Does Matter absorb space time?

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Does Matter absorb space time?

Does Matter absorb space-time?

by CryptoCurrencyPaf » Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:44 pm

Is it possible that matter can absorb space-time, altering the fabric of the universe in ways we have yet to fully understand? Could this phenomenon shed light on the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy?

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by plutoson » Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:56 pm

"Absorbing space-time" - what exactly do you mean by that? And what specifically are you referring to by "unexplained phenomena?" I am not sure I understand your question.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:04 pm

CryptoCurrencyPaf wrote: Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:01 pm Could matter be absorbing space-time, causing distortions in the fabric of the universe that we have yet to fully understand? Could this explain some of the unexplained phenomena we observe in the cosmos?
That question has no meaning unless you can express it mathematically.

Does Matter absorb space time?

by CryptoCurrencyPaf » Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:01 pm

Could matter be absorbing space-time, causing distortions in the fabric of the universe that we have yet to fully understand? Could this explain some of the unexplained phenomena we observe in the cosmos?

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Mon May 01, 2017 10:40 pm

Markus Schwarz wrote:
warmingwarmingwarming wrote:So matter falls into the BH but not the spacetime that is surrounding the matter?
Correct! Keep in mind that matter does not have to fall into the black hole. A star, or planet could orbit a black hole in the same way as the Earth orbits the Sun or the Moon orbits the Earth.
Pretty picky black hole.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Markus Schwarz » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:20 pm

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:So matter falls into the BH but not the spacetime that is surrounding the matter?
Correct! Keep in mind that matter does not have to fall into the black hole. A star, or planet could orbit a black hole in the same way as the Earth orbits the Sun or the Moon orbits the Earth.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:36 pm

Markus Schwarz wrote:
warmingwarmingwarming wrote:So, if a Black Hole is collapsed space time .. then the Black Hole must be always eating space time .. otherwise it cannot eat anything, that is, if it's a sealed unit.
A black hole is not collapsed spacetime. A black hole forms when matter, usually a star, collapses. When matter collapses its matter density increases (same amount of matter in less space). The matter density curves spacetime. For a black hole to form, the curvature must be large enough so that not even light can escape. Matter can still fall into the black hole, but not escape.
So matter falls into the BH but not the spacetime that is surrounding the matter?

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Markus Schwarz » Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:01 am

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:So, if a Black Hole is collapsed space time .. then the Black Hole must be always eating space time .. otherwise it cannot eat anything, that is, if it's a sealed unit.
A black hole is not collapsed spacetime. A black hole forms when matter, usually a star, collapses. When matter collapses its matter density increases (same amount of matter in less space). The matter density curves spacetime. For a black hole to form, the curvature must be large enough so that not even light can escape. Matter can still fall into the black hole, but not escape.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:28 am

Chris Peterson wrote:
warmingwarmingwarming wrote:http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/space/ ... al-mystery

You might say the accretion disk is eating matter, not the Black Hole, and that empty space lies between the disc and the hole. I suppose.
No. Matter is present in the accretion disk, and disappears into the black hole where the disk meets the event horizon. No gap exists.
So, if a Black Hole is collapsed space time .. then the Black Hole must be always eating space time .. otherwise it cannot eat anything, that is, if it's a sealed unit.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:08 am

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/space/ ... al-mystery

You might say the accretion disk is eating matter, not the Black Hole, and that empty space lies between the disc and the hole. I suppose.
No. Matter is present in the accretion disk, and disappears into the black hole where the disk meets the event horizon. No gap exists.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:06 am

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote: What images of black holes have you seen?
Just ordinary run of the mill stuff here on APOD and elsewhere .. always the image shows a Black Hole eating matter. Can you provide an image of a Black Hole NOT eating matter?
You have never seen an image of a black hole, because no such image has ever been made. What you've seen are artistic renderings of what some people think a black hole with an accretion disk might look like. But the vast majority of black holes don't have accretion disks, and are not detectable by any means other than observing the orbits of nearby stars (that is, for example, how we observe the black hole at the center of our own galaxy) or transient gravitational lensing. On APOD and other astronomical sites you may encounter accurate numerical simulations of black holes, converted to images:

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap160212.html
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141026.html
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap130702.html
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap130701.html

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:41 pm

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/space/ ... al-mystery

You might say the accretion disk is eating matter, not the Black Hole, and that empty space lies between the disc and the hole. I suppose.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:39 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
warmingwarmingwarming wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote: No, an insignificant amount of mass compared with the mass of the galaxy, and over billions of years. There is nothing that allows material to generally get closer to the center of a galaxy. A black hole only collects mass when there is some mechanism to bleed that mass of angular momentum. One is gravitational radiation, but that is only significant when a body is orbiting almost at the event horizon. The other is when gas or dust is dense enough that it acts like a fluid, and there are frictional losses. That's what forms an accretion disk. But most black holes don't have those, and most supermassive black holes only have them occasionally.

From the standpoint of a body orbiting a ways out from the center, the central mass is dominated by stars, not the black hole.
Please explain why I have not seen any suggestion of a Black Hole having consumed it's surrounding mass, and being left with vacant space surrounding it. In every image of a Black Hole I have seen the Black Hole is consuming matter. Of course you can easily suggest I have not searched thoroughly enough, in which case you will easily provide the image I search for.
What images of black holes have you seen?

Black holes normally have vacant space around them, just like stars.
Just ordinary run of the mill stuff here on APOD and elsewhere .. always the image shows a Black Hole eating matter. Can you provide an image of a Black Hole NOT eating matter?

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:29 pm

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote: No, an insignificant amount of mass compared with the mass of the galaxy, and over billions of years. There is nothing that allows material to generally get closer to the center of a galaxy. A black hole only collects mass when there is some mechanism to bleed that mass of angular momentum. One is gravitational radiation, but that is only significant when a body is orbiting almost at the event horizon. The other is when gas or dust is dense enough that it acts like a fluid, and there are frictional losses. That's what forms an accretion disk. But most black holes don't have those, and most supermassive black holes only have them occasionally.

From the standpoint of a body orbiting a ways out from the center, the central mass is dominated by stars, not the black hole.
Please explain why I have not seen any suggestion of a Black Hole having consumed it's surrounding mass, and being left with vacant space surrounding it. In every image of a Black Hole I have seen the Black Hole is consuming matter. Of course you can easily suggest I have not searched thoroughly enough, in which case you will easily provide the image I search for.
What images of black holes have you seen?

Black holes normally have vacant space around them, just like stars.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:26 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: No, an insignificant amount of mass compared with the mass of the galaxy, and over billions of years. There is nothing that allows material to generally get closer to the center of a galaxy. A black hole only collects mass when there is some mechanism to bleed that mass of angular momentum. One is gravitational radiation, but that is only significant when a body is orbiting almost at the event horizon. The other is when gas or dust is dense enough that it acts like a fluid, and there are frictional losses. That's what forms an accretion disk. But most black holes don't have those, and most supermassive black holes only have them occasionally.

From the standpoint of a body orbiting a ways out from the center, the central mass is dominated by stars, not the black hole.
Please explain why I have not seen any suggestion of a Black Hole having consumed it's surrounding mass, and being left with vacant space surrounding it. In every image of a Black Hole I have seen the Black Hole is consuming matter. Of course you can easily suggest I have not searched thoroughly enough, in which case you will easily provide the image I search for.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:25 pm

warmingwarmingwarming wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote:
Timbo69 wrote:When I look at a spiral galaxy, it appears to me like a drain, with much debris swirling to it's inevitable end, being sucked up by the huge super massive black holes at the center of it, like a huge water drain, all the debris, not really moving relative to its medium (the water), but just being sucked up by the flow of the medium, eventually, down the drain, except in this example, all the individual clumps of matter are also holes, and each hole an accumulation of many many smaller holes, any debris in the water can not fit down the drain, so it must clump together, and increase the size of the drain, causing an even faster flow, while it itself is being dragged.
Yet, this is just an illusion. In reality, nothing in a galaxy is being pulled into the center. Stars and gas follow approximately circular orbits. The central black hole, even in galaxies with active nucleuses, only absorbs an insignificant amount of mass, and that from very, very close to it.
" .... an insignificant amount of mass per unit of time only .. very significant over a larger unit of time .. also, according to your comment, each black hole should be surrounded by massless space, the black hole having consumed everything close to it, unless the universe was created, like, yesterday or the day before.
No, an insignificant amount of mass compared with the mass of the galaxy, and over billions of years. There is nothing that allows material to generally get closer to the center of a galaxy. A black hole only collects mass when there is some mechanism to bleed that mass of angular momentum. One is gravitational radiation, but that is only significant when a body is orbiting almost at the event horizon. The other is when gas or dust is dense enough that it acts like a fluid, and there are frictional losses. That's what forms an accretion disk. But most black holes don't have those, and most supermassive black holes only have them occasionally.

From the standpoint of a body orbiting a ways out from the center, the central mass is dominated by stars, not the black hole.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:32 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Timbo69 wrote:When I look at a spiral galaxy, it appears to me like a drain, with much debris swirling to it's inevitable end, being sucked up by the huge super massive black holes at the center of it, like a huge water drain, all the debris, not really moving relative to its medium (the water), but just being sucked up by the flow of the medium, eventually, down the drain, except in this example, all the individual clumps of matter are also holes, and each hole an accumulation of many many smaller holes, any debris in the water can not fit down the drain, so it must clump together, and increase the size of the drain, causing an even faster flow, while it itself is being dragged.
Yet, this is just an illusion. In reality, nothing in a galaxy is being pulled into the center. Stars and gas follow approximately circular orbits. The central black hole, even in galaxies with active nucleuses, only absorbs an insignificant amount of mass, and that from very, very close to it.
" .... an insignificant amount of mass per unit of time only .. very significant over a larger unit of time .. also, according to your comment, each black hole should be surrounded by massless space, the black hole having consumed everything close to it, unless the universe was created, like, yesterday or the day before.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by warmingwarmingwarming » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:28 pm

geckzilla wrote:One must also first get inside the box and be very familiar with it in order to think outside of it. ;)
Ah yes, and who is it that qualifies a person to be inside the box .. very often the very person who can't think outside the box, and who has gained his position of authority by NOT thinking outside the box, those also incapable of thinking outside the box setting up the position and the qualifier.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by neufer » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:26 pm

Uptod8t wrote:
If matter absorbed space-time matter might become more dense .. creating more gravity .. accounting for the once-huge beasts and vegetation on our planet to dwarf to the present sizes. Time would also change.
According to Einstein, matter does absorb space-time but it doesn't become more dense.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Uptod8t » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:54 pm

If matter absorbed space-time matter might become more dense .. creating more gravity .. accounting for the once-huge beasts and vegetation on our planet to dwarf to the present sizes. Time would also change.

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Fred the Cat » Thu May 19, 2016 5:44 pm

Even though I have read a fair amount about dark energy and dark matter as a layman I don't recall that its amount was known to be changing versus time in the universe. The significance of that tickles something in my brain that I am unable to scratch. Perhaps it would have made Fritz Zwicky itchy too as he proved to be a real-deal "Trump" of his time.

If nothing else that comparison would have stimulated a "thermal bremsstrahlung". :lol2:

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by tc;-) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:02 pm

;-) Love it.... The River Flows, The Water comes from somewhere... Space Time is expanding, Time Paradoxes are real if you acquire the Mass and Speed.. The differences in Time has to be evident through-out the universe. Because we all know this mass and speed is happening right Now !

tc

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by THX1138 » Sun May 17, 2015 4:40 pm

As Per Stephen King and he can't be wrong
As Per Stephen King and he can't be wrong
lang.jpg (2.58 KiB) Viewed 173115 times
None of you are actually serious right, after all it is common knowledge that the langoliers eat spacetime

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Ron-Astro Pharmacist » Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:06 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Ron-Astro Pharmacist wrote:With respect to my post 6/25/14 on "The Bridge", I will bring up the topic again regarding expansion, space and matter. I was questioning how we would know that matter itself hasn't always been expanding if it was occurring in a uniform reference frame to all other matter.
The question is meaningless unless you define what that expansion is in reference to, and at least how it might potentially be measured.
That is the truth. Lot's of imagination but no horsepower to back it up. I'll keep letting it stew and see if any new thoughts come to mind that make it a touch more more conceivable. I'd say it's only a matter of time but that's too corny. :lol2: Thanks for taking the time to read all of our crazy ideas and ushering replies. Ron

Re: Does Matter absorb space time?

by Chris Peterson » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:33 pm

Ron-Astro Pharmacist wrote:With respect to my post 6/25/14 on "The Bridge", I will bring up the topic again regarding expansion, space and matter. I was questioning how we would know that matter itself hasn't always been expanding if it was occurring in a uniform reference frame to all other matter.
The question is meaningless unless you define what that expansion is in reference to, and at least how it might potentially be measured.

Top