quasi-synoptic fisheye view of the Earth from NPP involving minimal processing.[/quote]
This one particular image was synthesized from that viewpoint. And I'd bet it required almost identical routines to those used by Google Earth. In fact, I'd think there's a good chance they used the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_World_Wind]World Wind[/url] code, which was developed by NASA for displaying Blue Marble datasets (there are a number, encompassing different times of year and different weather).
[quote]No one (but you) cares that it didn't actually involve a fisheye lens camera.[/quote]
You assume a lot about what other people care about!
If this were just a fisheye image made from yet another Earth observing satellite, it would be rather boring, I think. Ho hum... been there, done that. But satellites that are continuously adding high resolution imagery to a database which can be used to synthesize Earth views over time, space, and viewpoint... that's exciting!