by Nereid » Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:42 pm
dougettinger wrote:When I read the more serious and detailed reports, much of the jargon is confusing. There may be a good textbook that could clarify some of my confusion if the jargon is really standardized.
Some of the limitations as I understand them are: the alignment of the structure w.r.t. to the earth's observation platform (does a survey exist that compares the number of spherical with cylindrical outbursts?); the amount of width of view that is being analyzed (I desired to see data from numerous radial distances and numerous angular degrees surrounding the center); the temperatures at various radial distances that produce the various ionization levels (do temperature gradient studies exist from the center to certain identified boundaries); the difficulty of measuring the shock wave velocities and time of its origin (I would like to know the velocity of the identified shock wave boundaries and when each originated.), etc.
Nereid, do you know of such specific reports that may help me with the listed limitations ? Many reports drift "all over creation" and fail to benefit me. Thanks for coming to the forefront to answer some of my curious queries.
It's not a field I am particularly familiar with, so I don't really have any specific answers for you, sorry.
My best advice would be for you to ask yourself how interested you are in this topic.
If it is a consuming passion, then you're probably best served by committing many a month of your time to coming up to speed with the relevant, textbook astrophysics (and for that you need to be quite comfortable with a fair bit of algebra and calculus, as well as physics). Otherwise, why not take the time to work out a series of clear, pertinent questions? If you don't get answers here, then why not try PhysicsForums?
[quote="dougettinger"]When I read the more serious and detailed reports, much of the jargon is confusing. There may be a good textbook that could clarify some of my confusion if the jargon is really standardized.
Some of the limitations as I understand them are: the alignment of the structure w.r.t. to the earth's observation platform (does a survey exist that compares the number of spherical with cylindrical outbursts?); the amount of width of view that is being analyzed (I desired to see data from numerous radial distances and numerous angular degrees surrounding the center); the temperatures at various radial distances that produce the various ionization levels (do temperature gradient studies exist from the center to certain identified boundaries); the difficulty of measuring the shock wave velocities and time of its origin (I would like to know the velocity of the identified shock wave boundaries and when each originated.), etc.
Nereid, do you know of such specific reports that may help me with the listed limitations ? Many reports drift "all over creation" and fail to benefit me. Thanks for coming to the forefront to answer some of my curious queries.[/quote]
It's not a field I am particularly familiar with, so I don't really have any specific answers for you, sorry.
My best advice would be for you to ask yourself how interested you are in this topic.
If it is a consuming passion, then you're probably best served by committing many a month of your time to coming up to speed with the relevant, textbook astrophysics (and for that you need to be quite comfortable with a fair bit of algebra and calculus, as well as physics). Otherwise, why not take the time to work out a series of clear, pertinent questions? If you don't get answers here, then why not try PhysicsForums?