by StarCuriousAero » Thu May 05, 2011 8:52 pm
Sorry Chris, someone else was the rude person, it wasn't you looking back, what you said wasn't rude at all, and yes you did offer scientific reason.
I don't personally know much at all about volcanism, I just think "B"s reasoning that different density gases/liquids(?) flowing next to each other might produce some sort of weather process similar to volcanic venting capable of causing the ongoing storm is still possible and not worth dismissal, just because we haven't seen anything like it on Earth. B seemed to offer credible mechanisms for what he was suggesting, and seemed to be supported by biddie67, but it wasn't you who "dismissed" them really. I was just trying to offer support since what they suggest does seem possible/logical to me, but I'm no physicist or climatologist.
I do always find it immensely irritating in general though when someone offers an idea never-before-thought-of to explain something, and then gets shut down by others, because there have been too many examples in the past where they turned out to be right. We still have a lot to learn about our universe. Sorry for my misdirected wrath, it wasn't meant for you Chris, I just need to learn not to be so hasty in my replies I suppose and keep it anonymous just in case I read something wrong again. :-/
Sorry Chris, someone else was the rude person, it wasn't you looking back, what you said wasn't rude at all, and yes you did offer scientific reason.
I don't personally know much at all about volcanism, I just think "B"s reasoning that different density gases/liquids(?) flowing next to each other might produce some sort of weather process similar to volcanic venting capable of causing the ongoing storm is still possible and not worth dismissal, just because we haven't seen anything like it on Earth. B seemed to offer credible mechanisms for what he was suggesting, and seemed to be supported by biddie67, but it wasn't you who "dismissed" them really. I was just trying to offer support since what they suggest does seem possible/logical to me, but I'm no physicist or climatologist.
I do always find it immensely irritating in general though when someone offers an idea never-before-thought-of to explain something, and then gets shut down by others, because there have been too many examples in the past where they turned out to be right. We still have a lot to learn about our universe. Sorry for my misdirected wrath, it wasn't meant for you Chris, I just need to learn not to be so hasty in my replies I suppose and keep it anonymous just in case I read something wrong again. :-/