APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by owlice » Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:57 pm

A cuppa joe is a cup of coffee.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by alphachapmtl » Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:56 pm

owlice wrote:: falls over laughing! :

O, beyond, I'm SO glad I was eating my toast rather than swilling my cuppa joe, or I should have surely needed to issue an RKA (ruined keyboard alert)!! As it is, I have some crumbs to clean up, and there's peanut butter on the wall. Well worth the clean-up effort, that was; thank you very much!!

So if neufer is getting back to his "Neufermation" self, does that mean he is reneufermating? Perhaps he should sell tickets; I think I'd like to see this!
What is a "cuppa joe"?

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by alphachapmtl » Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:55 pm

owlice wrote:
Patiently waiting Yogi wrote:Spiral arms are essentially fixed standing waves and stars orbit into the concave side of these arms and come out the convex side of these arms.
So the arms aren't rotating, the galaxy as a whole doesn't rotate? Stars pass through them as they rotate around the galactic center; the composition of the arms change as stars move through them, is that right?
Same thing with water wave. A wave may cross the ocean, but the water doesn't travel with the wave.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Beyond » Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:44 pm

ME TOO!!

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by owlice » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:14 pm

: falls over laughing! :

O, beyond, I'm SO glad I was eating my toast rather than swilling my cuppa joe, or I should have surely needed to issue an RKA (ruined keyboard alert)!! As it is, I have some crumbs to clean up, and there's peanut butter on the wall. Well worth the clean-up effort, that was; thank you very much!!

So if neufer is getting back to his "Neufermation" self, does that mean he is reneufermating? Perhaps he should sell tickets; I think I'd like to see this!

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Beyond » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:01 pm

Owlice, in all fairness you should give him the benefit of the doubt of his being completely overwhelmed by the the new descriptive term that was done in Honor of what He does. Apparently it left him speechless and it's taking him a short time to re-adjust. I am sure that he will shortly be back to his "Neufermation" self and doing what He does best -- putting out neufermation AND writing you a poem. So in the meantime, perhaps this will tide you over?
An Ode to an owl;
How do i love thee, let me count the ways.
(1)-from afar - for owls are wary birds.
(2)-From close-up - My what big brown eyes you have.
(3)-from even closer with thick gloves - owls have very sharp talons.
(4)-With dead mice - owls are always hungry.
(5)-With a preening fork - so your feathers will always be in place and you will always look lovely.
(6)-From afar - as you leave at dusk to silently journey through the darkness of night.
(7)-by hearing your call from the distant forrest - I know that you DO give a Hoot for me.

I really must stop drinking these strange smelling multi-color drinks at Milliways. They make getting off the bar stool an adventure!

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by owlice » Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:45 am

neufer wrote: Well, I couldn't write my own poem for Owlice, so I guess this is the next best thing. :D
I didn't see this earlier! And I'm shocked, shocked, I tell you, to read that you could not write your own poem. I just cannot believe it! A man of your talents, wit, vocabulary, intellect, literary acumen, Googling abilities and familiarity with haikus and limericks, to say nothing of your wardrobe of red boots and purple sweatshirts, could surely manage a little poem!

I... I... I feel all woozy at your declaration of inability. The world is atilt, the stars are swimming in the heavens.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Beyond » Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:31 pm

neufer wrote:
beyond wrote:
Neufer-neufer, He's our man; if he can't find information on it, no-one can. Inner-space outer-space really doesn't matter, He'll get you the information quicker than a Mad Hatter. It may not be quite what you were looking for, but then again - it's never a bore. He'll throw at you facts and figures and even a little folk-lore. His loquacious way is known far and wide and from it HE cannot hide. Though he may speak from many a name, the end result is always the same.
There-fore today, in his Honor, i present a new term -- Neufermation. You could say it is very Artsy.
Well, I couldn't write my own poem for Owlice, so I guess this is the next best thing. :D
Hmmm...now i have to find something that rhymes with plagiarism :!:

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by owlice » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:38 pm

beyond wrote:There-fore today, in his Honor, i present a new term -- Neufermation. You could say it is very Artsy.
lol!! Oh, that's great!!

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by neufer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:40 pm

beyond wrote:
Neufer-neufer, He's our man; if he can't find information on it, no-one can. Inner-space outer-space really doesn't matter, He'll get you the information quicker than a Mad Hatter. It may not be quite what you were looking for, but then again - it's never a bore. He'll throw at you facts and figures and even a little folk-lore. His loquacious way is known far and wide and from it HE cannot hide. Though he may speak from many a name, the end result is always the same.
There-fore today, in his Honor, i present a new term -- Neufermation. You could say it is very Artsy.
Well, I couldn't write my own poem for Owlice, so I guess this is the next best thing. :D

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Beyond » Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:39 pm

Neufer-neufer, He's our man; if he can't find information on it, no-one can. Inner-space outer-space really doesn't matter, He'll get you the information quicker than a Mad Hatter. It may not be quite what you were looking for, but then again - it's never a bore. He'll throw at you facts and figures and even a little folk-lore. His loquacious way is known far and wide and from it HE cannot hide. Though he may speak from many a name, the end result is always the same.
There-fore today, in his Honor, i present a new term -- Neufermation. You could say it is very Artsy.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Chappy » Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:55 pm

All fascinating stuff!
Thanx for that chart/explanation neufer, it does make some sense how that can work all together to create a rotation.

It is amazing to think that what we see optically is only a small fraction of the mass needed to make all the gravitational computations work. I keep thinking...why can't we find some sort of proof (other than mathematically that is), for the presence of dark matter or energy? We have entered the realm of space itself in our quest for knowledge, yet this major part of our universe is untouchable, undetectable to our present sensor capabilities, we can't detect it in any way except by observing how it massively alters how visible matter behaves. We must almost be living literally in a soup of the stuff, yet we know relatively nothing about it.
I also know we "can" currently measure the distribution of DM using grav-lensing, but that's nothing like actually touching the stuff. If it has such a high mass, why can't we scoop some up and study it?

Damn cool stuff to contemplate IMO, but I sure wish we could bring a bottle of it back from our intra-solar journeys someday and study the stuff.
I know that's talking nonsense in today's world, but just maybe someday we'll be able to actually touch it.

The Yogi quotes are a nice touch too LOL

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by bystander » Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:24 pm

I think he was George W. Bush's speech writer.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by neufer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:52 pm

beyond wrote:
Baseball had it's Yogi Berra - and now i see Apod has a Yogi we have to beara. 8-)
8-) Lets hope he doesn't 'strike-out' toooo much :!:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/y/yogi_berra.html wrote:
Yogi Berra quotes:

A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore.

All pitchers are liars or crybabies.

Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.

Baseball is ninety percent mental and the other half is physical.

Congratulations. I knew the record would stand until it was broken.

Even Napoleon had his Watergate.

Half the lies they tell about me aren't true.

He hits from both sides of the plate. He's amphibious.

How can you think and hit at the same time?

I always thought that record would stand until it was broken.

I just want to thank everyone who made this day necessary.

I never blame myself when I'm not hitting. I just blame the bat and if it keeps up, I change bats.
After all, if I know it isn't my fault that I'm not hitting, how can I get mad at myself?

I never said most of the things I said.

I think Little League is wonderful. It keeps the kids out of the house.

I wish I had an answer to that because I'm tired of answering that question.

I'm a lucky guy and I'm happy to be with the Yankees. And I want to thank everyone for making this night necessary.

I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did.

If people don't want to come out to the ball park, nobody's gonna stop 'em.

If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.

If you ask me anything I don't know, I'm not going to answer.

If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.

In baseball, you don't know nothing.

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.

It ain't over till it's over.

It ain't the heat, it's the humility.

It gets late early out there.

It was impossible to get a conversation going, everybody was talking too much.

It's like deja-vu, all over again.

It's pretty far, but it doesn't seem like it.

Little League baseball is a very good thing because it keeps the parents off the streets.

Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded.

Slump? I ain't in no slump... I just ain't hitting.

So I'm ugly. So what? I never saw anyone hit with his face.

The future ain't what it used to be.

The other teams could make trouble for us if they win.

The towels were so thick there I could hardly close my suitcase.

There are some people who, if they don't already know, you can't tell 'em.

We have deep depth.

We made too many wrong mistakes.

When you arrive at a fork in the road, take it.

You better cut the pizza in four pieces because I'm not hungry enough to eat six.

You can observe a lot by just watching.

You should always go to other people's funerals, otherwise, they won't come to yours.

You wouldn't have won if we'd beaten you.

You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going, because you might not get there.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Beyond » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:43 pm

owlice wrote:Thanks, Yogi!
Baseball had it's Yogi Berra - and now i see Apod has a Yogi we have to beara. 8-) 8-) Lets hope he doesn't 'strike-out' toooo much :!:

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Don Lund » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:34 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Don Lund wrote:Umm, OK. But if DM behaves like any other matter in terms of its gravitational effects, why doesn't it orbit the galactic center faster near the center than it does much further out? My idiot impression is that DM is sort of gluing the galaxy together so that it rotates in a semi-rigid way, and somehow that just doesn't seem to make sense...
It is orbiting faster near the center. The dark matter halo is a lot larger, and a lot more massive, than the ordinary matter. So the entire gravitational environment around a galaxy is altered by its presence. In particular, the DM halo is spherical, and for any visible component of the galaxy, most of the mass will be outside its orbital radius.

The dark matter isn't strictly gluing anything together, although the analogy isn't too bad. And a galaxy doesn't rotate as if it were rigid- the inner stars orbit faster than the outer ones. It's just that the difference in rotational velocity is smaller than can be explained if the visible mass is all there is.
Thanks, Chris! I don't understand the dynamics here, out of my pay grade, I guess. To bring this down to Earth a bit: If a bunch of Jupiter-size planets were added to the solar system, orbiting at Mars or beyond, would the Earth orbit the sun more slowly? Thanks again...

Don Lund

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by neufer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:38 pm

nstahl wrote:
Thank you neufer. That's fascinating.

It explains how density waves could occur but brings up questions of how such correlated orbits came about.
(Assuming that this is basically the correct model) it is possibly that this is a quasi-stable mode for all these elliptical orbits in that the asymmetrical attraction of the spiral arms cause all of the elliptical orbits to precession clockwise at a relatively constant spin rate.

The clockwise precession rate would define the rotation rate of the spiral arms themselves.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:22 pm

Don Lund wrote:Umm, OK. But if DM behaves like any other matter in terms of its gravitational effects, why doesn't it orbit the galactic center faster near the center than it does much further out? My idiot impression is that DM is sort of gluing the galaxy together so that it rotates in a semi-rigid way, and somehow that just doesn't seem to make sense...
It is orbiting faster near the center. The dark matter halo is a lot larger, and a lot more massive, than the ordinary matter. So the entire gravitational environment around a galaxy is altered by its presence. In particular, the DM halo is spherical, and for any visible component of the galaxy, most of the mass will be outside its orbital radius.

The dark matter isn't strictly gluing anything together, although the analogy isn't too bad. And a galaxy doesn't rotate as if it were rigid- the inner stars orbit faster than the outer ones. It's just that the difference in rotational velocity is smaller than can be explained if the visible mass is all there is.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by nstahl » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:47 am

Earlier, Magellan Starswarm asked whether all the spiral galaxies lined up the same way. Here's something pertinent from neufer's Wikipedia article on Spiral Galaxies:
Alignment of spin axis with cosmic voids
Recent results suggest that the orientation of the spin axis of spiral galaxies is not a chance result, but instead they are preferentially aligned along the surface of cosmic voids. That is, spiral galaxies tend to be oriented at a high angle of inclination relative to the large-scale structure of the surroundings. They have been described as lining up like "beads on a string," with their axis of rotation following the filaments around the edges of the voids.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by nstahl » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:38 am

Thank you neufer. That's fascinating. It explains how density waves could occur but brings up questions of how such correlated orbits came about.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Don Lund » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:23 am

The explanation involves the presence of a large amount of dark matter, which is like any other matter in terms of its gravitational effects, but doesn't interact with electromagnetic radiation, so is essentially invisible to us.
Umm, OK. But if DM behaves like any other matter in terms of its gravitational effects, why doesn't it orbit the galactic center faster near the center than it does much further out? My idiot impression is that DM is sort of gluing the galaxy together so that it rotates in a semi-rigid way, and somehow that just doesn't seem to make sense...

Don Lund

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:40 am

Chappy wrote:They spin at almost exactly the same rate at the center as they do at the edge, meaning that something is basically holding it all together as one solid kinda piece.
The leading hypothesis of course, is that space & time constitute a fabric like substance due to dark matter/energy, and because of being suspended, so to speak, in this fabric, the entire Galaxy spins as a single object while individual objects within the galaxies are doing there own thing...kinda...in a way...sorta.
Half right. Nothing to do with the fabric of space or dark energy. The explanation involves the presence of a large amount of dark matter, which is like any other matter in terms of its gravitational effects, but doesn't interact with electromagnetic radiation, so is essentially invisible to us.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by neufer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:42 am

Chappy wrote:
From what I understand, and it is limited, Galaxies do rotate, but unlike how you would think. Since the laws of physics state that a spinning object rotates faster the closer you get to it's rotational center, you would expect Galaxies to basically spin themselves to pieces since they are not a solid piece of matter, and the outer arms would lag so far behind that it would be a jumbled mess in no time....but they don't.

They spin at almost exactly the same rate at the center as they do at the edge, meaning that something is basically holding it all together as one solid kinda piece.
Unlike planets around a sun, stars orbit at almost exactly the same velocity at the center as they do at the edge.

However the spiral arms are density waves that don't get all wound up like the stars themselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_galaxy wrote: The first acceptable theory for the spiral structure
was devised by C. C. Lin and Frank Shu in 1964.

* They suggested that the spiral arms were manifestations of spiral density waves.

* They assumed that the stars travel in slightly elliptical orbits and that the orientations of their orbits is correlated i.e. the ellipses vary in their orientation (one to another) in a smooth way with increasing distance from the galactic centre. This is illustrated in the diagram. It is clear that the elliptical orbits come close together in certain areas to give the effect of arms. Stars therefore do not remain forever in the position that we now see them in, but pass through the arms as they travel in their orbits.

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by Chappy » Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:01 am

From what I understand, and it is limited, Galaxies do rotate, but unlike how you would think. Since the laws of physics state that a spinning object rotates faster the closer you get to it's rotational center, you would expect Galaxies to basically spin themselves to pieces since they are not a solid piece of matter, and the outer arms would lag so far behind that it would be a jumbled mess in no time....but they don't.
They spin at almost exactly the same rate at the center as they do at the edge, meaning that something is basically holding it all together as one solid kinda piece.
The leading hypothesis of course, is that space & time constitute a fabric like substance due to dark matter/energy, and because of being suspended, so to speak, in this fabric, the entire Galaxy spins as a single object while individual objects within the galaxies are doing there own thing...kinda...in a way...sorta.
If we look at it as similar to, say a bedsheet, then it's easier to see how such standing waves could occur.

Did I get that right?
If not, just ignore this blathering idiot over in the corner.. :mrgreen:

Re: APOD: M33: Triangulum Galaxy (2010 Dec 03)

by nstahl » Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:36 pm

What on earth :) would generate a standing wave in a galaxy? In a stream it's a rock. In a wind instrument it's the resonating chamber. Or it can be waves of equal amplitude and opposite velocity. None of those seems likely to apply in a galactic disc.

Also, given the time scales involved, have we observed galaxies long enough to be sure the spiral arms are standing waves?

Top