Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :ssmile: :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol2: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by geckzilla » Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:35 pm

Hey Kevin, you should go here and update your signature so that it's automatically appended to your posts. Unless you just like typing it manually every time.

I was hoping to figure something out about both the saturn-like object and the weird faint ring but couldn't figure out either. It's also really hard to tell from all these pictures exactly which are obscured by dust lanes and whatnot. It'd be really neat if Google Sky were updated with these extreme closeups and all these data were on various layers that could be toggled on and off but as I understand it would be a painstaking task at best to get them lined up accurately enough or it may have already been done. Their infrared layer is disappointingly low resolution.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:29 am

Osmo wrote:there is interesting "Saturn-like" object.
To add some more information, this object is visible in this Hubble NICMOS (near infrared) data here:

http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/mastpr ... =NA132G060

(you have to view the FITS file to see it)

at the exact coordinates

17:46:03.01 -28:52:46.0

Even in this data it looks extended on either side.

The closest object in SIMBAD to this location is the radio source [HJB85] Sgr A-N1 .

Update: a 2008 paper here:

http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph- ... .174..481L

confirms that there is a compact radio source, 2LC 000.098-0.051, in this direction with an angular diameter of 7.1 arcseconds. That doesn't explain what it is, but does suggest that it is real.

Cheers,
Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:58 am

Hi Martin,

Yes, the link is correct. You can download the FITS file and use a FITS viewer to look at it.

The preview image they provide at the link is too dark to be usable, which is why you need to download the full FITS file.

There are many FITS viewers available. One popular one is Aladin, which you can download here.

One advantage of most FITS files, including that one, is that they are calibrated so that you can read the coordinates off directly in Aladin.

Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:11 am

Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, I cannot view what you have linked to -with any significant detail. So I cannot see what you are talikng about. Perhaps, your coordinates are not correct. You suggested that the object appears only in infrared?

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:58 pm

Hi Martin,

I've tracked down a NICMOS plate at this location:

http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/mastpr ... =NA134R070

The coordinates turn out to be 17:45:28.75 -29:04:21.5

Unfortunately, the object does not appear on the plate at all, even though all of the surrounding stars do.

So it looks like it is an artifact after all, introduced when creating the mosaic mentioned in my previous post.

Cheers,
Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:30 pm

Martin, I haven't given up on this yet.

Your fuzzy object is also visible here:

http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/pr2009002b

so we know that the data was collected by Hubble's NICMOS instrument. It is definitely not visible in the Spitzer or Chandra data. It doesn't look like an artifact to me. I think that it might be a real object visible in near-infrared and am trying to get more accurate coordinates.

UPDATE: Looks like this is an artifact after all, as explained in my next post.

Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:26 am

Thank you for responding to my question. What is it? Perhaps, after more people have viewed it someone will know what it is.

http://asterisk.apod.com/vie ... 27#p112127

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:21 pm

Martin wrote:Here is a close up from the Apod image. Scroll to right.
I've now put this NASA composite image in the Milky Way Explorer, and you can see the object/artifact mentioned by Martin here.

This is a bit of a puzzle because this composite image is supposedly constructed from three previously released NASA images. However, the fuzzy object Martin mentions does not appear on either the original Spitzer or Chandra images and is completely outside the boundary of the original Hubble image.

So where did it come from? Spooky.

Cheers,
Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by SittingDownMan » Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:57 am

SittingDownMan wrote:
Martin wrote:Here is a close up from the Apod image.
The attachment Object.jpg is no longer available
Oh. Sorry.
That looks very like a flaw. An image artifact. Dust on the lens.
It doesn't look real.
'Course I could be mistaken.
SDM.
This is what I thought Martin was talking about.
Sorry for the poor quality, I only have MSPaint to work with.
crop1.JPG
crop1.JPG (82.37 KiB) Viewed 8322 times

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by SittingDownMan » Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:38 am

Martin wrote:Here is a close up from the Apod image.
Object.jpg
Oh. Sorry.
That looks very like a flaw. An image artifact. Dust on the lens.
It doesn't look real.
'Course I could be mistaken.
SDM.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:17 am

Here is a close up from the Apod image. Scroll to right.
Close up of Sagittarius A
Close up of Sagittarius A
Object.jpg (100.41 KiB) Viewed 8347 times
There are many facinating objects to view in this APOD image but this one seemed different.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by SittingDownMan » Sun Nov 15, 2009 2:30 am

kjardine wrote:Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)
by kjardine on Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:33 am
Hi Martin,

This is a false colour image using X-ray and infrared data that our eyes can not see.

The green stars are X-ray sources emitting in the 3-5 keV energy range.

I don't see a "little bubble type object to the right of Sagittarius A".

You can see Sagittarius A here. If you look at the black box at the bottom of that page, you can get a read out of galactic coordinates. What are the coordinates for the "little bubble type object" you mention?

Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org
Hey, thanks, that is well cool.
I suspect the OP is talking about 0.0961 by -0.0502 which looks like either a distant galaxy or a dusty cloud.
Or maybe an oncoming barely-sub-planet-sized warship of the Galactic Overlord's Fleet.
On the APOD picture, there's a star in the lower left with a smoke ring, to the right of that is a triangle of red
blobbies, just to the right and up a bit of the rightmost red blobby is the thing that looks like Saturn as seen
through Mr. Galilei's early scope.
On the cool Hubbley/Spitzer map thingy it looks even more saturnian.
SDM :>

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:33 am

Hi Martin,

This is a false colour image using X-ray and infrared data that our eyes can not see.

The green stars are X-ray sources emitting in the 3-5 keV energy range.

I don't see a "little bubble type object to the right of Sagittarius A".

You can see Sagittarius A here. If you look at the black box at the bottom of that page, you can get a read out of galactic coordinates. What are the coordinates for the "little bubble type object" you mention?

Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:28 am

Great image! What type of star appear green?

Does the little bubble type object to the right of Sagittarius A. have a name?

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Chris Peterson » Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:34 pm

Axel wrote:Now this is the way I see it. If there is a reference plane parallel to the image plane and located between us (i.e. the image on our screens) and the galactic centre, and if a person floating near the galactic centre is looking towards us with his or her body parallel to the reference N-S line and with head pointing north, then that person's "east" will be on his/her right-hand side, which to us will be the left-hand side.
I think you are asking for trouble in two ways here: by talking about "planes", and by changing the position of the observer. The position of an object on the sky is described by 2D spherical coordinates. It is a necessarily geocentric (or heliocentric) coordinate system. And a planar image is actually a projection, and only approximates the actual object when the FOV is small- just like maps of the Earth's surface. It is pretty meaningless to try and assign what we would call "east" to what an observer would see from some other location in the galaxy.

Although the spherical coordinate system used for the sky is related to the Earth's coordinate system (their poles lie on the same line), you might do better forgetting about Earth completely and just picturing a spherical grid on the sky, with coordinates measured in declination (equivalent to latitude on the Earth) measured from +90° at the north celestial pole, to 0° at the celestial equator, to -90° at the south celestial pole, and in right ascension (equivalent to longitude on Earth), with a fixed, arbitrary zero (equivalent to longitude 0° on Earth at a specific time) and increasing through 360° clockwise around the north celestial pole. "East" is the direction that right ascension increases, and isn't necessarily the same everywhere in an image. If you take a picture of the sky around the North Star, for instance, "east" is clockwise: typically to the left below Polaris and to the right above it.

When you look at an annotated image like the one under discussion, don't try too hard (or at all) to relate the directions to your local horizon on Earth. The "north" arrow is just telling you the direction that declination increases, and the "east" arrow is telling you the direction that right ascension increases.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by apodman » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:51 pm

Axel wrote:I hope this doesn't come across as trolling.
Don't worry. You have to drink the special water to become a troll. Only individuals with true troll potential ever find the fountain.

It takes repeated angling of the neck and sweeping of the arms while viewing or imagining the sky to get the hang of the orientation and motions of what's above. It takes practice to look at an unlabeled sky and see grid lines.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Axel » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:46 pm

Thanks to Qev and Chris for their responses to my OP. Now this is the way I see it. If there is a reference plane parallel to the image plane and located between us (i.e. the image on our screens) and the galactic centre, and if a person floating near the galactic centre is looking towards us with his or her body parallel to the reference N-S line and with head pointing north, then that person's "east" will be on his/her right-hand side, which to us will be the left-hand side. So far so good. But more questions arise in my mind. Why, in order to understand the direction pointers on this image, must I assume (a) that some presumed observer at the image object location is not facing the same way I am, and/or (b) that the reference plane on which the directions NESW are "inscribed", as it were, is not simply my reference plane (with east on the right) translated to the image object location?

This must have been debated before but I truly am puzzled. I hope this doesn't come across as trolling.

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by kjardine » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:24 am

Osmo wrote:Close to the centre of the picture in the left bottom quadrant there is interesting "Saturn-like" object. The picture must be zoomed strongly to find this. What is it?
Hi Osmo,

I've also wondered that. This object is visible in this Hubble infrared image, which is where I first spotted it myself a few months ago.

A SIMBAD search around the location brings up this rather long list of possibilities.

My guess from the look of it is that this is a large dust disk surrounding a star that may be much closer than the galactic centre but happens to be in that direction. But I'm not sure!

Cheers,
Kevin

Kevin Jardine
Galaxy Map
http://galaxymap.org

Galactic Tardigrade

by neufer » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:21 pm

Image
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade wrote:
ImageImage

<<Tardigrades (commonly known as water bears or moss piglets) are microscopic, water-dwelling, segmented animals with eight legs. Tardigrades were first described by Johann August Ephraim Goeze in 1773 (kleiner Wasserbär = little water bear). The name Tardigrada means "slow walker" and was given by Lazzaro Spallanzani in 1777. The name water bear comes from the way they walk, reminiscent of a bear's gait. The biggest adults may reach a body length of 1.5 mm, the smallest below 0.1 mm.

More than 1000 species of tardigrades have been described. Tardigrades occur over the entire world, from the high Himalayas (above 6,000 m), to the deep sea (below 4,000 m) and from the polar regions to the equator. The most convenient place to find tardigrades is on lichens and mosses. Other environments are dunes, beaches, soil, and marine or freshwater sediments, where they may occur quite frequently (up to 25,000 animals per litre). Tardigrades often can be found by soaking a piece of moss in spring water.

Tardigrades are polyextremophiles; scientists have reported their existence in hot springs, on top of the Himalayas, under layers of solid ice and in ocean sediments. Some can survive temperatures of -273°C, close to absolute zero, temperatures as high as 151 °C (303 °F), 1,000 times more radiation than other animals such as humans, more than a century without water, and even the vacuum of space.

In September 2007, tardigrades were taken into low Earth orbit on the FOTON-M3 mission and for 10 days were exposed to the vacuum of space. After they were returned to Earth, it was discovered that many of them survived and laid eggs that hatched normally, making these the only animals shown to be able to survive the vacuum of space.>>

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Osmo » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:49 pm

Close to the centre of the picture in the left bottom quadrant there is interesting "Saturn-like" object. The picture must be zoomed strongly to find this. What is it?

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by neufer » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:42 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
zbvhs wrote:To reach the Galactic Center we're going to need much more than rockets. If Prof. Einstein is correct, however, we will probably not get much further than Jupiter.
Rockets will do the job. It just takes a while. But that's true for any propulsion technology. (The reality is that we're not going to ever visit the center of the galaxy.) But there's no reason we can't completely explore our own system, and reach some of the nearer stars. That doesn't require any sort of extraordinary advancement in technology, nor does it require lengths of time that are unreasonable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdgHvuCEWnE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtIpcwLjRs4


Disney's Mars & Beyond:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r99XcaYDjg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxQVaHbqvTI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7RYYVm2o9s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RChnjIKWges
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d76fiWRobU4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRCQ2Cu3bSE

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by peter_from_nyc » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:02 pm

This is what I wanted: an annotated version of the photo.
Thanks!
I requested it a few months ago in Sep2009:
I'm about 60 years old, and with 2 MIT degrees. I love reading APOD every day.

But sometimes, I can NOT figure out what you guys are pointing at.

Is there some way, even a wikipedia type way, that someone can annotate the stars?

E.g. with the "The Center of Globular Cluster Omega Centauri " of 2009 September 14
someone could point to the red stars, the blue stars, the binary stars.

Yeah I can see the difference between red and blue. But wouldn't it be cool (pun intended) to circle the binary stars? Or number them?

This is a bit conceited, but here it goes: if I can't tell the difference, there are probably thousands of people who can't.

Peter
http://asterisk.apod.com/vie ... =9&t=17353
:D

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Martin » Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:56 pm

Great image! What type of star appear green?

Does the little bubble type object to the right of Sagittarius A. have a name?

Re: Galactic centre (APOD 2009/11/11)

by Chris Peterson » Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:45 pm

zbvhs wrote:To reach the Galactic Center we're going to need much more than rockets. If Prof. Einstein is correct, however, we will probably not get much further than Jupiter.
Rockets will do the job. It just takes a while. But that's true for any propulsion technology. (The reality is that we're not going to ever visit the center of the galaxy.)

But there's no reason we can't completely explore our own system, and reach some of the nearer stars. That doesn't require any sort of extraordinary advancement in technology, nor does it require lengths of time that are unreasonable.

Top