Starship Asterisk*

odysseus14 wrote:I was just wondering what that object is, on the same horizontal line, as the earth and moon, off to the right of the image. Is that Jupiter off in the distance?

Chris Peterson wrote: Which solves the apparent confusion with image scale. The spacing between the Earth and the Moon in the image is exactly as you'd expect for a 1024x1024 pixel camera with a 10.5° field of view. What this means is that neither the Earth nor the Moon is even close to being resolved in the image. Each is actually much smaller than a single pixel. The apparent sizes are purely a function of their brightness and the combination of diffraction and optical artifacts. The relative difference in size is determined by their relative difference in brightness. The only thing actually resolved in the image is the separation between the two bodies.

neufer wrote:Excellent piece of sleuthing, alter-ego

neufer wrote:In fact, the Moon was at its maximum apparent
distance from the Earth at this time =>

BMAONE23 wrote:

drollere wrote:i didn't vote for this image and regret that it was posted because it grossly misrepresents both the relative sizes of the earth and moon (because the moon has a higher albedo) and grossly misrepresents the earth/moon distance relative to size.

image size of earth = 11 pixels
image size of moon = 5 pixels
actual earth diameter = 7926 miles
therefore, actual moon diameter = 7926 * 5/11 = 3600 miles OH SO WRONG!

earth based pixel scale = 7926/11 = 720 miles
image separation earth/moon = 12 pixels
therefore, earth/moon orbital distance = 720*12 = 8647 miles OH SO WRONG!

i've attached an image below that shows the correct proportions without image flare and/or the conjectural, post hoc suggestion of orbital foreshortening.

when you have viewers who dwell on the flattening of the earth on one side, without noticing that all the star images are elongated vertically, you realize the importance of posting astronomical images that do not invite gross misinterpretation, especially when the picture commentary makes no attempt to correct them.

What it shows is their relative brightness at the distance specified. As for the separation problem, the Moon was more than likely not at its maximum apparent distance from the Earth. It could have been in front of the Earth relative to the camera position thereby making it appear both too close and too bright.

alter-ego wrote:
Nothing made sense when I tried to identify more stars, but I think I have now located the picture. It's in exactly the same location -- I made the wrong assumption about the APOD picture orientation (maybe most of us did). In the simulator, I zoomed in to the Earth (0.5º FOV) was surprised to find the Moon on the left side of the Earth not the right. The orbs are on the same axis, just reversed left to right! In fact it turns out the picture is clocked 180º from the simulator view (with a little added rotation). It's amazing how perspective can affect understanding.

The particular star in question earlier is δ Scorpii, and the obvious pair of stars is ω1,2 Scorpii. I believe they are the same fields by virtue of how many common stars there are. I cannot find all the stars, but one field is a picture and the other is a simulation, so I'm happy and convinced they are the same.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dschubba wrote:
<<Delta Scorpii (δ Sco / δ Scorpii) is a star in the constellation Scorpius. It has the traditional name Dschubba (or Dzuba, from Arabic jabhat, "forehead" (of the scorpion) or also Iclarcrau or Iclarkrav. Because Delta Scorpii is near the ecliptic it is occasionally occulted by the Moon, or (extremely rare) by planets.

In June 2000, Delta Scorpii was observed by Sebastian Otero to be 0.1 magnitudes brighter than normal. Its brightness has varied since then and has reached as high as magnitude 1.6 or 1.7, altering the familiar appearance of Scorpius. Spectra taken after the outburst began have shown that Delta Sco is throwing off luminous gases from its equatorial region. As of 2005 the flareup continues. Although the brightness varies, it remains well above its previous constant magnitude.

Dschubba is accompanied by a class B star that orbits the primary every 20 days at a distance comparable to the distance from the Sun to Mercury. Furthermore, there is a star that takes about 10 years to orbit Dschubba in a highly eccentric orbit that takes it close in to the primary once a decade. The last close encounter of these two stars happened in mid-2000 and it may have triggered the outburst of the primary star. A possible fourth companion star lies at about twice the distance again from the main star.>>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Scorpii wrote:
<<The Bayer designation Omega Scorpii (ω Sco / ω Scorpii) is shared by two stars, ω¹ Scorpii and ω² Scorpii, in the constellation Scorpius. They are separated by 0.24° on the sky. [Ergo: The ~10° size of the APOD picture is about right] Omega Scorpii also has the traditional name Jabhat al Akrab, which is derived from the Arabic جبهة العقرب jabhat al-caqrab meaning "[The] forehead of the scorpion".

[Double star above: Beta Scorpii in http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090521.html. ]

ω¹ Scorpii : Omega-1 Scorpii is a blue-white B-type dwarf with an apparent magnitude of +3.93. It is approximately 424 light years from Earth.
ω² Scorpii : Omega-2 Scorpii is a yellow G-type bright giant with an apparent magnitude of +4.31. It is approximately 265 light years from Earth.>>

Chris Peterson wrote:

pking51 wrote:Would the earth / moon pair be visible to the naked eye from this position? Or would one need binoculars or telescope?

No, if you were seeing this with your unaided eye, you would not be able to resolve the pair. .... at other points of the Moon's orbit you would easily be able to see the Earth and Moon as separate points of light. Neither would be big enough to resolve as a disc, however.

alter-ego wrote:

neufer wrote:This would make the likely star candidate Zubenelgenubi in Libra.

Bingo, α Librae.

Chris Peterson wrote:Superior planets, however, never make such a large angle between the Sun and the observer, so they vary between 100% and somewhat less than that- but nowhere near 0%.

jerrythebiker wrote:Is it possible that the brighter object being discussed could be Andromeda?

jerrythebiker wrote:I am not clear on where in the constellations that Earth and the Moon appear, but I do think I recognize Perseus near the top center of the picture, just above and to the right of the Earth-Moon combo.

jerrythebiker wrote:Is it possible that the brighter object being discussed could be Andromeda? I am not clear on where in the constellations that Earth and the Moon appear, but I do think I recognize Perseus near the top center of the picture, just above and to the right of the Earth-Moon combo.

kimen wrote:i know the distance between earth and moon is more than 20 times the earth diameter. why in this picture the distance between earth and moon is almost equal the earth diameter?

neufer wrote:This would make the likely star candidate Zubenelgenubi in Libra.

Chris Peterson wrote:

neufer wrote:

Chris Peterson wrote:If Earth was in Cancer from the viewpoint of MESSENGER, there's no way Aldebaran (in Taurus) could possibly be in the same image. It would be far out of the field of view... it is very unclear to me just what we are seeing here.

In fact, on May 6, 2010 it was MESSENGER that was in Taurus (below & to the right of the Pleiades) from the viewpoint of Earth according to NASA's Solar System Simulator

So the Earth (from MESSENGER's viewpoint) should really be near the ecliptic to the right in Scorpius (6 months away from Taurus)...

It looks like the angle between the Earth, Sun, and MESSENGER is about 12°, so that is almost one full month of difference, or one zodiacal constellation.

Chris Peterson wrote:When I said I didn't know what I was seeing here, I wasn't referring to the sky itself (although I don't, in fact, recognize the background), but to the nature of the image itself, which seems to show a scale that is not consistent with the instrument that is reported to have produced it.

Chakolate wrote:I hope this isn't too stupid a question, but why are there never phases of Earth from Mercury? It is because Mercury's orbit is so close to the sun? I tried figuring it out with a light bulb and a couple of balls, and got nowhere.

phumphreys wrote:I had the same question and I don't think it's a bad one. At 1/4 phase (half illumination) we should see a separation of about 30 Earth diameters. I'd like to know the actual date of the photo to check this - as shown this would have to be just a day from full phase or new phase for the scale to be right.

When I said I didn't know what I was seeing here, I wasn't referring to the sky itself (although I don't, in fact, recognize the background), but to the nature of the image itself, which seems to show a scale that is not consistent with the instrument that is reported to have produced it.

emc wrote:
BTW - I think your “Resident Geezer” nickname chould change to “Hyperteria Monokyklou Star Pilot”… or perhaps “Envisage Astroventurer” if they are trying to keep the nicknames short.

neufer wrote:

Chris Peterson wrote:If Earth was in Cancer from the viewpoint of MESSENGER, there's no way Aldebaran (in Taurus) could possibly be in the same image. It would be far out of the field of view... it is very unclear to me just what we are seeing here.

May 6, 2010: MESSENGER from the viewpoint of Earth using [url=http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/][b]NASA's Solar System Simulator[/b][/url]

---

In fact, on May 6, 2010 it was MESSENGER that was in Taurus (below & to the right of the Pleiades) from the viewpoint of Earth according to NASA's Solar System Simulator =>

So the Earth (from MESSENGER's viewpoint) should really be near the ecliptic to the right in Scorpius (6 months away from Taurus)...