by Qev » Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:29 pm
I've also wondered if there are galaxies that are too active for our sort of life to actually evolve in them. Either starburst galaxies, with massive star-formation rates (and the rapid supernova rate this leads to), or highly active galaxies with powerful, quasar-like cores.
I think, in both cases, our sort of life could probably still exist. It all depends on
where in the galaxy one is located. Being tucked away in dusty spiral arms provides decent protection from galactic core activity, and supernovae still need to be very close to do any real harm to Earth-like planets. I'm pretty certain that our own galaxy has undergone some starburst-type activity sometime in the past, and we're here, so...
I'm generally optimistic on this subject, I guess.
I've also wondered if there are galaxies that are too active for our sort of life to actually evolve in them. Either starburst galaxies, with massive star-formation rates (and the rapid supernova rate this leads to), or highly active galaxies with powerful, quasar-like cores.
I think, in both cases, our sort of life could probably still exist. It all depends on [b]where[/b] in the galaxy one is located. Being tucked away in dusty spiral arms provides decent protection from galactic core activity, and supernovae still need to be very close to do any real harm to Earth-like planets. I'm pretty certain that our own galaxy has undergone some starburst-type activity sometime in the past, and we're here, so... :)
I'm generally optimistic on this subject, I guess. :)