by neufer » Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:32 pm
Chris Peterson wrote:jerbil wrote:Do people still use ft-lbs on your side of the pond?
Sadly, some do. In the space program, it is part of our special patented system for crashing billion dollar probes into planets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter
<<The Mars Climate Orbiter was intended to enter orbit at an altitude of 140.5–150 km (460,000-500,000 ft.) above Mars. However, a navigation error caused the spacecraft to reach as low as 57 km (190,000 ft.). The spacecraft was destroyed by atmospheric stresses and friction at this low altitude. The navigation error arose because a NASA subcontractor, Lockheed Martin, used imperial units (pound-seconds) instead of the metric system.>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
<<On 23 July 1983, Air Canada Flight 143, a Boeing 767-200 jet, ran completely out of fuel at 41,000 feet (12,500 m) altitude, about halfway through its flight from Montreal to Edmonton via Ottawa. The crew was able to glide the aircraft safely to an emergency landing at Gimli Industrial Park Airport, a former airbase at Gimli, Manitoba. Fuel loading was miscalculated through misunderstanding of the recently adopted metric system which replaced the Imperial system.>>
Chris Peterson wrote:
The units used on the chart Neufer posted are almost nauseating. ft-lbs is bad enough, but slugs/ft^3 is really awful.
Chris Peterson wrote:It would be nearly impossible to use this information constructively without doing a lot of conversions, which each one a chance for things to go wrong. But most Americans know that switching to proper units would just be a Commie plot to destroy the youth of our nation!
- <<The grain (Symbol: gr) is equal to 0.06479891 grams (Symbol: g). Medical errors in the US are sometimes attributed to the confusion between grains and grams. A patient received phenobarbital 0.5 grams instead of 0.5 grains (0.03 grams) after the prescriber misread the prescription>>
[quote="Chris Peterson"][quote="jerbil"]Do people still use ft-lbs on your side of the pond?[/quote]
Sadly, some do. In the space program, it is part of our special patented system for crashing billion dollar probes into planets.[/quote]
[quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter
<<The Mars Climate Orbiter was intended to enter orbit at an altitude of 140.5–150 km (460,000-500,000 ft.) above Mars. However, a navigation error caused the spacecraft to reach as low as 57 km (190,000 ft.). The spacecraft was destroyed by atmospheric stresses and friction at this low altitude. The navigation error arose because a NASA subcontractor, Lockheed Martin, used imperial units (pound-seconds) instead of the metric system.>>[/quote]
[quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
<<On 23 July 1983, Air Canada Flight 143, a Boeing 767-200 jet, ran completely out of fuel at 41,000 feet (12,500 m) altitude, about halfway through its flight from Montreal to Edmonton via Ottawa. The crew was able to glide the aircraft safely to an emergency landing at Gimli Industrial Park Airport, a former airbase at Gimli, Manitoba. Fuel loading was miscalculated through misunderstanding of the recently adopted metric system which replaced the Imperial system.>>[/quote]
[quote="Chris Peterson"]
The units used on the chart Neufer posted are almost nauseating. ft-lbs is bad enough, but slugs/ft^3 is really awful.[/quote]
[img]http://www.retrometromag.com/picture%20files/Johnny/slugs%20border.jpg[/img]
[quote="Chris Peterson"]It would be nearly impossible to use this information constructively without doing a lot of conversions, which each one a chance for things to go wrong. But most Americans know that switching to proper units would just be a Commie plot to destroy the youth of our nation![/quote]
[list]<<The grain (Symbol: gr) is equal to 0.06479891 grams (Symbol: g). Medical errors in the US are sometimes attributed to the confusion between grains and grams. A patient received phenobarbital 0.5 grams instead of 0.5 grains (0.03 grams) after the prescriber misread the prescription>>[/list]