APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by niteman1946 » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:07 pm

This may aready have been mentioned, but I believe APOD has the galaxy designations reversed. NGC5216 s.b. NGC5218 and vice versa.
Mark

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by cseligman » Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:30 am

::red-faced grin:: Sorry about that. Miscopied my own page. Trouble came from sending a note directly to APoD a while back, then being directed to this thread, and mis-editing the original email to fit the thread. You are correct. Entire extent is about 250 thousand light years, so "string" between the galaxies is less than half that amount.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by rstevenson » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:44 pm

cseligman wrote:... and the "string" between the two galaxies is more like 250 thousand light years
across, not 22 thousand. ... (See http://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc52.htm and scroll down to NGC 5216 and 5218 for a correct discussion of the system.)
That "correct discussion" says "The overall extent of Keenan's system, from one galaxy to the other, and the trails of gas extending between and beyond them, is about 250 thousand light years." So the string itself can't be anywhere near that long. Given the galaxy widths of approximately 55 and 75 thousand light years, and the fact that the tails also go out the sides opposite (more or less) to the string, the string length between the galaxies must be closer to 115 thousand light years.

Rob (who played with a bolas when but a mere yout')

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by cseligman » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:53 pm

The APoD discussion of Keenan's System (NGC 5216 and 5218) repeats a common error in its distance and dimensions.
NASA/IPAC NED, HyperLeda, and NOAO all present data showing that both recessional
velocity and redshift-independent distance estimates are 130 to 160 million light years,
not 17 million, and the "string" between the two galaxies is more like 250 thousand light years
across, not 22 thousand. So the dimensions and distances are off by nearly a factor of ten. This is why the apparent sizes translate to less than ten thousand light years, which is far too small for them to have such a spectacular interaction. Using the correct distance, the galaxies turn out to be about 55 and 75 thousand light years across. (See http://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc52.htm and scroll down to NGC 5216 and 5218 for a correct discussion of the system.)

Courtney Seligman
Professor of Astronomy
Long Beach City College

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by Chris Peterson » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:12 pm

NoelC wrote:Keep your editorial comments to yourself, Chris. You do nothing but dig yourself into a hole with a personal attack uttered publicly. Clearly your intent was to hurt someone with it.
Sorry, I disagree. You've been around this group long enough to know that Harry's posts are often disruptive, non-topical, and violate the rules of the forum. He's often at risk of being banned.

The statement was one of fact: evidence is seldom of interest to him, and his posts (including the one referenced) are frequently not relevant to the discussion at hand. This is worth pointing out to people who read these forums and are likely to be confused. Certainly the post regarding jets was nonsense.

Although I don't really think it was Bystander's intent, he was really just feeding a troll with his response.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by NoelC » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:01 pm

Bystander's response is perfectly reasonable, but Chris' comment is way out of line.

Keep your editorial comments to yourself, Chris. You do nothing but dig yourself into a hole with a personal attack uttered publicly. Clearly your intent was to hurt someone with it.

-Noel

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by harry » Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:14 am

G'day

And you call yourselves scientists with that attitude.

Look and research the formation of jets.

Should I give the links or are you able to research it.

If you know anything about Vector Theory you would understand.

do a bit of research on arXiv or NASA ADS

Supersymmetric Configurations
Electric-Magnetic Duality
R-Invariance
Spontaneous Gauge Symmetry-Breaking

as for silly comments by Chris
You know that Harry is obsessed by jets, imagined or otherwise. Nor has evidence ever been of interest to him. Indeed, I think a lack of evidence usually reinforces his ideas- that is, after all, a key feature of the pseudoscientist
I have no time for.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:11 pm

bystander wrote:What evidence do you have that this is what's happening?
You know that Harry is obsessed by jets, imagined or otherwise. Nor has evidence ever been of interest to him. Indeed, I think a lack of evidence usually reinforces his ideas- that is, after all, a key feature of the pseudoscientist.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by bystander » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:45 am

harry wrote:G'day

The bottom Galaxy had formed a dipole jet and one has connected with the above galaxy.

The bottom jet has twisted because of the dual gravity pulled by the top galaxy and its own galaxy core.

These type of jets are normal and observable

Chandra Observes Cosmic Traffic Pile-Up In Energetic Quasar Jet
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/00_rel ... 3c273.html

and
Spectacular X-ray Jet Points Toward Cosmic Energy Booster
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/00_rel ... 00pic.html

and
"Death Star" Galaxy Black Hole Fires at Neighboring Galaxy
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archiv ... s/2007/37/
What evidence do you have that this is what's happening? I see no similarities, at all. :?
For a more plausible explanation, just view the video Adam mentioned.
ngc1535 wrote:I believe you can even watch it on a YouTube video:
Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by harry » Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:31 am

G'day

The bottom Galaxy had formed a dipole jet and one has connected with the above galaxy.

The bottom jet has twisted because of the dual gravity pulled by the top galaxy and its own galaxy core.

These type of jets are normal and observable

Chandra Observes Cosmic Traffic Pile-Up In Energetic Quasar Jet
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/00_rel ... 3c273.html

and
Spectacular X-ray Jet Points Toward Cosmic Energy Booster
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/00_rel ... 00pic.html

and
"Death Star" Galaxy Black Hole Fires at Neighboring Galaxy
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archiv ... s/2007/37/

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by NoelC » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:27 am

No worries Adam. It's an easy mistake to make.

-Noel

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ngc1535 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:31 am

That is a very nice tool. Thank you for posting it. I wish it would better attribute image sources though...
I have fixed the images on my website. I can't do anything about the images that are now "out there" in cyberspace.

I am still recovering from this mortifying incident. It is, however, an interesting feeling to know someone is looking that closely to my work.

Adam

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by astro800 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:39 pm

ngc1535 wrote:
NoelC wrote:In another thread, someone asks:
astro800 wrote:I just wondering what is it at (13:32:39, 62°42’52″). Is it a supernova? The object does not exist on DSS nor SDSS surveys. Thanks.
DARN IT! BLAST IT!
(I hate when that happens).
Yes. that appears to be a mouse click with the paint brush.
I probably inadvertently clicked on the image when I was preparing the JPEG for the web. It is NOT in any of my data.
Sorry.
Good eyes for those that found this.

Regards,
Adam Block
Ah, c'mon. I thought I just discovered new type of supernova. The fuzzy one :)
BTW, you can instantly overlay DSS, SDSS and other images over any astronomical image on a web page by entering following URL in browsers address line:

Code: Select all

javascripta=document.createElement('script');a.src='http://sky-map.org/js/astroOverlay';a.onload=function(){astroOverlay()};document.body.appendChild(a);void+0
(it doesn't work in MS Internet Explorer only)

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ngc1535 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:56 am

clicked... (I give up)

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ngc1535 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:56 am

And I typed that so fast I left out words. Sorry again.
Yes, that appears to be a mouse click with the paint brush.
I probably inadvertently click on the image when I was preparing the JPEG for the web....
Adam

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ngc1535 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:54 am

NoelC wrote:In another thread, someone asks:
astro800 wrote:I just wondering what is it at (13:32:39, 62°42’52″). Is it a supernova? The object does not exist on DSS nor SDSS surveys. Thanks.
Ooh, I love questions like this.

This is the object to which you are referring, no?

Image

I pulled POSS2 plate data from the DSS, and you're right, it doesn't show there:

Image

Looking very closely and critically at it, it's too soft to be a point light source. And it's more symmetrical than most of the rest of the objects in the image.

If I had to guess I'd say it was a processing mistake - possibly an accidental click of a paintbrush tool on the image. Or possibly something put there on purpose to help identify the image if it should be repurposed.

-Noel
DARN IT! BLAST IT!
(I hate when that happens).
Yes. that appears to be a mouse click with the paint brush.
I probably inadvertently clicked on the image when I was preparing the JPEG for the web. It is NOT in any of my data.
Sorry.
Good eyes for those that found this.

Regards,
Adam Block

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by NoelC » Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:18 am

In another thread, someone asks:
astro800 wrote:I just wondering what is it at (13:32:39, 62°42’52″). Is it a supernova? The object does not exist on DSS nor SDSS surveys. Thanks.
Ooh, I love questions like this.

This is the object to which you are referring, no?

Image

I pulled POSS2 plate data from the DSS, and you're right, it doesn't show there:

Image

Looking very closely and critically at it, it's too soft to be a point light source. And it's more symmetrical than most of the rest of the objects in the image.

If I had to guess I'd say it was a processing mistake - possibly an accidental click of a paintbrush tool on the image. Or possibly something put there on purpose to help identify the image if it should be repurposed.

-Noel

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by DavidLeodis » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:26 pm

There is a very interesting looking hook-like blue galaxy at about 2 o'clock from NGC 5128 at about mid way between NGC 5128 and a larger blue galaxy (the larger image brought up by clicking on the APOD shows the hook-like galaxy better).

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ngc1535 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:57 am

verkle2 wrote:Perhaps this line just happens to be superimposed on another galaxy. I notice that there is a similar line moving away from the galaxy on the opposite side. Why does it have to mean that these 2 galaxies are interacting? What is the physical methods that could even take place to create such a clean line between galaxies? There are too many such questions that need to be answered before coming up with such an explanation that is given today.

HI,

You really need to watch the animation/visualization for this N-body code. Gravity, for all of its simplicity, makes the most remarkable structures in our Universe.

I believe you can even watch it on a YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbXgQaCobLc

Regards,
Adam Block

PhysOrg: Colliding Galaxies

by bystander » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:51 pm

Colliding galaxies
PhysOrg | Astronomy | 02 July 2010
NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day website has published an image taken from the Mount Lemmon SkyCenter. The image, posted July 2, is that of the Keenan system of colliding galaxies and was collected during an Astronomer Night program at the observatory by Adam Block, who is also the observing programs coordinator at the SkyCenter.

"A fascinating aspect to this image is that it resembles the outcome of a computer simulation designed to demonstrate the result of galactic collisions," Block said.

"Long ago I was inspired by the work of John Dubinski and others on what are called galactic mergers. Dubinski created code that ran on a supercomputer to simulate the merger of the Milky Way, where we live, and our nearest large neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy, to create Milkomeda," Block said.

The movie that Dubinski made, part of his GRAVITAS series, is sometimes used at the Mount Lemmon SkyCenter's program. Block said, "There is a point in the simulation where the resulting pattern looks - to my eye - very similar to NGC 5216, the Keenan system."

"Assuming that the physics are correct, it is remarkable that the universe is large enough to express examples of all potential possibilities. This lends credence to the idea that astrophysical computer simulations may be predictive," he said.

Block said the tidal stream that seems to connect the galaxies with their two counter-oriented tidal tails is represented well in the comparison. The pattern, he said, exists only briefly in the full simulation.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by owlice » Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:05 pm

This is a new image. APOD does rerun images, usually on weekends (especially Sunday). More information on that is here: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap_faq.html

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by ?????? » Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:01 pm

Is it just me or does it seem that APOD is recycling images.... The universe hasn't run out of cool stuff to look at yet has it?

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by Todd Thomas » Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:07 pm

Todd Thomas wrote:...10,000 ly in diameter, which seems really small for typical spiral and elliptical galaxies.
Guess I need to research this more. Found this quote at http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_a ... 1205a.html:

"Most of the galaxies in the universe are actually smaller than the Milky Way. For example, most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are at least ten times smaller in diameter." -- Michael Loewenstein and David Marsden for "Ask an Astrophysicist"

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by Todd Thomas » Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:55 pm

Guest wrote:The 'string' connecting the gxys do not seem to be 22,000 ly. At 17m ly away, comparing the size of the gxy's to the string it seems more like 100,000+ ly.
I too was curious about the 22,000 ly figure. That would make the galaxies roughly 10,000 ly in diameter, which seems really small for typical spiral and elliptical galaxies. 10,000 ly is roughly Magellanic-Cloud-sized.

Re: APOD: Galaxies on a String (2010 Jul 02)

by moonstruck » Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:22 pm

Ahh, The Supreme Architect of the Universe.

Top