moonstruck wrote:Wow, thanks for the prospective.
There was an essay in the Wall Street Journal or some similar publication a while back about this sort of thing - how we used to refer to
really big numbers as "astronomical."
These days the astronomical numbers are yielding in their impressiveness to economical numbers. To wit:
The inflation adjusted cost of the Apollo program was around $135 billion from I think the period 1963 to 1975.
We currently add that much to our debt - just our debt, not even our entire federal budget - every 5 weeks.
The biggest single project the US ever undertook, the Interstate Highway System, cost an inflation adjusted $425 billion for the originally planned parts. We gave almost twice that much away to companies that couldn't manage their own finances.
Both Voyager missions together had an inflation-adjusted cost around $3 billion and are nearly 34 years along. The debt grows by that much in 18 hours.
The Voyager missions gain 325 million miles from the sun each year. The debt grows 1,420,000 million dollars each year.
Matt wrote:
Do you think we'll be able to gather enough information that we're looking for in just a flyby? What then, it just keeps going like the Voyager missions?
Yes. They knew how limited the time would be for collecting information and how that would limit the data collected when the mission was first approved. There is a risk that something could go wrong, in which case they would have almost no time to respond, but that's a continuous reality for interplanetary probes. Even those that orbit only have short windows of opportunity to enter orbit, and many past missions have failed that way.
The New Horizons team is trying to reduce the risk by testing everything and rehearsing procedures as much as possible. They did a full dress rehearsal by studying Jupiter when they flew by it a couple years ago, and it went very well.
After it passes Pluto, they hope to find a Kuiper belt object or two lying close enough to its trajectory to study as a bonus mission. They're identifying candidates currently.