by pebble » Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:41 pm
I've looked long and hard at these two images, and the leftmost image sure looks like someone's done a crude photoshop job on it.
How can the upper layer of Titan's haze become occluded by the shadow edge of distant Tethys? And why does the bright edge of Tethys cut a very artificial-looking notch into Titan's haze? These are optical and geometric impossibilities.
Rest assured I'm not one of those moon hoax people: I accept the moon landings as reality. Also, I'm not saying the image is a deliberate fake, I just don't know how to account for these unnatural artifacts which could not be present in such a photograph, unless it has been manipulated. I'm a visual effects artist with over a decade's experience in feature films, and some of my work has involved making believable spacescapes just like this one. If I produced a shot like this photo, the visual effects supervisor would bounce it back with a note saying "do it right".
Perhaps someone hand-adjusted brightness levels over Tethys, just to make a more pleasing exposure? But I'd expect the haze component of those RGB values to be boosted as well. A friend suggested maybe it's a halation effect, but that would take place in the camera, and any resulting glow would splash over everything, not respect the shadow edge of Tethys.
To my eye, someone has doctored this image to make it more dramatic. They certainly succeeded! But is it accurate? I'd really like to see the raw image. Any chance of that?
I've looked long and hard at these two images, and the leftmost image sure looks like someone's done a crude photoshop job on it.
How can the upper layer of Titan's haze become occluded by the shadow edge of distant Tethys? And why does the bright edge of Tethys cut a very artificial-looking notch into Titan's haze? These are optical and geometric impossibilities.
Rest assured I'm not one of those moon hoax people: I accept the moon landings as reality. Also, I'm not saying the image is a deliberate fake, I just don't know how to account for these unnatural artifacts which could not be present in such a photograph, unless it has been manipulated. I'm a visual effects artist with over a decade's experience in feature films, and some of my work has involved making believable spacescapes just like this one. If I produced a shot like this photo, the visual effects supervisor would bounce it back with a note saying "do it right".
Perhaps someone hand-adjusted brightness levels over Tethys, just to make a more pleasing exposure? But I'd expect the haze component of those RGB values to be boosted as well. A friend suggested maybe it's a halation effect, but that would take place in the camera, and any resulting glow would splash over everything, not respect the shadow edge of Tethys.
To my eye, someone has doctored this image to make it more dramatic. They certainly succeeded! But is it accurate? I'd really like to see the raw image. Any chance of that?