APOD: Art And Science NGC 918 (2009 Nov 12)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: APOD: Art And Science NGC 918 (2009 Nov 12)

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Indigo_Sunrise » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:54 pm

bystander wrote:A-Z: 1-26
aa-az: 27-52 (1*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]
ba-bz: 53-78 (2*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]
...
za-zz: 677-702 (26*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]

nc = (14*26)+3 = 367

Don't know what they will do for 703.
Perhaps aaa (1*26^2)+(1*26)+(1).

Thank you bystander. This explanation is very helpful!
8)

Re: Art And Science NGC 918 (2009 November 12)

by orin stepanek » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:33 am

Freefall74 wrote:Is this NGC 981 or 918???
Oh Oh! Another typo! :oops: I'll correct it. I guess someone already has.
Orin

Re: Art And Science NGC 981

by orin stepanek » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:24 am

neufer wrote: 1 to 2 per day :?:
Ya! Thanks Art! That's what I wanted to type. My error! Guess I was in too big a hurry to go to Omaha this morning; and did a poor Job proofreading. :oops:

Orin

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by TheBigHenry » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:45 pm

Indigo_Sunrise wrote:
bystander wrote:
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:Apologies for being late to the discussion, but where does the number '26' come from??? I understand the 10, with 'J' being the tenth letter, and 'S' is the nineteenth, of course, but I cannot figure out where the 26 is coming from..? :?
26 letters in the alphabet :!: :idea:
neufer: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova#Naming_convention]Wikipedia: Supernova: Naming Convention[/url] wrote:
Supernova discoveries are reported to the International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, which sends out a circular with the name it assigns to it. The name is formed by the year of discovery, immediately followed by a one or two-letter designation. The first 26 supernovae of the year get designated with an upper case letter from A to Z. Afterward, pairs of lower-case letters are used, starting with aa, ab, and so on. Professional and amateur astronomers find several hundreds of supernovae each year (367 in 2005, 551 in 2006 and 572 in 2007). For example, the last supernova of 2005 was SN 2005nc, indicating that it was the 367th supernova found in 2005.
Okay, so every SN discovered after one designated with a capital letter 'Z' would automatically get multiplied by 26?????

I know I'm not as smart as many of the posters here, but no where in that wiki link does it spell out or clarify the 'equation' for naming SN's. (either that, or I'm even more dense than I thought! :oops: )

Try as I might, I don't see how 367 was arrived at, in the final example. Would someone mind spelling it out for me? (In small words - :lol: ) And for the record, I understand that 'n' is the 14th letter of the alphabet, and 'c' is the 3rd.

Thank you, once again, in advance.....

A thru Z is equal to 1 thru 26 (decimal);
aa is 27 (decimal);
ab is 28 (dec) etc.

and in general: nc = (26)n + c = (26)(14) + 3 =367

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by bystander » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:19 pm

A-Z: 1-26
aa-az: 27-52 (1*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]
ba-bz: 53-78 (2*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]
...
za-zz: 677-702 (26*26)+... [(a-z) (1-26)]

nc = (14*26)+3 = 367

Don't know what they will do for 703.
Perhaps aaa (1*26^2)+(1*26)+(1).

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Indigo_Sunrise » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:56 pm

bystander wrote:
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:Apologies for being late to the discussion, but where does the number '26' come from??? I understand the 10, with 'J' being the tenth letter, and 'S' is the nineteenth, of course, but I cannot figure out where the 26 is coming from..? :?
26 letters in the alphabet :!: :idea:
neufer wrote:
Wikipedia: Supernova: Naming Convention wrote:
Supernova discoveries are reported to the International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, which sends out a circular with the name it assigns to it. The name is formed by the year of discovery, immediately followed by a one or two-letter designation. The first 26 supernovae of the year get designated with an upper case letter from A to Z. Afterward, pairs of lower-case letters are used, starting with aa, ab, and so on. Professional and amateur astronomers find several hundreds of supernovae each year (367 in 2005, 551 in 2006 and 572 in 2007). For example, the last supernova of 2005 was SN 2005nc, indicating that it was the 367th supernova found in 2005.

Okay, so every SN discovered after one designated with a capital letter 'Z' would automatically get multiplied by 26?????
I know I'm not as smart as many of the posters here, but no where in that wiki link does it spell out or clarify the 'equation' for naming SN's. (either that, or I'm even more dense than I thought! :oops: )
Try as I might, I don't see how 367 was arrived at, in the final example. Would someone mind spelling it out for me? (In small words - :lol: ) And for the record, I understand that 'n' is the 14th letter of the alphabet, and 'c' is the 3rd.

Thank you, once again, in advance.....

Re: Art And Science NGC 918 (2009 November 12)

by TheBigHenry » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:55 pm

bystander wrote:
TheBigHenry wrote:Is it NGC 981 or NGC 918 (as the linked-to sites refer to it)?
I'm fairly certain it is NGC 918, even the APOD link galaxy NGC 981 links to the NED entry for NGC 918. And the Sky Factory Deep Sky Catalogue picture for NGC 918 (rotated cw 90) certainly looks more like the APOD than NGC 981.
Thanx, bystander.

Re: Art And Science NGC 918 (2009 November 12)

by bystander » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:32 pm

TheBigHenry wrote:Is it NGC 981 or NGC 918 (as the linked-to sites refer to it)?
I'm fairly certain it is NGC 918, even the APOD link galaxy NGC 981 links to the NED entry for NGC 918. And the Sky Factory Deep Sky Catalogue picture for NGC 918 (rotated cw 90) certainly looks more like the APOD than NGC 981.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by TheBigHenry » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:25 pm

Is it NGC 981 or NGC 918 (as the linked-to sites refer to it)?

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by apodman » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:20 pm

Never happens to me. Notice how my fingers never leave my hands. Figured you'd fix it so I jumped on you while I had the chance. Just slinging without malice again. And I find Johnny Rico humorous in a starched Heinlein sort of way.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by bystander » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:17 pm

apodman wrote:
bystander wrote:NGC 981 is in Cetus not Aires, where NGC 918 is.
Johnny Rico wrote:I'm from Buenos Aires, and I say kill 'em all!
:oops: :lol:

Finger error! I fixed it.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by apodman » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:15 pm

bystander wrote:NGC 981 is in Cetus not Aires, where NGC 918 is.
Johnny Rico wrote:I'm from Buenos Aires, and I say kill 'em all!

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by bystander » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:03 pm

Freefall74 wrote:Is this NGC 981 or 918???
Good question! NGC 981 is in Cetus not Aries, which is where NGC 918 is.

Supernova 2009js… Another One Bites The Dust!
Universe Today - October 28th, 2009
Image
Far away in the constellation of Aries, in a 14th magnitude barred spiral galaxy designated as NGC 918… a star exploded with enough candlepower to briefly outshine its home. Discovered independently by Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS) and Koichi Itagaki (Japan) on October 11, 2009, this Type II supernova might be hiding in the intergalactic dust, but it isn't hiding from Joe Brimacombe.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Axel » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:01 pm

Freefall74 wrote:Is this NGC 981 or 918???
Ha! I was just going to ask the same question. I think it's 918.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by apodman » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:48 pm

Storm_norm wrote:Why choose two lines at 90 degrees to point out the region where the event was happening and not an arrow?
The stylish semi-crosshairs catch the eye whether it scans horizontally or vertically, and they will not be mistaken for the mouse cursor. Artist's choice.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Freefall74 » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:34 pm

Is this NGC 981 or 918???

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Storm_norm » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:19 pm

I was thinking the same thing. but that seems kind of trivial after the caption explains that there are stars in the forefront which obviously block our view to what is behind them.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by BMAONE23 » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:04 pm

I would imagine that two lines are used so as to cover as little background as possible (a cross hair would obscure some of the galaxy) And a Circle could be misunderstood as a halo around the object. An Arrow would also obscure more of the background and not accurately depict the exact area without touching the object in question, then again causing potential modification to the entire SN image. 2 perpendicular lines both point to an exact object without touching it and cover less of the image without potentially altering the subject SN in the image.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Storm_norm » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:39 pm

the image is beautiful.
the question I have isn't so beautiful.

Why choose two lines at 90 degrees to point out the region where the event was happening and not an arrow? or perhaps a circle?

did the originator of the image eliminate the two opposite lines from the cross hairs?

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by bystander » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:38 pm

Indigo_Sunrise wrote:Apologies for being late to the discussion, but where does the number '26' come from??? I understand the 10, with 'J' being the tenth letter, and 'S' is the nineteenth, of course, but I cannot figure out where the 26 is coming from..? :?
26 letters in the alphabet :!: :idea:
neufer wrote:
Wikipedia: Supernova: Naming Convention wrote:
Supernova discoveries are reported to the International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, which sends out a circular with the name it assigns to it. The name is formed by the year of discovery, immediately followed by a one or two-letter designation. The first 26 supernovae of the year get designated with an upper case letter from A to Z. Afterward, pairs of lower-case letters are used, starting with aa, ab, and so on. Professional and amateur astronomers find several hundreds of supernovae each year (367 in 2005, 551 in 2006 and 572 in 2007). For example, the last supernova of 2005 was SN 2005nc, indicating that it was the 367th supernova found in 2005.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by neufer » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:27 pm

Axel wrote:The image is indeed beautiful with its wispy clouds and the elegant NGC 981. But gawd! I'm tired of that downer metaphor "death explosion" or "death star". Those explosions are spilling out the stuff of life - oxygen, carbon, iron - which gave birth to us and who knows what other life-forms. A supernova is like a milkweed pod bursting in the meadow:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090910.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarch_(butterfly) wrote:
<<The Monarch (Danaus plexippus) is a milkweed butterfly (subfamily Danainae), in the family Nymphalidae. Monarch butterflies are one of the few insects capable of making transatlantic crossings. They are becoming more common in Bermuda due to increased usage of milkweed as an ornamental plant in flower gardens.>>

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Indigo_Sunrise » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:19 pm

bystander wrote:
kovil wrote:I'm not positive, but if supernovae are named like hurricanes, then SN2009js would mean: as j is #10 in the alphabet, and s is #19; then SN2009js is the 9x26+19 th supernova this year ? the 253rd.
j=10: 26*10 + 19 = 279
Apologies for being late to the discussion, but where does the number '26' come from??? I understand the 10, with 'J' being the tenth letter, and 'S' is the nineteenth, of course, but I cannot figure out where the 26 is coming from..? :?

TIA for any lay-person/dumbed-down answers, so that I may understand..... :lol:

8)

Art And Science ... And Music Too

by apodman » Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:01 pm

Okay, cheerful outlook person, you make me quote a verse of my own old lyrics (again) ...

No second rate destiny authored by prophets of doom
Infinity furnishes nature the ultimate womb
And starlight stream on as I watch possibilities bloom


No milkweed in the meadow, I admit, but (dammit Jim) I'm an astronomer blues man, not a botanist.

For anyone left unfulfilled, it's ...

F#m - Bm - F#m - F#m
Bm - Bm - F#m - F#m
Bm - C#m - F#m - F#m

... (written one chord per bar) and the last word of each line is on the first beat of the third bar.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981 (2009 November 12)

by Axel » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:55 pm

The image is indeed beautiful with its wispy clouds and the elegant NGC 981. But gawd! I'm tired of that downer metaphor "death explosion" or "death star". Those explosions are spilling out the stuff of life - oxygen, carbon, iron - which gave birth to us and who knows what other life-forms. A supernova is like a milkweed pod bursting in the meadow: sure, the pod is now dry and dead but the event is that of giving life, or at least the chance of life.

Re: Art And Science NGC 981

by neufer » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:33 pm

orin stepanek wrote:
neufer wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova#Naming_convention wrote: Professional and amateur astronomers find several hundreds of supernovae each year (367 in 2005, 551 in 2006 and 572 in 2007). For example, the last supernova of 2005 was SN 2005nc, indicating that it was the 367th supernova found in 2005.
That's pretty good considering there are so many galaxies and stars out there to look for them. 8)
That's 1 to 2 per year. :o
1 to 2 per day :?:

Top