by neufer » Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:41 pm
Floating a double-edged razor blade as a compass
bystander wrote:Benbrilling wrote:
"many times thinner, in relative proportion, than a razor blade." doesn't make any sort of sense. In proportion to what?
1 km in proportion to the overall size of the rings
is thinner, relatively speaking, than the edge of a razor blade in proportion to its size.
Another gross understatement
(only understood by those who were shaving back in the 70's):
Double-edged razor blade 39 x 20 x 0.25 mm [125 to 1]
Rings of Saturn 300,000 x 300,000 x 1 km [300,000 to 1]
3 x 3 cm. sheet of Gold Leaf: 30,000 x 30,000 x 0.1 µm [300,000 to 1]
[float=right][img]http://www.wildwoodsurvival.com/survival/navigation/rbcompass/rzrfloat.jpg[/img]
[c]Floating a double-edged razor blade as a compass[/c][/float][quote="bystander"][quote="Benbrilling"]
"many times thinner, in relative proportion, than a razor blade." doesn't make any sort of sense. In proportion to what?[/quote]
1 km in proportion to the overall size of the rings [b][i]is[/i][/b] thinner, relatively speaking, than the edge of a razor blade in proportion to its size.[/quote]
Another gross understatement
(only understood by those who were shaving back in the 70's):
Double-edged razor blade 39 x 20 x 0.25 mm [125 to 1]
Rings of Saturn 300,000 x 300,000 x 1 km [300,000 to 1]
3 x 3 cm. sheet of Gold Leaf: 30,000 x 30,000 x 0.1 µm [300,000 to 1]