Zbig912 wrote:Now in many cases we can look at these beautiful pictures like the one of Solar Corona by Koen van Gorp shown on July 26, 2009 and think perhaps it is beautiful but not true.
What I would say is that the image is not only beautiful, but more true than many other images because it actually shows more than the eye can see. If the image claimed to be an accurate representation of what you see at a total eclipse, I'd disagree. But it is specially processed to bring out extreme detail that normally isn't visible to the eye.
On July 22nd 2009 near Xiantao and we were among very few that day in China to observe the eclipse on clear sky. Thus in my opinion those beautiful pictures using either 12 stacked pictures (Photo Gallery of S&T) or the picture by Koen van Gorp simply go too far with processing technique. For many reasons professional astronomers do with their pictures even more advanced changes, but they do it with a research purpose to highlight particular, analyzed element.
We need to consider the intent of the image and the imager before deciding if something goes too far. Many amateurs are no less interested than professionals in capturing the maximum amount of data, and then presenting it visually in an effective way. I think the sort of composite images you describe fall into that category.
I took also some pictures of perhaps mediocre quality but they are far closer to the feelings of that day & that location.
The images are very nice, and I agree that the fifth one down comes close to catching the visual appearance of the corona, although the eye does have more dynamic range and sees a little more detail. But that type of image does match visual reality fairly well, and is beautiful in its own way. I have a somewhat similar image from a different eclipse
here. Although I'm pleased with the images I got, I wouldn't mind having a richer set of digital images to do some interesting processing.
[quote="Zbig912"]Now in many cases we can look at these beautiful pictures like the one of Solar Corona by Koen van Gorp shown on July 26, 2009 and think perhaps it is beautiful but not true.[/quote]
What I would say is that the image is not only beautiful, but more true than many other images because it actually shows more than the eye can see. If the image claimed to be an accurate representation of what you see at a total eclipse, I'd disagree. But it is specially processed to bring out extreme detail that normally isn't visible to the eye.
[quote]On July 22nd 2009 near Xiantao and we were among very few that day in China to observe the eclipse on clear sky. Thus in my opinion those beautiful pictures using either 12 stacked pictures (Photo Gallery of S&T) or the picture by Koen van Gorp simply go too far with processing technique. For many reasons professional astronomers do with their pictures even more advanced changes, but they do it with a research purpose to highlight particular, analyzed element.[/quote]
We need to consider the intent of the image and the imager before deciding if something goes too far. Many amateurs are no less interested than professionals in capturing the maximum amount of data, and then presenting it visually in an effective way. I think the sort of composite images you describe fall into that category.
[quote]I took also some pictures of perhaps mediocre quality but they are far closer to the feelings of that day & that location.[/quote]
The images are very nice, and I agree that the fifth one down comes close to catching the visual appearance of the corona, although the eye does have more dynamic range and sees a little more detail. But that type of image does match visual reality fairly well, and is beautiful in its own way. I have a somewhat similar image from a different eclipse [url=http://www.cloudbait.com/gallery/solar/solareclipses.html]here[/url]. Although I'm pleased with the images I got, I wouldn't mind having a richer set of digital images to do some interesting processing.